Wouter W de Herder

Clinicopathological and epigenetic differences between primary neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine metastases in the ovary

AbstractCurrently, the available literature provides insufficient support to differentiate between primary ovarian neuroendocrine tumors (PON) and neuroendocrine ovarian metastases (NOM) in patients. For this reason, patients with a well‐differentiated ovarian neuroendocrine tumor (NET) were identified through electronic patient records and a nationwide search between 1991 and 2023. Clinical characteristics were collected from electronic patient files. This resulted in the inclusion of 71 patients with NOM and 17 patients with PON. Histologic material was stained for Ki67, SSTR2a, CDX2, PAX8, TTF1, SATB2, ISLET1, OTP, PDX1, and ARX. DNA methylation analysis was performed on a subset of cases. All PON were unilateral and nine were found within a teratoma (PON‐T+). A total of 78% of NOM were bilateral, and none were associated with a teratoma. PON without teratomous components (PON‐T−) displayed a similar insular growth pattern and immunohistochemistry as NOM (p > 0.05). When compared with PON‐T+, PON‐T− more frequently displayed ISLET1 positivity and were larger, and patients were older at diagnosis (p < 0.05). Unsupervised analysis of DNA methylation profiles from tumors of ovarian (n = 16), pancreatic (n = 22), ileal (n = 10), and rectal (n = 7) origin revealed that four of five PON‐T− clustered together with NOM and ileal NET, whereas four of five PON‐T+ grouped with rectum NET. In conclusion, unilateral ovarian NET within a teratoma should be treated as a PON. Ovarian NET localizations without teratomous components have a molecular profile analogous to midgut NET metastases. For these patients, a thorough review of imaging should be performed to identify a possible undetected midgut NET and a corresponding follow‐up strategy may be recommended.

Unfavorable biological behavior and treatment response of neuroendocrine ovarian metastases of midgut neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine ovarian metastases (NOM) predominantly derive from midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and develop in about 25% of women with advanced stage of this malignancy. Little is known of the growth rate and treatment response of NOM. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of different management options for patients with NOM, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), somatostatin analogues (SSAs) and oophorectomy. Records were screened for patients with well-differentiated NOM of midgut origin that presented in our NET referral center between 1991 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of ovarian and extra-ovarian metastases were determined using RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) 1.1. In 12 available patients undergoing PRRT, NOM were associated with a shorter PFS than extra-ovarian metastases (P = 0.003). While PRRT induced a similar decrease in TGR for ovarian and extra-ovarian lesions in nine patients with available data (–2.3 vs –1.4, P > 0.05), only the TGR of NOM remained positive after PRRT. In 16 patients treated with SSAs, the TGR of NOM was almost three times that of extra-ovarian lesions during treatment (2.2 vs 0.8, P = 0.011). Oophorectomy was performed in 46 of the 61 included patients and was significantly associated with a prolonged OS (115 vs 38 months, P < 0.001). This association persisted after propensity score matching and correction for tumor grade and simultaneous tumor debulking. In conclusion, NOM have a higher TGR compared to extra-ovarian metastases, resulting in a shorter PFS after PRRT. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy should be considered for postmenopausal women with NOM undergoing surgery for metastatic midgut NETs.