Tomomi Aoshika

Salvage image-guided freehand interstitial brachytherapy for pelvic sidewall recurrence after hysterectomy for uterine malignancies

Pelvic sidewall recurrence after hysterectomy for uterine malignances has a poor prognosis, and the salvage therapy for this type of recurrence is still challenging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of freehand high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) through the perineum using transrectal ultrasonography for this disease. We retrospectively evaluated 42 patients with pelvic sidewall recurrence after hysterectomy for uterine cervical and endometrial cancers. We investigated patients' characteristics, the 2-year local control and survival rates, and late adverse events of the rectum and bladder. The 2-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.8-89.3%), 69.4% (95% CI, 55.4-80.1%), and 37.3% (95% CI, 24.6-56.5%), respectively. In Cox multivariate analysis, tumor size at recurrence (<45 mm vs. ≥45 mm) (p = 0.04) and disease-free periods after hysterectomy (<10 months vs. ≥10 months) (p < 0.01) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Lymph node metastasis at recurrence (p < 0.01) was also a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival. Three patients experienced Grade 3-4 late proctitis (7%). Transperineal freehand salvage HDR-ISBT using transrectal ultrasonography was demonstrated to be a curative treatment option for patients with pelvic sidewall recurrence following hysterectomy. Based on the findings of this study, we emphasize the importance of HDR-ISBT for pelvic sidewall recurrence.

Results of computer tomography-based adaptive brachytherapy in combination with whole-pelvic- and central-shielding-external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer

To evaluate treatment results and investigate predictors of local control. In this retrospective study of 236 patients with cervical cancer, we administered CT-based adaptive brachytherapy (BT) in combination with whole- pelvic (WP)- and central shielding (CS)- external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without chemotherapy. The study cohort comprised patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy between June 2013 and March 2019. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and late toxicity were evaluated. Predictive factors for LC were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Median doses of WP- and CS-EBRT and BT were 30.6 Gy The combination of WP- and CS-EBRT and CT-based IGBT with or without concurrent chemotherapy produced favorable LC outcomes with low rates of late toxicities for patients with small or medium-sized tumors. However, LC was less favorable for patients who had large T3 disease, and the use of CS requires caution in these patients.

Large volume was associated with increased risk of acute non-hematologic adverse events in the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: preliminary results of prospective phase I/II clinical trial

Abstract Objective This is the preliminary results of a multi-center prospective clinical trial evaluating the feasibility of the hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods Patients with FIGO stage IB2, IIA2, IIB, IIIA, IIIB and IVA uterine cervical cancer pretreatment width of which was ≥5 cm measured by MRI were eligible. Protocol therapy consisted of 30–30.6 Gy in 15–17 fractions of whole pelvic radiotherapy concurrent with weekly CDDP, followed by 24 Gy in 4 fractions of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial and pelvic radiotherapy with central shield up to 50–50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions. The primary endpoint of phase I part was that the rate of grade ≥ 3 acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial would be &amp;lt;10%. Results Between October 2015 and October 2019, 74 patients underwent primary registration, with 52 patients eventually proceeding to the secondary registration. The median pretreatment tumor width was 5.7 cm, and FIGO Stages were IB2 10, IIA2 2, IIB 20 and IIIB 20, respectively. The median high-risk clinical target volume D90 was 72.0 Gy (54.8–86.6 Gy, EQD2), rectum D2cc was 53.7 Gy (29.3–80.3 Gy) and bladder D2cc was 69.8 Gy (38.9–84.8 Gy). The rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial was 1.9% (1/52), and 17.3% (9/52) of patients experienced non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial of any grade. In multivariate analysis, high-risk clinical target volume ≥ 35 ml was associated with an increased risk of any grade of acute non-hematologic adverse events related to hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial (P = 0.036). Conclusion The feasibility and reproducibility of hybrid of intracavitary and interstitial were demonstrated from a multi-center prospective clinical trial.