Vit Drochytek

Fertility sparing treatment in cervical cancer management in pregnancy

The article focuses on fertility-sparing management during pregnancy and obstetrical management after fertility-sparing surgery. Over the years, more women in developed countries tend to delay childbirth to a later age, which leads to cervical cancer more often diagnosed during pregnancy. The advances in our understanding of prognosis and treatment options in these patients have helped us to address avenues and to circumvent standard therapy and fetal demise, respecting maternal and fetal chances. Childbearing trends also lead to an increase in the number of patients considering fertility-sparing management when diagnosed with cervical cancer. Such management represents a challenge for obstetricians as prior cervical surgery is a known risk factor for various adverse events. These include decreased fertility, second trimester miscarriage, preterm labor, or preterm premature rupture of membranes. Watchful follow-up and various prophylactic measures are keys when striving for the best possible outcome.

Rucaparib maintenance for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: interim overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety at 5 years of follow-up from the phase III ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45 study

We report the long-term efficacy and safety from the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45 (NCT03522246) study of first-line rucaparib maintenance for advanced ovarian cancer. Patients were randomized 4 : 1 to oral rucaparib + intravenous (i.v.) placebo or oral + i.v. placebo. Stratification factors were homologous recombination deficiency (HRD; BRCA mutation and loss of heterozygosity status) classification, residual disease post-chemotherapy, and surgical timing. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (invPFS) in HRD and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. Overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary endpoints. Second event of progression (PFS2) and time to first subsequent treatment (TFST) were exploratory. Interim OS and final safety analyses data cut-off was 9 March 2023. Updated invPFS, PFS2, and TFST analyses data cut-off was 5 May 2025. Median invPFS follow-up was ∼59 months for both rucaparib (HRD, n = 185; ITT, n = 427) and placebo (HRD, n = 49; ITT, n = 111). invPFS was significantly longer with rucaparib versus placebo in the HRD [31.4 versus 12.0 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.76] and ITT (20.2 versus 9.2 months; HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.69) populations. Interim OS was immature (OS maturity: ITT 35%) with the median (95% CI) OS not reached with rucaparib and 46.2 (34.6-not reached) months with placebo for the ITT population (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.17). ITT TFST (median 23.6 versus 12.1 months) and PFS2 (35.1 versus 26.9 months) were longer with rucaparib versus placebo. Overall, 34.6% of patients receiving rucaparib completed the 24-month treatment cap versus 17.3% receiving placebo. As of 5 May 2025, 40.0% of patients on rucaparib were still on study and in long-term follow-up. Safety remained consistent with the primary analysis. Rucaparib monotherapy provides significant and durable long-term benefit as first-line maintenance for patients with advanced ovarian cancer with and without HRD.

Multi-agent LLMs for Decision Support in Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy

The aim of this study is to develop an AI-assisted decision-making system based on multi-agent large language models and to evaluate its effectiveness and accuracy in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer during pregnancy.