Investigator
Second Affiliated Hospital Of Anhui Medical University
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising in adenomyosis in a patient with pelvic organ prolapse—case report
Abstract Background Adenomyosis is a frequent finding in endometrial carcinoma patients. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma is the most common type of endometrial carcinoma; however, endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis is extremely rare. Case presentation In this case report, we describe a 69-year-old woman who required surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The patient had been postmenopausal for 20 years and had no abnormal bleeding after menopause. The patient underwent transvaginal hysterectomy, repair of anterior and posterior vaginal walls, ischium fascial fixation and repair of an old perineal laceration. Histological examination of surgical specimens revealed endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were then performed. The postoperative histopathological diagnosis was stage IB endometrial cancer (endometrioid carcinoma G2). Conclusions In summary, endometrioid adenocarcinoma arising from adenomyosis (EC-AIA) is a rare entity and the early diagnosis is difficult. Adequate preoperative assessment and enhanced inquiry of occult clinical symptoms of postmenopausal women before hysterectomy may contribute to the diagnosis of EC-AIA preoperatively.
Coexistence of uterine adenosarcoma and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: A case report and literature review
Uterine adenosarcoma coexisting with endometrial carcinoma is a very rare disease. Herein, we reported the case of uterine adenosarcoma coexisting with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Transvaginal ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations all indicated a space-occupying lesion in the uterine cavity, and initially was considered endometrial carcinoma. Subsequently, total hysterectomy combined with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were performed. The coexistence of uterine adenosarcoma and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma was histologically confirmed postoperatively. The patient recovered well after surgery and was discharged on postoperative day 7. At a follow-up examination 10 months after surgery, we found no evidence of discomforting symptoms and recurrence or metastasis. Since the coexistence of uterine adenosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma is rare, it is easy to be overlooked the presence of uterine adenosarcoma on imaging or morphology, and thus be misdiagnosed as a more common disease, namely endometrial carcinoma. Observing the cystic structure within the lesion on magnetic resonance imaging is helpful for the diagnosis of uterine adenosarcoma. This article summarizes the imaging characteristics, clinicopathological features, molecular correlation, treatment, and prognosis of the disease.