Investigator

Victoria L. Champion

Associate Director of Cancer Control and Population Science · Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center

Research Interests

VLCVictoria L. Champ…
Papers(1)
A Randomized Control …
Collaborators(7)
Electra D. PaskettEric A. VachonErika B. BiedermanMira L. KatzPatrick O. MonahanRyan D. BalticTimothy E. Stump
Institutions(5)
U M Rogel Cancer Cent…The Ohio State Univer…Indiana UniversityIndiana University Sc…Uc Davis Comprehensiv…

Papers

A Randomized Control Trial of Two Interventions Compared with Usual Care for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Living in the Rural Midwest

Abstract Background: Lower cervical cancer screening rates are associated with higher cervical cancer mortality among women living in rural compared with urban areas (defined by rural–urban community codes). The study purpose was to examine the effectiveness of a mailed digital video disc (DVD) versus DVD plus patient navigation (PN) versus usual care (UC) on increasing the percentage of rural women up to date (UTD) with cervical cancer screening guidelines. Methods: Rural women (ages 50–74 years) who were not UTD for cervical cancer screening (n = 553) were consented and randomized 2:2:1 (DVD, DVD + PN, and UC, respectively). Baseline and 12-month surveys included sociodemographic characteristics, history of previous cervical cancer screening, and cervical cancer screening knowledge and beliefs. Screening status was assessed by medical record review at baseline and 12 months after randomization. Results: The mean age of participants was 59.8 years. After controlling for covariates, women randomized to the DVD + PN group had greater odds [OR = 5.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.38–11.50] of being UTD with cervical cancer screening compared with UC at 12 months after randomization. Other significant covariates in the model included having a college versus high school or lower education (OR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.08–5.63), private (OR = 4.16; 95% CI, 1.28–19.1) or no insurance (OR = 8.74; 95% CI, 1.77–51.9) versus public insurance, normal (OR = 3.25; 95% CI, 1.46–7.24) or overweight (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.05–4.42) versus obese body mass index, and positive screening intention in the next six months (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.48–4.52). Conclusions: A DVD + PN intervention increased the percentage of rural women UTD with cervical cancer screening compared with UC or DVD only. Impact: Women who have a high school or lower education, were on public insurance, obese, and not planning to be screened need increased attention to become UTD with cervical cancer screening.

237Works
1Papers
7Collaborators
Early Detection of CancerBreast NeoplasmsNeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCancer Care FacilitiesNeoplasm StagingPapillomavirus Infections

Positions

2011–

Associate Director of Cancer Control and Population Science

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center

2010–

Edward W. and Sarah Stam Cullipher Endowed Chair

Indiana University · School of Nursing

2001–

Distinguished Professor

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1985–

Faculty, Graduate School

Indiana University Bloomington

1996–

Scientific Director and Mary Margaret Walther Professor of Nursing

Walther Cancer Foundation

2008–

Graduate Faculty

Purdue University · Psychology

2010–

Executiver Associate Dean for Research Affairs

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1992–

Associate Dean for Research

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1990–

Professor

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1986–

Associate Professor

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1981–

Assistant Professor

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1980–

Lecturer

Indiana University · School of Nursing

1979–

Teaching Assistant

Indiana University · School of Nursing

Education

1981

PhD

Indiana University

1975

MSN

Indiana University

1970

BSN

Indiana University · School of Nursing