Timiya S Nolan

Associations of self-identified race and ethnicity and genetic ancestry with mortality among cancer survivors

Abstract Self-identified race and ethnicity (SIRE) and genetic ancestry are potentially associated with disparities in health outcomes; however, independent effects of SIRE and genetic ancestry on mortality in cancer survivors including when adjusting for multiple risk factors are understudied. Among 23 445 cancer survivors in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial, SIRE was associated with mortality among prostate, colorectal, lung, ovarian, and breast cancer survivors; genetic ancestry was associated with mortality among prostate, colorectal, and breast cancer survivors. Associations were strong when adjusting for age at cancer diagnosis, sex, and tumor characteristics but attenuated when adjusting for individual-level factors and population-level socioeconomic status. For example, mortality risk was higher among Black vs White prostate cancer survivors and African genetic ancestry vs European genetic ancestry, but associations were attenuated after multilevel adjustment. Results suggest that SIRE and genetic ancestry do not solely reflect biologic variation; rather, social factors may drive mortality differences by SIRE and genetic ancestry.

The ties that bind: Cancer history, communication, and screening intention associations among diverse families

Objective Breast and cervical cancers are screen-detectable; yet, challenges exist with ensuring uptake of mammography and Pap smear. Family, a central factor in developing knowledge to carry out health promotion behaviors, may be an asset to improving intention to screen among non-adherent women from underrepresented minority groups. We explored familial cancer; communication; and breast and cervical screening intention among non-adherent Black, Latina, and Arab women in the United States who participated in a randomized controlled trial of the Kin KeeperSM Cancer Prevention Intervention study. The intervention was a culturally-targeted breast and cervical cancer literacy tool for Black, Latina, and Arab women, consisting of two family-focused education sessions on the cancers, their screening guidelines, and risk-reducing health-related behaviors. Methods For this secondary analysis, we assessed family cancer history, family communication, and screening intention for breast and cervical cancer in age-eligible, non-adherent participants. Descriptive statistics examined sample characteristics of the intervention and control groups. Odds ratios were estimated from logistic regression modeling to assess the intervention and sample characteristic effects on screening intention. Results Of the 516 participants, 123 and 98 were non-adherent to breast and cervical cancer screening, respectively. The intervention (OR = 1.95 for mammography; OR = 1.62 for Pap smear) and highly communicative (OR = 2.57 for mammography; OR = 3.68 for Pap smear) families reported greater screening intention. Family history of cancer only increased screening intention for mammography (OR = 2.25). Conclusion Family-focused approaches supporting communication may increase breast and cervical cancer screening intention among non-adherent, underrepresented minority groups.