Investigator

William Zamboni

Professor; Director · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy

WZWilliam Zamboni
Papers(1)
Randomized Phase II S…
Collaborators(10)
Ainhoa MadariagaAmit M. OzaAndrea JewellAndrew B. NixonAndrew PoothullilBradley R. CorrClaire O’ConnorCrystal LeeDavid E. CohnEugenia Girda
Institutions(8)
Unc Lineberger Compre…Princess Margaret Can…University Health Net…University Of KansasDuke UniversityUniversity Of Colorad…The Ohio State Univer…Rutgers Cancer Instit…

Papers

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab with Weekly Anetumab Ravtansine or Weekly Paclitaxel in Platinum-Resistant/Refractory High-Grade Ovarian Cancer (NCI Trial)

Abstract Purpose: Mesothelin (MSLN) is highly expressed in high-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancers (HGOC). Anetumab ravtansine (AR) is an antibody–drug conjugate directed at the MSLN antigen with a tubulin polymerization inhibitor. We assessed the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of the combination AR/bevacizumab (Bev; ARB) versus weekly paclitaxel/Bev (PB) in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory HGOC (prrHGOC). Patients and Methods: Following a run-in phase I study to assess ARB safety, patients with prrHGOC with centrally confirmed MSLN-positive expression were randomized to ARB or PB (weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with Bev 10 mg/kg biweekly). Patients were stratified by platinum resistance/refractory and prior Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall response rate, safety, and blood-based angiome biomarker assessment. A futility analysis was planned after 35 PFS events. Results: The combination of Bev (10 mg/kg) biweekly with AR (2.2 mg/kg) weekly was well tolerated. About phase II results, MSLN positivity was 88%, and 57 patients were randomized (28 ARB and 29 PB). Forty-two percentage of patients received prior Bev, and 23% were platinum-refractory. At futility analysis, the median PFS was 5.3 and 12.7 months for ARB and PB, respectively [P = 0.03; HR = 2.02 (1.06–3.86)]. The overall response rate was 21% with ARB and 65% with PB. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (18%) with ARB and neutropenia (24%) with PB. Higher baseline levels of circulating IL6 were associated with worse PFS, and its levels decreased with PB treatment. Conclusions: Our study stopped at interim analysis highlighting the benefit of PB in prrHGOC as the standard of care.

185Works
1Papers
28Collaborators
Cell Line, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmOvarian NeoplasmsNeoplasm GradingAcute Radiation Syndrome

Positions

2008–

Professor; Director

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy