Xiaohui Duan

Achieving flexible fairness metrics in federated medical imaging

The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in medical imaging raises fairness and privacy concerns across demographic groups, especially in diagnosis and treatment decisions. While federated learning (FL) offers decentralized privacy preservation, current frameworks often prioritize collaboration fairness over group fairness, risking healthcare disparities. Here we present FlexFair, an innovative FL framework designed to address both fairness and privacy challenges. FlexFair incorporates a flexible regularization term to facilitate the integration of multiple fairness criteria, including equal accuracy, demographic parity, and equal opportunity. Evaluated across four clinical applications (polyp segmentation, fundus vascular segmentation, cervical cancer segmentation, and skin disease diagnosis), FlexFair outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both fairness and accuracy. Moreover, we curate a multi-center dataset for cervical cancer segmentation that includes 678 patients from four hospitals. This diverse dataset allows for a more comprehensive analysis of model performance across different population groups, ensuring the findings are applicable to a broader range of patients.

Whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models at high b values for assessing cervical cancer

To assess the diagnostic potential of whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models for differentiating cervical cancer (CC) aggressive status regarding of pathological types, differentiation degree, stage, and p16 expression. Patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center study from March 2022 to July 2023. Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) were obtained including 15 b-values (0 ~ 4000 s/mm 89 women (mean age, 55 ± 11 years) with CC were enrolled in our study. The combined model, which incorporated the CTRW, DKI, FROC, and IVIM diffusion models, offered a significantly higher AUC than that from any individual models (0.836 vs. 0.664, 0.642, 0.651, 0.649, respectively; p < 0.05) in distinguishing cervical squamous cell cancer from cervical adenocarcinoma. To distinguish tumor differentiation degree, except the combined model showed a better predictive performance compared to the DKI model (AUC, 0.839 vs. 0.697, respectively; p < 0.05), no significant differences in AUCs were found among other individual models and combined model. To predict the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, only DKI and FROC model were established and there was no significant difference in predictive performance among different models. In terms of predicting p16 expression, the predictive ability of DKI model is significantly lower than that of FROC and combined model (AUC, 0.693 vs. 0.850, 0.859, respectively; p < 0.05). Multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models with whole-tumor histogram analysis show great promise to assess the aggressive status of CC.