Investigator

Timothy J. Hoang

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

TJHTimothy J. Hoang
Papers(2)
Evolution and Co-occu…Microsatellite Instab…
Collaborators(10)
Britta WeigeltNadeem R Abu-RustumArnaud Da Cruz PaulaJorge S Reis‐FilhoPier SelenicaAlexia IasonosBeryl Manning-GeistCarol AghajanianClaire F. FriedmanDavid N. Brown
Institutions(1)
Memorial Sloan Ketter…

Papers

Evolution and Co-occurrence of PI3K Pathway Gene Mutations in Endometrial Carcinoma Molecular Subtypes at the Single-Cell Level

Abstract Purpose: The PI3K pathway is altered in >85% of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EEC), with multiple mutations commonly co-occurring. Yet, the therapeutic effects of single-agent PI3K pathway inhibitors have been limited. We used single-cell sequencing to determine whether co-occurring PTEN, PIK3CA, and/or PIK3R1 somatic mutations in EECs stratified by molecular subtype originated through convergent or linear evolution. Experimental Design: Banked frozen EECs with co-occurring PI3K pathway mutations of no specific molecular profile (NSMP; n = 5), mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd; n = 3), and POLE (n = 3) subtypes were selected for single-nucleus DNA sequencing targeting hotspot variants of 64 cancer-related genes and the PTEN, PIK3R1, and PIK3CA coding sequences. EEC cell lines and nonmalignant samples were used to define error rates and filter false-positive calls. Results: Single-nucleus analyses (n = 50,009 cells) revealed that in NSMP EECs, the co-occurring PIK3CA, PIK3R1, and/or PTEN mutations affected nearly all cells through linear evolution. MMRd EECs displayed higher levels of genetic heterogeneity, harboring PI3K pathway gene mutations in subsets of cells ranging from 3.9% to 96%. POLE EECs had the highest level of clonal diversity and harbored multiple, minor subclonal structures in all cases, through convergent evolution. We found a clear distinction between nearly clonal PI3K pathway gene alterations (>95%) and multiple, minor mutually exclusive subclones only affecting 1.4% to 27% of the tumor cells sequenced. Conclusions: Our exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis suggests that PI3K pathway alterations evolve distinctly in MMRd/POLE compared with NSMP EECs, which may have therapeutic consequences. Further studies on the signaling output and PI3K pathway inhibitor response in EECs with subclonal PI3K pathway alterations are warranted.

Microsatellite Instability–High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles

Abstract Purpose: Microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) endometrial carcinomas are underpinned by distinct mechanisms of DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D). We sought to characterize the clinical and genetic features of MSI-H endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic mutations in MMR genes or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1ph). Experimental Design: Of > 1,100 patients with endometrial cancer that underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing, 184 had MSI-H endometrial cancers due to somatic MMR mutations or MLH1ph, or harbored pathogenic germline MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic features, mutational landscape, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores were compared among MMR-D groups using nonparametric tests. Log-rank tests were used for categorical associations; Kaplan–Meier method and Wald test based on Cox proportional hazards models were employed for continuous variables and survival analyses. Results: Compared with patients with germline (n = 25) and somatic (n = 39) mutations, patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers (n = 120) were older (P < 0.001), more obese (P = 0.001) and had more advanced disease at diagnosis (P = 0.025). MLH1ph endometrial cancers were enriched for JAK1 somatic mutations as opposed to germline MMR-D endometrial cancers which showed enrichment for pathogenic ERBB2 mutations. MLH1ph endometrial cancers exhibited lower tumor mutational burden and TIL scores compared with endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic MMR mutations (P < 0.01). MLH1ph endometrial cancer patients had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on univariate analysis, but in multivariable models, stage at diagnosis remained the only predictor of survival. For stage I/II endometrial cancer, two-year PFS was inferior for patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers compared with germline and somatic MMR groups (70% vs. 100%, respectively). Conclusions: MLH1ph endometrial cancers likely constitute a distinct clinicopathologic entity compared with germline and somatic MMR-D ECs with potential treatment implications.

2Papers
32Collaborators