Investigator

Tomoya Mukai

Fukuyama University

TMTomoya Mukai
Papers(2)
Adherence to national…Comparative analysis …
Collaborators(5)
Atsuto KatanoKeiichi NakagawaMasanari MinamitaniShingo OhiraMasayuki Tatemichi
Institutions(4)
Fukuyama UniversityUniversity Of Tokyo H…The University Of Tok…Tokai University

Papers

Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in Japanese workplaces: a survey-based classification of enterprises’ practices into “overscreening,” “underscreening,” and “guideline-adherence screening”

Workplace cancer screening programs are determined as part of an employee's benefits package and health checkups are perceived positively. However, the current status of workplace cancer screening programs in Japan is unavailable. This study aimed to assess the adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace among Japanese enterprises and identify factors associated with excessive or inadequate screenings. A cross-sectional study design was employed. Data were obtained from a survey conducted by the "Corporate Action to Promote Cancer Control" between November and December 2022 among registered partner enterprises in Japan. The survey included questions on background characteristics, cancer screening practices, and intervention approaches. The analysis included 432 enterprises that provided complete responses regarding colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings. The guideline-adherence rates for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace were 12.7%, 3.0%, and 8.8%, respectively. Enterprises had lower adherence to screening guidelines than local governments. Colorectal (70.8%) and breast (67.1%) cancer screenings were predominantly categorized as "overscreening" and cervical (60.6%) cancer screening, as "underscreening." Factors such as enterprise scale, health insurance associations, and the number of interventional approaches were significantly associated with increased "overscreening" (101-1000: β = 0.13, p = 0.01; ≥ 1000: β = 0.17, p < 0.01; health insurance association: β = 0.23, p < 0.01; and approaches: β = 0.42, p < 0.01) and reduced "underscreening" (101-1000: β = -0.13, p = 0.01; ≥ 1000: β = -0.17, p < 0.01; health insurance association: β = -0.18, p < 0.01; and approaches: β = -0.48, p < 0.01). Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in the workplace was suboptimal among Japanese enterprises. Therefore, appropriate cancer screening measures and interventions to ensure guideline adherence and optimization of screening benefits while minimizing potential harms should be expeditiously implemented.

Comparative analysis of treatment decision-making in patients with localized prostate and cervical cancer: what influences receiving surgery or radiotherapy?

Abstract Purpose This study focused on identifying the factors influencing the decision-making process in patients with localized prostate and cervical cancer in Japan and specifically examining the choice between surgery and radiotherapy. Methods Patients with specific cancer stages registered with a healthcare research company for whom radical surgery or radiotherapy was equally effective and recommended participated in this cross-sectional online survey. Results The responses of 206 and 231 patients with prostate and cervical cancer, respectively, revealed that both groups relied heavily on the physicians’ recommendations (prostate: odds ratio (OR) = 40.3, p &lt; 0.001; cervical: OR = 5.59, p &lt; 0.001) and their impression of radiotherapy (prostate: OR = 9.22, p &lt; 0.001; cervical: OR = 2.31, p &lt; 0.001). Factors such as hypertension (OR = 6.48, p &lt; 0.05), diabetes mellitus (OR = 9.68, p &lt; 0.05), employment status (OR = 0.08, p &lt; 0.01), and impressions of surgery (OR = 0.14, p &lt; 0.01) also played a significant role in patients with prostate cancer. In contrast, the specialty of the physician (OR = 4.55, p &lt; 0.05) proposing the treatment influenced the decision-making process of patients with cervical cancer. Information sources varied between the two groups: patients with prostate cancer were more inclined towards printed materials, whereas patients with cervical cancer were more inclined towards interpersonal relationships. Conclusion Although several limitations, such as the sample and recall bias, were noted, this study emphasizes the role of psychosocial factors in the decision-making process and the requirement for tailored information sources.

2Papers
5Collaborators