Tommaso Bianchi

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: results from an international, multi-institutional study

This study assessed oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells (ITC) (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Patients with SLN-ITC diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 were identified from 19 centers worldwide, while SLN-negative patients were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 2014 and 2018. Only patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (low-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion ≥50%; high-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion <50%) were included. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated by grouping patients according to prognostic factors: SLN-ITC and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). SLN-ITC patients with post-operative observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone were compared with similar node-negative patients. Of the 166 patients included, those with simultaneous presence of SLN-ITC and LVSI were at higher risk of non-vaginal recurrence (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17 to 11.84], p = .01) compared with patients who were node-negative with no LVSI. Among the 122 patients (28 SLN-ITC, 94 node-negative) who underwent post-operative observation or VB alone, 1 isolated vaginal recurrence was documented in a node-negative patient, while non-vaginal recurrence occurred in 3 of 28 (10.7%) SLN-ITC and 7 of 94 (7.4%) node-negative patients. The median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range; 1.8-3.0) among the remaining 25 ITC patients and 2.8 years (interquartile range; 0.8-4.2) among the remaining 87 node-negative patients. There was no difference in non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7% to 100.0%] vs node-negative: 82.2% [95% CI 69.1% to 97.9%], p = .46) or overall survival (SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3 to 100.0] vs node-negative: 84.5% [95% CI 75.0 to 95.2], p = .28) between the 2 cohorts. In patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (including patients who received chemotherapy/external beam radiotherapy), the combination of SLN-ITC and LVSI was associated with worse prognosis compared with patients with no risk factors or only 1 risk factor. In the sub-group of patients who received post-operative observation or VB alone, SLN-ITC did not worsen prognosis relative to node-negative patients.

Outcomes of low-risk endometrial cancer with isolated tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, observational study (ENDO-ITC study)

It is unclear whether isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) adversely affect prognosis, especially in low-risk endometrial cancer. In a retrospective study, we showed a worse recurrence-free survival for low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs than the node-negative group. Our aim is to evaluate whether the likelihood of disease recurrence differs between a prospective cohort of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs and an historical cohort with negative SLNs. We hypothesize that patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs will have a worse recurrence-free survival than patients who are node-negative. This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with low-risk endometrial cancer with ITCs in the SLNs will be accrued. Observation only will be suggested after surgery. We will include patients with endometrial cancer undergoing pelvic SLN biopsy and ultra-staging with the following characteristics: endometrioid histology, grades 1 to 2, <50% myometrial invasion, without substantial/extensive lympho-vascular space invasion. ITCs in SLNs are defined as tumor cell aggregates ≤0.2 mm or <200 cells. The primary end point is recurrence-free survival, measured from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence, death, or last disease evaluation. With a sample size of 132 women with low-risk endometrial cancer and ITCs, a 1-sided log-rank test achieves 85% power at a 0.05 significance level to detect an HR of 2.1. The expected number of events during the study is 17.3. The study duration will be 60 months: 24 for enrollment and 36 for follow-up. The results are expected in 2029. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06689956.

The paradigm shift in advanced ovarian cancer: Outcomes of extensive primary cytoreductive surgery. A single-center retrospective analysis

The standard surgical treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma is primary debulking surgery (PDS) aiming to complete cytoreduction. The need to achieve complete cytoreduction has shifted the surgical paradigm to more complex procedures, whose impact on morbidity is controversial. The objective of this retrospective analysis is to explore the impact of extensive PDS on morbidity and oncologic outcomes in a real-world scenario. A retrospective single-center analysis was performed on 137 patients with advanced high-grade ovarian carcinoma (HGOC) who received PDS in 2015-2020. Patients treated in 2015-2017 (Group 1) were compared to patients treated in 2018-2020 (Group 2). The two periods were chosen according to the higher complexity of surgical procedures introduced in 2018. The increase in complete cytoreduction observed in Group2 (RD 0: 33 % vs 61 %, p = 0,008) was related to a higher surgical complexity (Aletti Score: 4 vs 6, p = 0,003) and did not reflect an increase in peri-operative complications (CCI: 20,9 vs 20,9, p = 0,11). After a median FUP of 44 months, PFS and OS at 24 months were 33,60 % vs 47,33 % (p = 0,288) and 72,10 % vs 80,37 % (p = 0,022) in Group 1 and 2, respectively. An extensive surgical effort leads to a significant increase in complete cytoreduction with acceptable morbidity. Arm-in-arm with novel maintenance therapies, it contributes to increasing the outcomes of patients with advanced HGOC.

Fertility-sparing vs hysterectomy for uterine STUMP: A pragmatic clinical study.

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) are rare neoplasms with unpredictable clinical behavior. Optimal management, particularly in reproductive-aged women, remains controversial, with limited data comparing the safety of fertility-sparing versus hysterectomy. This multicentre retrospective cohort study included women aged 18-85 with histologically confirmed STUMP treated at 17 Italian gynecologic oncology centers from 2010 to 2023. Patients underwent either fertility-sparing surgery (myomectomy or hysteroscopic resection) or definitive surgery (hysterectomy ± salpingo-oophorectomy). Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Median (range) follow-up was 51 (1-291) months. Among 401 women, 106 (26.4 %) received fertility-sparing treatment (mean [± SD] age: 35.3 ± 6.8 years) and 295 (73.6 %) underwent definitive surgery (mean [± SD] age: 47.7 ± 9.2). At total follow-up, recurrence occurred in 12.5 % of patients, predominantly within the pelvis. Median RFS was longer after definitive surgery than after fertility-sparing procedures (50.0 vs 42.5 months; HR 2.39 [95 % CI 1.36-4.19]), although this difference disappeared when benign (leiomyoma) recurrences were excluded (HR 1.74 [95 % CI 0.90-3.34]). At last available follow-up, 97.5 % of patients were alive, with no significant OS difference between treatment groups (HR 0.22 [95 % CI 0.27-1.79]). Outcomes were comparable across menopausal status and concurrent adnexal removal. Definitive surgery reduces recurrence risk, but long-term survival is similarly excellent after fertility-sparing surgery in appropriately selected women with STUMP. Conservative management represents a reasonable option for patients desiring fertility, provided they receive counseling regarding recurrence risk, diagnostic uncertainty, and the need for long-term surveillance.