Veli-Matti Partanen

Factors affecting young women's participation in organized cervical cancer screening and non-organized testing – A population-based survey study

Objectives Organized cervical cancer screening reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality and is widely implemented across Europe. However, non-organized cervical cancer testing remains common. Frequent testing may lead to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment, especially among young women. This study aims to identify factors influencing young women's participation in organized cervical cancer screening and non-organized cervical cancer testing. Methods We surveyed 1411 women aged 15–35 living in Finland, assessing their knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer testing. Survey responses were linked to sociodemographic registry data and cervical cancer testing records. Descriptive statistics of survey responses and logistic regression were used to identify factors influencing participation in both organized screening and non-organized testing. Results Human papillomavirus vaccination status, medical contraception use, and gynecologist visit frequency were key predictors of non-organized testing. Human papillomavirus-vaccinated women were 50% less likely to undergo non-organized testing compared to those unvaccinated. Medical contraception users were 5.3 times more likely compared to non-users, and frequent gynecologist visitors were 1.5 times more likely to undergo non-organized testing compared to infrequent visitors. For organized screening, women with tertiary education were 4.1 times more likely to participate than those with primary education. Women appreciated the flexibility in screening times and locations. Human papillomavirus awareness was high with 91.3% of respondents having heard of the virus. Conclusions To address non-organized testing among young women, comprehensive education about human papillomavirus and cervical cancer screening is essential, both for screened women and healthcare professionals. Aligning screening practices with women's preferences may improve adherence to organized screening, ultimately benefiting public health outcomes.

Comparison of cytology and human papillomavirus-based primary testing in cervical screening programs in the Nordic countries

Objective To compare primary test positivity in cytology and human papillomavirus-based screening between different Nordic cervical cancer screening programs using harmonized register data. Methods This study utilized individual-level data available in national databases in Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Cervical test data from each country were converted to standard format and aggregated by calculating the number of test episodes for every test result for each calendar year and one-year age group and test method. Test positivity was estimated as the proportion of positive test results of all primary test episodes with a valid test result for “any positive” and “clearly positive” results. Results The age-adjusted rate ratio for any positive test results in primary human papillomavirus-based screening compared to cytology was 1.66 (95% CI 1.64–1.68). The age-adjusted rate ratio for clearly positive test results was 1.02 (95% CI 1.00–1.05). A decreasing rate ratio by age was seen in both any positive and clearly positive test results. Test positivity increased over time in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden but slightly decreased in Finland. Conclusions The probability of any positive test result was higher in human papillomavirus testing than in primary cytology, even though the cross-sectional detection of a clearly positive test result was the same. Human papillomavirus testing can still lead to an improved longitudinal sensitivity through a larger number of follow-up tests and the opportunity to identify women with a persistent human papillomavirus infection. Further research on histologically verified precancerous lesions is needed in primary as well as repeat testing.

Setting the record straight—Correcting uterine cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic countries by reallocation of unspecified cases

AbstractIntroductionThe incidence of and mortality from cancers of the cervix uteri and corpus uteri are underestimated if the presence of uterine cancers, where the exact topography (site of origin) is not specified, is omitted. In this paper we present the corrected figures on mortality from and incidence of cervix and corpus uteri cancers in the Nordic countries by reallocating unspecified uterine cancer deaths and cases to originate either from the corpus uteri or cervix uteri. To further validate the accuracy of reallocation, we also analyzed how well the reallocation captures the changes occurring as the result of a transition in cause of death coding in Norway that took place in 2005.Material and MethodsThis study uses data available in the NORDCAN database, which contains aggregated cancer data from all the Nordic countries for the years 1960–2016. The unspecified uterine cancer cases and deaths were reallocated to either cervix uteri or corpus uteri based on the estimated probability that follows the distribution of cases and deaths with verified topography. The estimated proportions of cases and deaths for both cancers were calculated for each combination of age group, year, and country as a proportion of cases (and deaths, respectively) with known topography. Annual age‐standardized rates were calculated by direct age‐adjustment.ResultsThe proportions of unspecified uterine cancers were higher in the mortality data than in incidence data, with mean values for 1960–2016 ranging between 5.1% and 26.6% and between 0.2% and 6.8% by country, respectively. In the Nordic countries combined, the reallocation increased the number of cases by 4% and deaths by approximately 20% for both cancers. Finland was the only Nordic country where the mortality rate did not increase substantially after reallocation.ConclusionsThe reallocation procedure had a significant impact on mortality from cancers of the cervix and corpus uteri for countries where the proportion of cancer deaths coded as uterus, not otherwise specified, is substantial. More effort to validate cause of death data with incidence data from cancer registries is warranted to avoid erroneous conclusions of temporal trends based on uncorrected cancer burden.