Investigator

Wei Chen

湖南省妇幼保健院

WCWei Chen
Papers(7)
Instability in the Pe…tRF-20-S998LO9D Inhib…The Value of <scp>P16…RETRACTED: Preliminar…Efficacy and safety o…Risk Stratification o…Phenolic Compounds fr…
Collaborators(10)
Xiaohua WuXinnian YuXu QiaoYue ZhangZhiwen WangZhong ZhengAndi XuCunYu LiGuoPing PengHeather Hampel
Institutions(8)
The Ohio State Univer…Fudan University Shan…Second Affiliated Hos…Shandong UniversityHebei University Of C…Nanjing UniversityNanjing University Of…City Of Hope National…

Papers

Instability in the Penta-C and Penta-D Loci in Microsatellite-Unstable Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer. Early detection is one of the most important predictors of survival. The cancer is curable if detected early but the five-year survival rate in advanced cases can be as low as 22%. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is used to screen populations for Lynch Syndrome (LS), the most common cause of inherited EC, and to classify EC into distinct groups with unique histological, prognostic, and molecular features. Accurate sample identification is crucial for successful MSI testing because instability is assessed by comparing amplification patterns in markers in the normal and tumor samples that must be taken from the same individual. Penta-C and Penta-D pentanucleotide markers are used widely for sample identification in not only MSI testing but also parentage verification, forensic science, and population genetics studies. The objective of this study was to test 324 pairs of tumor and matched normal DNAs from EC patients for instability in these markers using the Promega MSI Analysis SystemTM considered the “gold standard” in MSI testing. Both markers were unstable, and therefore not reliable for MSI testing, in 8.2% of the EC patients with MSI. Instability in both mono- and pentanucleotide markers suggest that the tumors with MSI likely suffer from a “generalized” form of instability also affecting other short tandem repeats. Results from many studies using these markers for various purposes may not be accurate if samples with MSI are involved.

Efficacy and safety of low‐dose apatinib in ovarian cancer patients with platinum‐resistance or platinum‐refractoriness: A single‐center retrospective study

AbstractBackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib with a low dose of 250 mg/d in the treatment of platinum‐resistant or platinum‐refractory ovarian cancer patients.MethodsPatients with platinum‐resistant or platinum‐refractory ovarian carcinoma treated with 250 mg/d apatinib in our institution from November 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response and progression were evaluated according to the standard by incorporating the levels of CA125 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. CTCAE 4.03 was used to evaluate adverse events (AEs).ResultsFifty‐two eligible patients were enrolled in per‐protocol (PP) analysis and 65 patients (including 13 lost to follow‐up) were included in the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis. In PP analysis, 18 patients (34.6%) had partial response (PR), 22 patients (42.3%) had stable disease (SD), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.83‐5.17 m), and median overall survival (OS) was 25.33 months (95% CI, 17.74‐32.92 m). The objective response rate and DCR for patients in ITT analysis were 27.7% and 49.2%, respectively. The top three treatment‐related AEs were hypertension, hand‐foot syndrome, and leukopenia. Eight patients (15.4%) in PP population had grade 3 treatment‐related AEs. Previous chemotherapy lines, number of recurrences, and AEs did not affect the efficacy of apatinib. Age older than 60 was associated with higher rates of disease control and prolonged PFS (P &lt; .05).ConclusionApatinib 250 mg/d is a feasible treatment in platinum‐resistant or platinum‐refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with Intermediate-Risk Factors: Model Development and Validation Based on Machine Learning Algorithm

Abstract Background Adjuvant therapy for patients with cervical cancer (CC) with intermediate-risk factors remains controversial. The objectives of the present study are to assess the prognoses of patients with early-stage CC with pathological intermediate-risk factors and to provide a reference for adjuvant therapy choice. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 481 patients with stage IB–IIA CC. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, machine learning (ML) algorithms, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to develop and validate prediction models for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 35 (7.3%) patients experienced recurrence, and 20 (4.2%) patients died. Two prediction models were built for DFS and OS using clinical information, including age, lymphovascular space invasion, stromal invasion, tumor size, and adjuvant treatment. Patients were divided into high-risk or low-risk groups according to the risk score cutoff value. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in DFS (p = .001) and OS (p = .011) between the two risk groups. In the traditional Sedlis criteria groups, there were no significant differences in DFS or OS (p &amp;gt; .05). In the ML-based validation, the best AUCs of DFS at 2 and 5 years were 0.69/0.69, and the best AUCs of OS at 2 and 5 years were 0.88/0.63. Conclusion Two prognostic assessment models were successfully established, and risk grouping stratified the prognostic risk of patients with CC with pathological intermediate-risk factors. Evaluation of long-term survival will be needed to corroborate these findings. Implications for Practice The Sedlis criteria are intermediate-risk factors used to guide postoperative adjuvant treatment in patients with cervical cancer. However, for patients meeting the Sedlis criteria, the choice of adjuvant therapy remains controversial. This study developed two prognostic models based on pathological intermediate-risk factors. According to the risk score obtained by the prediction model, patients can be further divided into groups with high or low risk of recurrence and death. The prognostic models developed in this study can be used in clinical practice to stratify prognostic risk and provide more individualized adjuvant therapy choices to patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

2Works
7Papers
16Collaborators

Positions

2016–

Researcher

湖南省妇幼保健院

Education

2016

The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

Country

CN