Veena John

Clinical Implications of Genomic Loss of Heterozygosity in Endometrial Carcinoma

PURPOSE Homologous recombination deficiency, identified by homologous recombination deficiency gene alterations or high percentage of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), is associated with improved prognosis, platinum sensitivity (PS), and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor response in high-grade ovarian cancer. Since the copy number–high (CN-H) endometrial cancer molecular subtype (EC-MS) shares molecular features with high-grade ovarian cancer, our aim was to assign EC-MS on the basis of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results and evaluate the gLOH status with clinical behavior of EC. METHODS Eighty-two epithelial EC tumor tissues were sequenced by hybrid capture–based CGP, and results were used to assign EC-MS (ultramutated, microsatellite instability–high, CN-low; CN-high). Retrospective chart review established clinical characteristics, including PS. Relationships of PS, EC-MS, gene alterations, and gLOH were assessed statistically. RESULTS PS and EC-MS of CN-H showed statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS). Most notably, when the CN-H EC-MS was subcategorized by gLOH status, there was a significant difference in OS with gLOH-H being associated with longer survival. Cox semi-proportional hazard modeling showed that gLOH, stage, and race were significant in modeling OS. CONCLUSION The method of assigning EC-MS by CGP demonstrates similar clinical features to previous reports of EC-MS assigned by other methods. CGP can also assess gLOH status with gLOH-H most commonly seen in CN-H tumors. CN-H, gLOH-H patients showed significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.100 [0.02-0.51 95% CI]). Thus, gLOH status may be a meaningful prognostic biomarker within the CN-H tumors and possibly across EC-MS.

Comparing Durvalumab, Olaparib, and Cediranib Monotherapy, Combination Therapy, or Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer with Prior Bevacizumab: The Phase II NRG-GY023 Trial

Abstract Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of anti–PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with olaparib and cediranib (DOC), compared with the standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), who had prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods: NRG-GY023 was the first randomized four-arm superiority phase II trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid or clear-cell PROC with prior bevacizumab exposure. Patients were randomized 1:2:2:2 to SOC (weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), DOC, durvalumab + cediranib (DC), or olaparib + cediranib (OC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and safety. The design had 80% power to detect an HR of 0.5 using a one-sided, α = 0.1-level test for each comparison with the SOC with a preplanned interim analysis. Experimental arms with HR estimates (vs. SOC) >0.87 could be discontinued. Results: A total of 153 patients were enrolled between April 4, 2021, and February 1, 2023. Accrual was permanently closed on February 1, 2023, due to futility. With a data cutoff of September 9, 2024, the median PFS was 3.4, 2.9, 2.5, and 2.8 months, and median overall survival was 7.5, 8.3, 5.7, and 10.2 months for SOC, DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. The overall response rate was 4.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.00–0.19], 15.9% (95% CI, 0.07–0.29), 11.9% (95% CI, 0.05–0.24), and 9.1% (95% CI, 0.03–0.20) for SOC, DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. Compared with SOC, the PFS HR estimates were 1.003 (95% CI, 0.56–1.80), 1.108 (95% CI, 0.63–1.96), and 1.021 (95% CI, 0.57–1.82) for DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In patients with PROC with prior bevacizumab, all experimental arms failed to reach the primary objective of improving PFS compared with SOC.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancer

Advanced gynecologic cancers have historically lacked effective treatment options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, offering durable responses for some patients. In addition, many immunotherapy strategies are under investigation for the treatment of earlier stages of disease or in other gynecologic cancers, such as ovarian cancer and rare gynecologic tumors. While the integration of ICIs into the standard of care has improved outcomes for patients, their use requires a nuanced understanding of biomarker testing, treatment selection, patient selection, response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life considerations, among other topics. To address this need for guidance, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with gynecologic cancer.