Investigator

Vicky C. Chang

National Cancer Institute

Research Interests

VCCVicky C. Chang
Papers(1)
Serum perfluorooctane…
Collaborators(7)
Gretchen L GierachJonathan N. HofmannJongeun RheeMark P. PurdueNeal D FreedmanRena R JonesSteven C Moore
Institutions(1)
Division Of Cancer Ep…

Papers

Serum perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer according to hormone receptor status: An analysis in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

Abstract Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly persistent endocrine‐disrupting chemicals that may contribute to breast cancer development; however, epidemiologic evidence is limited. We investigated associations between prediagnostic serum levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and postmenopausal breast cancer risk, overall and by hormone receptor status, in a nested case‐control study of 621 cases and 621 matched controls in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. PFOS and PFOA levels were determined based on serum metabolomic profiling performed using ultraperformance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between each PFAS and breast cancer risk, overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status, and by joint ER/PR status. We found little evidence of association between PFOS or PFOA and breast cancer risk overall. However, in subtype‐specific analyses, we observed statistically significant increased risks of ER+, PR+, and ER+/PR+ tumors for the third vs lowest quartile of serum PFOS (ORs [95% CIs] = 1.59 [1.01‐2.50], 2.34 [1.29‐4.23], and 2.19 [1.21‐3.98], respectively) and elevated but nonstatistically significant ORs for the fourth quartile. Conversely, for PFOA, modest positive associations with ER−, PR−, ER+/PR−, and ER−/PR− tumors were generally seen in the upper quartiles. Our findings contribute evidence supporting positive associations between serum PFOS and hormone receptor‐positive tumors, and possibly between PFOA and receptor‐negative tumors. Future prospective studies incorporating tumor hormone receptor status are needed to better understand the role of PFAS in breast cancer etiology.

34Works
1Papers
7Collaborators
Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerOvarian NeoplasmsKidney DiseasesHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Positions

Researcher

National Cancer Institute

Education

2020

PhD

University of Toronto · Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Epidemiology

2014

MPH

University of Toronto · Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Epidemiology

2010

BSc

University of British Columbia · Microbiology and Immunology

Country

CA