Wen‐Fang Cheng

Outcomes after fertility‐sparing surgery of early‐stage ovarian cancer: A nationwide population‐based study

Abstract Background Fertility‐sparing surgery (FSS) is an alternative choice of young patients who have not completed their family planning and still have fertility needs. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of early‐stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients undergoing FSS and radical comprehensive staging surgery (RCS), and the suitability of FSS. Methods A total of 1297 patients aged between 20 and 44 years with newly diagnosed early‐stage EOC were recruited from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database between 2009 and 2017. Site‐specific surgery codes were used to distinguish patients in FSS group or RCS group. Cancer‐specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method with log‐rank test and Cox regression model. Results There were 401 and 896 patients in FSS and RCS group. Patients in FSS group were with younger age and mostly had Stage I disease. In contrast, patients in RCS group were older. There were more Stage II, high‐grade (Grade 3) disease, and adjuvant chemotherapy in RCS group. Stage and tumor grade were two independent factors correlating with CSS and the type of surgery showed no effect on CSS (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66–1.77, p  = 0.73) in multivariable analysis. In multivariable analysis, the clear cell carcinoma group who underwent FSS demonstrated better CSS compared to those in the RCS group (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.06–0.82, p  = 0.04). A total of 17 women who underwent FSS developed second malignancies of the uterine corpus or contralateral ovary. Conclusion FSS can be a safe alternative procedure in selected young patients of Stage I EOC who have fertility desire. Endometrial biopsy before or during FSS and regular surveillance to detect recurrence are mandatory for ovarian cancer patients undergoing FSS.

Impact of adjuvant treatment on survival in patients with 2023 FIGO stage IIC endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis from two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan

In early-stage endometrial cancer, aggressive histologic types (grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types) are associated with an increased risk of distant metastases and worse survival. However, the optimal adjuvant treatment for these patients remains controversial. The present study investigated the outcomes of different adjuvant treatments in patients with 2023 FIGO stage IIC endometrial cancer. We retrospectively identified patients with 2023 FIGO stage IIC endometrial cancer who underwent surgery followed by either adjuvant treatment or observation from 2000 to 2020 at two tertiary centers in Korea and Taiwan. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. We also analyzed recurrence patterns after different adjuvant treatments. A total of 272 patients were identified; 204 received adjuvant treatment postoperatively, whereas 68 only underwent observation. Adjuvant treatment was not associated with improved RFS or OS. Non-endometrioid histologic types (p=0.003) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, p=0.002) were associated with worse RFS, whereas only non-endometrioid histologic types impacted OS (p=0.004). In subgroup analyses, adjuvant treatment improved OS in patients with LVSI (p=0.020) and in patients with both LVSI and grade 3 endometrioid histologic type (p=0.007). We found no difference in locoregional and distant recurrence between patients undergoing adjuvant treatment or observation. In this study, the addition of adjuvant treatment was associated with an OS benefit for patients with LVSI, especially those with grade 3 endometrioid tumors.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts clinicopathological parameters and stages of endometrial carcinomas

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe investigated the agreement and accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with postoperative pathological characteristics and stages of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC).MethodsWe recruited 527 women with EEC who underwent staging surgery at a single medical institution. The preoperative MRI, stages, and clinical and pathological parameters, including myometrial invasion (MI), cervical invasion (CI), adnexal metastasis (AM), intra‐abdominal metastasis, and pelvic and/or para‐aortic nodal metastasis, were recorded and analyzed. The agreement and accuracy between the preoperative MRI findings and these parameters and stages were assessed.ResultsThe rate of the preoperative MRI‐based clinical stage matching the postoperative surgical stage was 85.2% in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA, 51.9% in stage IB, 35.5% in stage II, 5.3% in stage IIIA, 33.3% in stage IIIB, 28.6% in stage IIIC1, 64.3% in stage IIIC2, and 93.8% in stage IVB. The consistency between radiologists and pathologists was 80.5% for deep MI, 91.5% for cervical invasion, 92.2% for adnexal metastasis, 98.9% for intra‐abdominal metastasis, and 87.5% and 92.2% for pelvic and para‐aortic nodal metastases, respectively. The negative predictive value of intra‐abdominal metastasis was the highest with 99.8%.ConclusionsPreoperative MRI could be an excellent tool for routine preoperative assessment to predict pathological parameters and stages of EEC, especially in excluding intra‐abdominal metastatic disease.

Increased risk of second primary malignancies among endometrial cancer survivors receiving surgery alone: A population‐based analysis

AbstractBackgroundWomen with endometrial cancer (EC) have favorable prognoses, leaving them vulnerable to the development of second primary cancers (SPCs). We investigated the SPC risk and survival outcomes among EC patients treated with surgery alone in order to exclude the impact of adjuvant treatment on the results.MethodsData from the Taiwan Cancer Registry from 1995 to 2013 were analyzed. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of SPCs among EC survivors were calculated.ResultsAmong 7725 women enrolled, 478 developed an SPC. The overall SIR for SPCs in EC survivors was 2.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59–3.10) compared with the general female population. Women diagnosed with EC at age <50 years had a higher SIR for an SPC than those diagnosed at age ≥50 years (SIR = 4.38 vs. 1.28). The most frequent site of an SPC was the small intestine (SIR = 8.39, 95% CI 2.72–19.58), followed by the kidney (SIR = 4.84, 95% CI 1.78–10.54), and oral cavity (SIR = 4.52, 95% CI 2.17–8.31). Women, regardless of age at EC diagnosis, had significantly higher SIRs for subsequent breast, colorectal, lung, and thyroid cancer, and lymphoma. Women with an SPC had shorter overall survival than those without (5‐year: 88.9 vs. 94.2%, 10‐year: 71.3 vs. 89.8%, 15‐year: 62.3 vs. 86.1%, and 20‐year: 47.6 vs. 81.1%, all ps<0.001).ConclusionsEven women treated for EC with surgery alone, especially young EC survivors, had an increased risk of SPCs. Genetic counseling/testing is recommended for young EC patients, and all are recommended to receive regular surveillance and screening for breast, colorectal, and lung cancers.

Diverse genetic spectrum among patients who met the criteria of hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer syndrome

Genetic high-risk assessment combines hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer into one syndrome. However, there is a lack of data for comparing the germline mutational spectrum of the cancer predisposing genes between these three cancers. Patients who met the criteria of the hereditary breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer were enrolled and received multi-gene sequencing. We enrolled 730 probands: 418 developed breast cancer, 185 had ovarian cancer, and 145 had pancreatic cancer. Out of the 18 patients who had two types of cancer, 16 had breast and ovarian cancer and 2 had breast and pancreatic cancer. A total of 167 (22.9%) patients had 170 mutations. Mutation frequency in breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer was 22.3%, 33.5% and 17.2%, respectively. The mutation rate was significantly higher in patients with double cancers than those with a single cancer (p<0.001). The mutation spectrum varies across the three cancer types and family histories. Our analysis provides guidance for physicians, counsellors, and counselees on the offer and uptake of genetic counseling.

Ovarian cancer risk score predicts chemo-response and outcome in epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

Cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard frontline treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We aimed to develop an ovarian cancer risk score (OVRS) based on the expression of 10 ovarian-cancer-related genes to predict the chemoresistance, and outcomes of EOC patients. We designed a case-control study with total 149 EOC women including 75 chemosensitives and 74 chemoresistants. Gene expression was measured using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. We tested for correlation between the OVRS and chemosensitivity or chemoresistance, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS), and validated the OVRS by analyzing patients from the TCGA database. The chemosensitive group had lower OVRS than the chemoresistant group (5 vs. 15, p≤0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Patients with disease relapse (13 vs. 5, p60 months) of patients with OVRS ≥10 were significantly shorter than those of patients with OVRS <10). The high OVRS group also had significantly shorter median OS than the low OVRS group in 255 patients in the TCGA database (39 vs. 49 months, p=0.046). Specific genes panel can be clinically applied in predicting the chemoresistance and outcome, and decision-making of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Outcome and prognostic factors of unexpected ovarian carcinomas

AbstractBackgroundWe investigated risk factors influencing the outcome of unexpected ovarian carcinomas.MethodsWe reviewed the ovarian carcinoma patients treated at atertiary medical institution between 2000 and 2017 and analyze the clinico‐pathological characteristics, treatment strategies, recurrence status, and outcome.ResultsA total of 112 women (65 primary laparoscopic surgery [LSC] and 47 laparotomic surgery [LAPA]) were included in the analysis. The LSC group had smaller ovarian tumors (10.5 ± 7.3 cm vs. 16.6 ± 8.7 cm, p = 0.031) and higher incidence of subsequent staging surgery (56.9% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.0001) compared to the LAPA group. There were 98/112 (86.6%) of early stages (I/II) diseases. The difference between the recurrent rate (27.7% vs. 31.9%), disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were not significant among surgical groups. In the multivariate analysis, FIGO stage (stage II hazard ratio [HR] 6.61, p = 0.007; stage III HR 8.40, p = 0.002) was the only prognostic factor for DFS. FIGO stage (stage II HR 20.78, p = 0.0001; stage III HR 7.99, p = 0.017), histological type (mucinous HR 12.49, p = 0.036), and tumor grade (grade 3 HR 35.01, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for OS, while women with latency &gt;28 days from primary to staging surgery had significantly poorer OS (p = 0.008). Women with latency &gt;28 days between primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy had similar DFS (p = 0.31) and a trend of poorer OS (p = 0.064).ConclusionsThe prognosis of unexpected ovarian cancer is independent from the primary surgical procedure and comprehensive staging surgery should be performed at close proximity after the diagnosis of unexpected ovarian malignancy.