Investigator

Wonkyo Shin

National Cancer Center

WSWonkyo Shin
Papers(5)
How to manage synchro…Incidence trends for …Survival Effects of C…The Knowledge and Att…Incidence of venous t…
Collaborators(10)
Myong Cheol LimSang-Soo SeoSang-Yoon ParkSokbom KangChong Woo YooHak Jin KimHyunsoon ChoYedong SonJiwon LimJoseph J Noh
Institutions(4)
National Cancer CenterRepublic Of Korea ArmyWoosuk UniversitySamsung Medical Center

Papers

How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?

Abstract Backgrounds We aimed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) by comparing the differences between double primary cancer (DPC) and metastatic cancer (MC). Methods The medical records of 47 patients diagnosed synchronously with endometrial and ovarian cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight and 19 patients were diagnosed with DPC and MC, respectively. Demographics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared. The clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The demographics were not different between both groups. Endometrioid histology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade were higher in the MC group than in the DPC group (42.1% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.018, P = 0.002, respectively). The ratio of post-operative adjuvant therapy was not different in both groups. Recurrence occurred in five patients with DPC and seven with MC. The difference in RFS was not significantly different (P = 0.131) but the OS was different between both groups (P = 0.020). Histology and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were associated wtih RFS in univariate analysis, but no difference was found in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Although DPC patients had longer OS, multivariate analysis did not identify any influential factors. Focus should be placed on defining the appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients, which will improve prognosis, rather than on discriminating between DPC and MC.

Incidence trends for epithelial peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tube cancer during 1999–2016: a retrospective study based on the Korean National Cancer Incidence Database

Primary peritoneal cancer (PPC), ovarian cancer (OC), and fallopian tube cancer (FTC) are considered as a single disease group. As knowledge of the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of peritoneal, ovarian, and fallopian tube (POFT) cancer grows, the tendencies in OC diagnosis are changing. We investigate the incidence and clinical characteristics of epithelial POFT based on cancer site and histologic type. Data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry for the period between 1999 and 2016 were analyzed. The incidence rates and annual percent changes (APCs) for each tumor site were reported. Among 27,768 women with cancer, 1,086 (3.91%) had PPC, 25,847 (93.08%) had OC, and 835 (3.01%) had FTC. Age-standardized rates increased from 0.05 to 0.24, 3.51 to 5.48, and 0.04 to 0.28 in PPC, OC, and FTC, respectively. The proportion of PPC and FTC among all the POFT cases increased consistently during the study period (from, respectively, 1.48 and 1.06 in 1999 to 4.52 and 4.76 in 2016). The APC of PPC, OC, and FTC during 1999-2016 was 9.3%, 2.7%, and 8.6%, respectively. The incidence of PPC, OC, and FTC was highest among patients in the 65-69, 50-54, and 55-59 years age group, respectively. The overall incidence of PPC, OC, and FTC cancer has steadily increased. The relative increase of PPC and FTC has been significant. In this study, OC incidence had a relatively young peak age, in contrast to FTC and PPC, which had an older peak age.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism after standard treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea

AbstractBackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a hospital‐associated severe complication that may adversely affect patient prognosis. In this study, we evaluated the incidence of VTE and its risk factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the electronic health record data of 1268 patients with EOC who received primary treatment at the National Cancer Center, Korea between January 2007 and December 2017 to identify patients who developed VTE. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics of these patients were ascertained. Competing risks analyses were performed to estimate the cumulative incidence of VTE according to the treatment type. The associations between putative risk factors and the incidence of VTE were evaluated using the Fine–Gray regression models accounting for competing risks of death.ResultsVTE was the most prevalent cardiovascular event, found in 9.6% (n = 122) of all patients. Of these VTE events, 115 (94.3%) occurred within 2 years of EOC diagnosis. Advanced cancer stage at diagnosis (distant vs. localized, hazards ratio [HR])= 14.49, p = 0.015) and extended hospital stay (≥15 days, HR =3.87, p = 0.004) were associated with the incidence of VTE. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of VTE between primary cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (HR =0.81, p = 0.390).ConclusionsApproximately 10% of patients with EOC were diagnosed with VTE, which was the most common cardiovascular disease found in this study. The assessment of VTE risks in patients with advanced‐stage EOC with an extended hospital stay is needed to facilitate adequate prophylactic treatment.

18Works
5Papers
15Collaborators