Investigator

Yang Song

Associate Professor · Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Material Science & Engineering

About

YSYang Song
Papers(3)
Nucleus-Localizing Co…Gel-to-Coacervate Tra…Histogram Analysis Co…
Collaborators(4)
Chuanliang FengShi YangYage ZhangJinwei Qiang
Institutions(3)
State Key Laboratory …Shenzhen UniversityJinshan Hospital of F…

Papers

Histogram Analysis Comparison of Monoexponential, Advanced Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging, and Dynamic Contrast‐Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Borderline From Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors

BackgroundThe accurate preoperative differentiation between borderline and malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (BEOTs vs. MEOTs) is crucial for determining the proper surgical strategy and improving the patient's postoperative quality of life. Several diffusion and perfusion MRI technologies are valuable for the differentiation; however, which is the best remains unclear.PurposeTo compare the whole solid‐tumor volume histogram analysis of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) in the differentiation of BEOTs vs. MEOTs and to identify the correlations between the perfusion parameters from IVIM and DCE‐MRI.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationTwenty patients with BEOTs and 42 patients with MEOTs.Field Strength/Sequence1.5T/DWI, DKI, and IVIM models fitting from 13 different b factors and 40 phases DCE‐MRI.AssessmentHistogram metrics were derived from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion kurtosis (K), diffusion coefficient (Dk), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (kep), and extravascular extracellular volume fraction (ve).Statistical TestsThe Mann–Whitney U‐test and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to determine the best histogram metrics and parameters. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the best combined model for each two from the four technologies. Spearman's rank correlation was used to analyze the correlations between the IVIM and DCE‐MRI parameters.ResultsADC, D, Dk, and D* were significantly higher in BEOTs than in MEOTs (P < 0.05). K, Ktrans, kep, and ve were significantly lower in BEOTs than in MEOTs (P < 0.05). The 10th percentile of Dk was the most reliable single metric, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921. Dk combined with Ktrans yielded the highest AUC of 0.950. A weak inverse correlation was found between D and Ktrans (r = −0.320, P = 0.025) and between D and kep (r = −0.267, P = 0.037).Data ConclusionThe 10th percentile of Dk was the most valuable metric and Dk combined with Ktrans had the best performance for differentiating BEOTs from MEOTs. There was no evident link between perfusion‐related parameters derived from IVIM and DCE‐MRI.Level of Evidence: 4Technical Efficacy Stage: 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:257–268.

11Works
3Papers
4Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmTumor Microenvironment

Positions

2020–

Associate Professor

Shanghai Jiao Tong University · School of Material Science & Engineering

2017–

Research Fellow

Georgia Institute of Technology

2016–

Postdoc Research Fellow

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor