Investigator

Tohru Morisada

Kyorin University

TMTohru Morisada
Papers(10)
Associations of Lipid…Maintenance therapy f…Assessing the antitum…Effects of a fertilit…Latest findings in ch…Serum <scp>CA125</scp…Validation of HPV tri…Quality indicators fo…Japan Society of Gyne…Successful Multidisci…
Collaborators(10)
Yoichi KobayashiSatoru NagaseYasuhisa TeraoFumio AsanoTsutomu TabataTsukasa BabaYasuyuki HirashimaYoshito TeraiHideki TokunagaHidemichi Watari
Institutions(9)
Kyorin UniversityYamagata University F…Juntendo UniversityTokyo Womens Medical …Iwate Medical Univers…Shizuoka Cancer CenterKobe UniversityTohoku Medical and Ph…Hokkaido University

Papers

Associations of Lipid Metabolism Abnormalities and Obesity With Endometriosis‐Associated Ovarian Cancer

ABSTRACT Aim To investigate the differences in lipid metabolism and obesity between patients with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) and ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), both of which are classified as endometriosis‐associated Type I ovarian cancers. Methods This retrospective study included 133 patients who underwent surgery for OEC ( n  = 50) or OCCC ( n  = 83) between 2010 and 2022. Preoperative serum lipid markers (total cholesterol [TC], low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL‐C], and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL‐C]) and body mass index (BMI) were compared between the two groups. Associations with menopausal status and disease stage were examined, and independent predictors were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. Results Patients with OEC had significantly higher TC (215 vs. 199.5 mg/dL, p  = 0.040), LDL‐C (139 vs. 120.6 mg/dL, p  = 0.026), and BMI (22.1 vs. 20.4 kg/m 2 , p  = 0.020) compared with those with OCCC. No significant differences were observed for HDL‐C. In premenopausal women, TC and LDL‐C were significantly higher in patients with OEC, whereas no intergroup differences were found in postmenopausal women. Among patients with OEC, those with advanced‐stage disease had higher TC and LDL‐C, whereas no stage‐related differences were observed in patients with OCCC. Multivariate analysis identified BMI and LDL‐C as independent factors associated with OEC. Conclusion Lipid metabolism abnormalities and obesity were more strongly associated with OEC than with OCCC, suggesting subtype‐specific metabolic mechanisms of carcinogenesis and progression. These findings highlight the importance of metabolic factors in OEC, warranting further prospective studies.

Maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer with a history of PARPi administration

This study explored new insights into the selection criteria for maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer by comparing the efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) and bevacizumab in patients with a history of PARPi administration. Between April 2014 and December 2024, 81 patients underwent maintenance therapy with either PARPi (52 patients) or bevacizumab (29 patients) at our institution. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after the end of the last chemotherapy treatment. The median PFS did not differ significantly between the PARPi and bevacizumab groups (9 vs. 12 months, p=0.942). Similarly, in the propensity score-matched cohort (15 pairs), no significant difference was observed between the PARPi and bevacizumab groups (p=0.444). In the PARPi group, a history of PARPi administration was associated with a significant difference in PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses (PARPi-naïve vs. PARPi-experienced: 12 vs. 4 months, p=0.002; hazard ratio=3.24, 95% confidence interval=1.56-6.69). In the bevacizumab group, a history of PARPi administration was not associated with a significant difference in PFS. Among patients with a history of PARPi administration, the bevacizumab group had a significantly better PFS than the PARPi group (PARPi rechallenge vs. bevacizumab: 4 vs. 12 months, p=0.042), and the proportion of patients experiencing platinum-resistant recurrence during maintenance therapy was higher in the PARPi rechallenge group (58.8%) than in the bevacizumab group (20.0%) (p=0.049). Maintenance therapy with bevacizumab may be more beneficial for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who have a history of PARPi administration.

Effects of a fertility-sparing re-treatment for recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a systematic literature review

To examine the effectiveness of progestin re-treatment for recurrent endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) following initial fertility-sparing treatment. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Endometrial Cancer Committee. Multiple search engines, including PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database, were searched in December 2021 using the keywords "Endometrial neoplasms," "Endometrial hyperplasia," "Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia," "Fertility preservation," "Progestins," AND "Recurrence." Cases describing progestin re-treatment for recurrent EIN, AH and EC were compared with cases that underwent conventional hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were survival and disease recurrence, and the secondary outcome was pregnancy. After screening 238 studies, 32 with results for recurrent treatment were identified. These studies included 365 patients (270 received progestin re-treatment and 95 underwent hysterectomy). Most progestin re-treatment involved medroxyprogesterone acetate or megestrol acetate (94.5%). Complete remission (CR) following progestin re-treatment was achieved in 219 (81.1%) cases, with 3-, 6- and 9-month cumulative CR rates of 22.8%, 51.7% and 82.6%, respectively. Progestin re-treatment was associated with higher risk of disease recurrence than conventional hysterectomy was (odds ratio [OR]=6.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.99-23.10), and one patient (0.4%) died of disease. Fifty-one (14.0%) women became pregnant after recurrence, and progestin re-treatment demonstrated a possibility of pregnancy (OR=2.48; 95% CI=0.94-6.58). This meta-analysis suggests that repeat progestin therapy is an effective option for women with recurrent EIN, AH and EC, who wish to retain their fertility.

Serum CA125 level as predictors of the efficacy of olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum‐sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

AbstractAimOvarian cancer is a gynecological malignancy with a poor prognosis. For platinum‐sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, maintenance therapy with poly‐ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors after chemotherapy is considered; however, olaparib treatment does not always lead to sufficient progression‐free survival (PFS). This study aimed to identify factors that predict the efficacy of maintenance therapy using olaparib in platinum‐sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.MethodsTwenty‐seven patients with platinum‐sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, who received initial treatment and showed complete or partial response to prior chemotherapy at our hospital, were included. The primary outcome was the time from the end of previous platinum‐based chemotherapy to disease progression (PFS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to generate time‐to‐event curves for PFS; multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.ResultsThe median PFS was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.3–15.8). Before olaparib administration, the median PFS was 12 months in the &lt;4.1 neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio group and 4 months in the ≥4.1 group, with PFS being significantly better in the &lt;4.1 group (log‐rank: p = 0.023). When comparing serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels, the median PFS was 13 months in the &lt;18 U/mL group and 6 months in the &gt;18 U/mL group (log‐rank: p = 0.022). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CA125 was the factor affecting PFS (hazard ratio: 4.85; 95% CI: 1.53–15.38).ConclusionsSerum CA125 levels at olaparib initiation in patients with platinum‐sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer may predict PFS as an effect of maintenance therapy using olaparib to treat recurrent disease.

Quality indicators for endometrial cancer care in Japan

The incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer are increasing globally, including in Japan. Quality of cancer care is promoted through guideline adherence. This study aimed to establish quality indicators (QIs) for endometrial cancer and explore the factors contributing to treatment nonadherence. QIs and pattern-of-care indicators (PCIs) were developed using the Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles modified Delphi method. QIs reflect desirable healthcare patterns, whereas PCIs address treatment areas with lacking evidence. Data from the Hospital-Based Cancer Registry and Diagnosis Procedure Combination Survey were used. Patients diagnosed or treated between January 1 and December 31, 2020 were included. The reasons for nonadherence were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing adherence, including age, body mass index, comorbidities, facilities, and recurrence risk. Of the 35 proposed QI candidates, 8 QIs and 9 PCIs were selected, predominantly focusing on surgical aspects. Adherence rates varied, with peritoneal lavage cytology being the highest (93.1%), and postoperative hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for patients aged <45 years being the lowest (30.9%), when focusing on process indicators. Reasons for nonadherence included patient preference and medical comorbidities as significant factors. Multivariate analysis highlighted age, clinical stage, and Barthel index as significant contributors to nonadherence. We developed QIs to comprehensively assess endometrial cancer treatment. Adherence rates are favorable; however, HRT has a low adherence rate. Factors leading to nonadherence include advanced age and incomplete activities of daily living, particularly in advanced stages.

Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2023 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasm

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm are revised from the 2018 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standardized care for uterine body neoplasm, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for uterine body neoplasm, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden on patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO guideline committee, based on a careful review of evidence from the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The main features of the 2023 revision are as follows: 1) The Guidelines Formulation Committee members were asked to understand Minds' medical guideline development method in advance. 2) The clinical question (CQ) was changed to Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome format as much as possible. 3) Introduced the "body of evidence," which summarizes the results of research reports collected for the CQs by outcome and study design, and the strength of evidence for each body of evidence was rated from levels A to D. 4) Introduction of systematic reviews in some CQs. 5) The strength of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, value and hope for patients, and clinical applicability were considered while drafting recommendations. Herein, we present the English version of the JSGO guidelines 2023 for the treatment of uterine body neoplasm.

10Papers
35Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsAdenocarcinoma, Clear CellEndometrial NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsEndometriosis