Ugo De Giorgi

Treatment Strategies for Advanced Endometrial Cancer According to Molecular Classification

The management of advanced endometrial cancer (EC) has changed in the last few years due to the introduction of a new molecular classification and the approval of immunotherapy. For a long time, carboplatin plus paclitaxel was considered the standard treatment for first-line advanced EC, since the approval of the combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. For patients with recurrent EC, with previous platinum-based chemotherapy, single-agent immunotherapy or in combination with tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been approved according to mismatch repair status. Ongoing trials are exploring the possibility of a chemo-free future for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) EC and new molecular targets are under investigation. The treatment paradigm for advanced EC has shifted from standard chemotherapy for all to a more personalized approach. The aim of this review is to provide an updated therapeutic landscape for the management of patients with advanced/metastatic EC according to their disease history and molecular biology.

Single-Agent Trabectedin Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer With BRCA-Mutated and/or BRCAness Phenotype: A Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE Literature evidence suggests that trabectedin monotherapy is effective in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presenting BRCA mutation and/or BRCAness phenotype. METHODS A prospective, open-label, randomized phase III MITO-23 trial evaluated the activity and safety of trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks (arm A) in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers or patients with BRCAness phenotype (ie, patients who responded to ≥two previous platinum-based treatments) with recurrent OC, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube cancer in comparison with physician's choice chemotherapy in the control arm (arm B; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine, once-weekly paclitaxel, or carboplatin). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS Overall, 244 patients from 21 MITO centers were randomly assigned (arm A = 122/arm B = 122). More than 70% of patients received ≥three previous chemotherapy lines and 35.7% had received a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) before enrollment. Median OS was not significantly different between the arms: arm A: 15.8 versus arm B: 17.9 months ( P = .304). Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months in arm A versus 4.4 months in arm B ( P = .897). Among 208 patients evaluable for efficacy, the objective response rate was 17.1% in arm A and 21.4% in arm B, with comparable median duration of response (5.62 v 5.66 months, respectively). No superior effect was observed for trabectedin in the prespecified subgroup analyses according to BRCA mutational status, chemotherapy type, and pretreatment with a PARPi and/or platinum-free interval. Trabectedin showed a higher frequency of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and serious adverse drug reactions compared with control chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Trabectedin did not improve median OS and showed a worse safety profile in comparison with physician's choice control chemotherapy.