Investigator

Victoria Cullimore

Gynaecological Oncology Research Fellow · Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Gynaecological Oncology

Research Interests

VCVictoria Cullimore
Papers(1)
Investigating the acc…
Collaborators(7)
Emma J CrosbieHolly Baker-RandJo MorrisonKim ChuLorna McWilliamsRebecca NewhouseSudha Sundar
Institutions(5)
Somerset Nhs Foundati…The University of Man…Queen Mary University…Nihr Manchester Biome…The University of Bir…

Papers

Investigating the acceptability of cervical screening, using conventional clinician-taken cervical samples or urine self-sampling, at 6 weeks postnatal: A cross-sectional questionnaire

Objectives United Kingdom (UK) guidelines recommend delaying cervical screening due during pregnancy to 12 weeks postnatal, despite a lack of supporting evidence. This questionnaire-based study aimed to determine the feasibility of a clinical study of cervical screening and urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) at 6 weeks postnatal, as pilot work suggested this would improve uptake, if offered at the routine postnatal check-up. Methods Females who were pregnant/recently pregnant were invited to participate in a web-based questionnaire. Questions assessed acceptability of postnatal cervical screening at 6 weeks postnatal, analysed with chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann–Whitney tests. Free-text responses were coded using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to conduct a qualitative content analysis. Results Among the 454 participants, 266 (58.6%) would be more likely to undergo cervical screening if offered at 6 weeks postnatal, and an even higher proportion expressed increased willingness if urine self-sampling were offered ( n  = 338; 74.4%). Two-thirds (308/454; 67.8%) would be willing to be screened at 6 weeks postnatal for a research study and 356/454 (78.4%) if it would be limited only to urine self-sampling. When considering screening modality, over half (245/454; 54%) would prefer urine self-sampling to cervical screening, although a fifth (93/454; 21%) preferred conventional sampling. Free-text responses were provided by 279 participants, and these highlighted that affective attitude and burden TFA constructs underpinned prospective acceptability of having screening at 6 weeks postnatal. Conclusions Offering cervical screening at the 6-week postnatal check-up has potential to increase cervical screening participation. Most participants would be interested in taking part in the research. The feasibility of screening at 6 weeks postnatal and concurrent acceptability should be tested in pilot clinical studies.

9Works
1Papers
7Collaborators
Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerPapillomavirus Infections

Positions

2024–

Gynaecological Oncology Research Fellow

Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust · Gynaecological Oncology