Verena Wieser

Biopsy‐proven residual cervical cancer at the end of combined chemoradiation predicts poor outcome—Retrospective single‐center cohort study

Abstract Introduction Persistent tumor after combined chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer is an established prognostic factor. Detection may include magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT scan, ultrasound, or biopsies; however, no agreement about the best method and time point has been reached. In our institution, a standardized biopsy protocol of at least four punch biopsies is routinely performed at the last brachytherapy with re‐biopsies 6 weeks later in cases not showing histologic complete response (hCR). This study aims to assess the prognostic relevance of these biopsies, especially with respect to the time point of hCR. Material and Methods This investigation was a retrospective single‐center observational cohort study that included all patients treated for locally advanced or node‐positive cervical cancer with combined chemoradiation at the University Hospital Innsbruck between 2008 and 2023. Patients with a hCR at the end of radiotherapy were classified as primary negative and otherwise as primary positive. Primary positive patients that achieved complete response at a control biopsy 6 weeks later were classified as secondary negative, and the remaining patients with residual tumor as secondary positive. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between all these groups. Results We included 184 patients in this study, from which 46 (25%) were classified as primary positive. These patients experienced a significantly worse PFS compared to primary negative patients ( p  = 0.008, HR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.20, 3.45]). The difference in PFS was also evidenced when comparing primary negative patients to those who had a hCR 6 weeks after radiotherapy (secondary negative) ( p  = 0.018, HR = 2.00, 95% CI [1.13, 3.56]). However, in primary positive patients, OS was not significantly reduced ( p  = 0.29, HR = 1.45, 95% CI [0.73, 2.86]). Conclusions Early response evaluation using punch biopsies at the time of the last brachytherapy can identify patients with residual tumor, which exhibit a statistically significant and clinically meaningful risk of disease progression. This risk was not reversed even in the case of a delayed hCR 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation.

High RIG‐I expression in ovarian cancer associates with an immune‐escape signature and poor clinical outcome

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with platinum‐based chemotherapy remaining the mainstay for adjuvant treatment after surgery. The lack of indication for immunotherapy may at least in part result from the lack of suitable biomarkers allowing stratification of potentially responding patients. In this monocentric study of 141 cases with OC, we used real‐time quantitative PCR to assess the expression of retinoic acid‐inducible gene‐I (RIG‐I) in primary tumor and healthy ovarian control tissues. RIG‐I expression was correlated to various clinicopathological characteristics as well as to a set of molecular and immunological markers. The prognostic significance of RIG‐I expression was queried in univariate and multivariate analyses and validated in an independent cohort. RIG‐I was overexpressed in the cancerous ovary and correlated with a higher tumor grade. The more aggressive Type‐II cancers and cancers with inactivating p53 mutations exhibited higher RIG‐I expression. RIG‐I levels were also elevated in cancers that recurred after remission or were platinum‐refractory. Survival analyses disclosed RIG‐I as an independent marker of poor outcome in OC. Continuative analyses revealed the molecular and immunological correlates of RIG‐I expression in the tumor microenvironment, including interferon production and a distinct immune‐regulatory signature involving checkpoint molecules (PD‐L1/PD‐1), the RNA‐editing enzyme ADAR1 and the regulatory T cell‐specific transcription factor FoxP3. We conclude that high RIG‐I expression associates with poor outcome in OC, which is explainable by local immunosuppression in the tumor bed. RIG‐I expression may inform checkpoint blockade and/or RIG‐I agonistic targeting in a subset of high‐risk OC patients.