Victoria L. Bae-Jump

Palmitic Acid Exerts Anti-Tumorigenic Activities by Modulating Cellular Stress and Lipid Droplet Formation in Endometrial Cancer

Epidemiological and clinical evidence have extensively documented the role of obesity in the development of endometrial cancer. However, the effect of fatty acids on cell growth in endometrial cancer has not been widely studied. Here, we reported that palmitic acid significantly inhibited cell proliferation of endometrial cancer cells and primary cultures of endometrial cancer and reduced tumor growth in a transgenic mouse model of endometrial cancer, in parallel with increased cellular stress and apoptosis and decreased cellular adhesion and invasion. Inhibition of cellular stress by N-acetyl-L-cysteine effectively reversed the effects of palmitic acid on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and invasive capacity in endometrial cancer cells. Palmitic acid increased the intracellular formation of lipid droplets in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Depletion of lipid droplets by blocking DGAT1 and DGAT2 effectively increased the ability of palmitic acid to inhibit cell proliferation and induce cleaved caspase 3 activity. Collectively, this study provides new insight into the effect of palmitic acid on cell proliferation and invasion and the formation of lipid droplets that may have potential clinical relevance in the treatment of obesity-driven endometrial cancer.

Bridging the Gap from Bench to Bedside: A Call for In Vivo Preclinical Models to Advance Endometrial Cancer and Cervical Cancer Immuno-oncology Research

Abstract Advanced-stage endometrial and cervical cancers are associated with poor outcomes despite contemporary advances in surgical techniques and therapeutics. Recent clinical trial results have led to a shift in the treatment paradigm for both malignancies, in which immunotherapy is now incorporated as the standard of care up front for most patients with advanced endometrial and cervical cancers as the standard of care. Impressive response rates have been observed, but unfortunately, a subset of patients do not benefit from immunotherapy, and survival remains poor. Continued preclinical research and clinical trial development are crucial for our understanding of resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy and maximization of therapeutic efficacy. In this setting, syngeneic models are preferred over xenograft models as they allow for the evaluation of the tumor–immune interaction in an immunocompetent host, most closely mimicking the tumor–immune interaction in patients with cancer. Unfortunately, significant disparities exist about syngeneic models in gynecologic malignancy, in which queries from multiple large bioscience companies confirm no commercial availability of endometrial or cervical cancer syngeneic cell lines. Published data exist about the recent development of several endometrial and cervical cancer syngeneic cell lines, warranting further investigation. Closing the disparity gap for preclinical models in endometrial and cervical cancers will support physician scientists, basic and translational researchers, and clinical trialists who are dedicated to improving outcomes for our patients with advanced disease and poor prognosis.

Adverse Urinary System Diagnoses among Older Women with Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Background: Endometrial cancer and its treatment may impact urinary system function, but few large-scale studies have examined urinary diagnoses among endometrial cancer survivors. We investigated the risk of several urinary outcomes among older women with endometrial cancer compared with similar women without a cancer history. Methods: Women aged 66+ years with an endometrial cancer diagnosis during 2004–2017 (N = 44,386) and women without a cancer history (N = 221,219) matched 1:5 on exact age, race/ethnicity, and state were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data. ICD-9 and -10 diagnosis codes were used to define urinary outcomes in the Medicare claims. HRs for urinary outcomes were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Relative to women without cancer, endometrial cancer survivors were at an increased risk of several urinary system diagnoses, including lower urinary tract infection [HR, 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.32–2.40], urinary calculus (HR, 2.22; 95% CI, 2.13–2.31), renal failure (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.23–2.33), and chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.81–1.90). Similar associations were observed in sensitivity analyses limited to 1+ and 5+ years after endometrial cancer diagnosis. Black race, higher comorbidity index, higher stage or grade cancer, non-endometrioid histology, and treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation were often significant predictors of urinary outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, among older women, the risk of urinary outcomes is elevated after endometrial cancer. Impact: Monitoring for urinary diseases may be a critical part of long-term survivorship care for older women with an endometrial cancer history.

“It really takes a village”: perspectives on multi-level barriers to endometrial cancer care for rural patients

While it is established that rural cancer patients face multi-level barriers to high-quality treatment, the interconnections between these barriers and how they drive rural cancer disparities is not well-understood. Therefore, our objective was to better understand the interconnections between barriers to high-quality treatment faced by rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 clinicians and healthcare personnel from three large, geographically diverse, rural-serving, integrated healthcare systems in North Carolina. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to examine barriers to high-quality treatment for rural EC patients. Initial codes were derived from a multi-level conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. We identified three domains of interconnected barriers. First, travel distance, the most frequently noted barrier, amplified financial barriers and caregiver burden. While gynecologic oncologists could reduce travel burden by referring patients to nearby treatment facilities, provider participants expressed mixed opinions regarding the quality of care received at local facilities. Second, limited health literacy among rural patients often led to challenges in patient-provider communication, including challenges with care-related decision making and comprehension of diagnosis and treatment goals. Finally, supportive care and financial resources were often concentrated at large, urban facilities and not accessible to rural patients. However, even these large facilities lack established systems or standardized processes for supporting the most vulnerable patients. To achieve equitable access to care and outcomes among EC patients, those living in rural areas may require more targeted, intensive outreach, support, and resources.