Wendy R. Brewster

Adverse Urinary System Diagnoses among Older Women with Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Background: Endometrial cancer and its treatment may impact urinary system function, but few large-scale studies have examined urinary diagnoses among endometrial cancer survivors. We investigated the risk of several urinary outcomes among older women with endometrial cancer compared with similar women without a cancer history. Methods: Women aged 66+ years with an endometrial cancer diagnosis during 2004–2017 (N = 44,386) and women without a cancer history (N = 221,219) matched 1:5 on exact age, race/ethnicity, and state were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data. ICD-9 and -10 diagnosis codes were used to define urinary outcomes in the Medicare claims. HRs for urinary outcomes were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Relative to women without cancer, endometrial cancer survivors were at an increased risk of several urinary system diagnoses, including lower urinary tract infection [HR, 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.32–2.40], urinary calculus (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.13–2.31), renal failure (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.23–2.33), and chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.81–1.90). Similar associations were observed in sensitivity analyses limited to 1+ and 5+ years after endometrial cancer diagnosis. Black race, higher comorbidity index, higher stage or grade cancer, non-endometrioid histology, and treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation were often significant predictors of urinary outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, among older women, the risk of urinary outcomes is elevated after endometrial cancer. Impact: Monitoring for urinary diseases may be a critical part of long-term survivorship care for older women with an endometrial cancer history.

Demographic and clinical factors associated with variations in opioid administration using conscious sedation during HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To examine patient characteristics that predispose to higher opioid administration during tandem and ovoid (T&O) high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Patients were included if they received at least one fraction of HDR T&O brachytherapy with analgesia administration recorded in the Medication Administration Record. Fentanyl dose was dichotomized as "low" (mean <125 μg per fraction), or "high" (mean ≥ 125 μg per fraction). Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed comparing mean opioid dose per fraction with demographic and clinical information. RESULTS From July 2014 through May 2020, 113 patients underwent 531 T&O HDR brachytherapy fractions with oral benzodiazepine and intravenous opioid fentanyl for conscious sedation. The median opioid dose per fraction was 100 μg fentanyl (range 0-250 μg). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, younger age (OR 1.071, p = 0.002) and higher BMI (OR 1.091, p = 0.019) were associated with increased opioid administration during brachytherapy. Black women received less opioid during brachytherapy when compared to White women (OR 0.296, p = 0.047). FIGO stage, ECOG score, smoking status, prior narcotic use, prior illicit drug use, parity, prior cervical procedure, Smit sleeve placement, and distance to treatment center were not associated with high opioid dose. CONCLUSION Cervical cancer patients who are younger or have higher BMI receive more narcotic analgesia during HDR brachytherapy whereas Black women received less narcotic analgesia, irrespective of age and BMI. This underscores the immediate need to address how pain is assessed and managed during brachytherapy.

Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping to Predict Progression to High-Grade Cervical Precancer: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Southeastern United States

Abstract Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing is utilized in primary cervical cancer screening, generally along with cytology, to triage abnormalities to colposcopy. Most screening-based hrHPV testing involves pooled detection of any hrHPV or of HPV16/18. Cervical neoplasia progression risks based on extended hrHPV genotyping—particularly non-16/18 hrHPV types—are not well characterized. HPV genotype-specific incidence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or more severe (CIN2+) following an abnormal screening result was examined. Methods: We assessed a US-based prospective, multiracial, clinical cohort of 343 colposcopy patients with normal histology (n = 226) or CIN1 (n = 117). Baseline cervical samples underwent HPV DNA genotyping, and participants were followed up to 5 years. Genotype-specific CIN2+ incidence rates (IR) were estimated with accelerated failure time models. Five-year CIN2+ risks were estimated nonparametrically for hierarchical hrHPV risk groups (HPV16; else HPV18/45; else HPV31/33/35/52/58; else HPV39/51/56/59/68). Results: At enrollment, median participant age was 30.1 years; most (63%) were hrHPV-positive. Over follow-up, 24 participants progressed to CIN2+ (7.0%). CIN2+ IR among hrHPV-positive participants was 3.4/1,000 person-months. CIN2+ IRs were highest for HPV16 (8.3), HPV33 (7.8), and HPV58 (4.9). Five-year CIN2+ risk was higher for HPV16 (0.34) compared with HPV18/45 (0.12), HPV31/33/35/52/58 (0.12), and HPV39/51/56/59/68 (0.16) (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Non-16/18 hrHPV types are associated with differential CIN2+ progression rates. HPV16, 33, and 58 exhibited the highest rates over 5 years. HPV risk groups warrant further investigation in diverse US populations. Impact: These novel data assessing extended HPV genotyping in a diverse clinical cohort can inform future directions to improve screening practices in the general population.