Tiermes Marina Martin

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective institutional review

Abstract Objective To evaluate the oncologic and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent both sentinel lymph node (SLN) and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) compared with those who underwent SLN alone at primary surgery. Methods From 2001 to 2022, women who underwent SLN biopsy for nodal staging were recruited. The group of women who underwent SLN biopsy and PLD (SLN + PLD group) was compared with the group who underwent SLN mapping alone (SLN group). Results 210 patients were evaluated (98 and 112 in each group). The overall SLN detection rate was 97.6%. Lymph node involvement was detected in 23 patients (11%), and the rate of positive SLN increased from 6.2 to 11% after final pathological examination. At a median follow-up of 80 months, the recurrence and mortality rates were 6.2 and 2.4%, respectively. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 93.7 and 97.2%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 98.9 and 99.0% in the SLN + PLD and SLN group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the Kaplan–Meier PFS (p = 0.471; HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.22–2.04) and OS (p = 0.228; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.03–2.53) curves between the groups. Conclusion Pending further confirmation from prospective trials, SLN biopsy appears to be an effective method of nodal assessment in early-stage cervical cancer. This technique does not appear to increase the risk of recurrence compared with complete PLD in selected patients and may offer a viable, less invasive alternative for accurate nodal staging.

A multimodal intervention program to improve sexual health and self-perceived quality of life in patients treated for cervical cancer: a randomized prospective study (PROVIDENCE trial)

Patients with cervical cancer treatment experience an impairment of sexual function and quality of life. This issue is usually underreported and undertreated, and evidence-based interventions are lacking. Prevention of sexual dysfunction is a crucial pillar in improving the quality of life of these patients. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention, encompassing prevention of vaginal dysfunction and patient education, on sexual function and quality of life in cervical cancer survivors utilizing patient-reported outcome measurements. Multi-institutional, randomized clinical trial where patients will be randomized 1:2 at diagnosis of initial or locally advanced cervical cancer to control arm or intervention arm. After treatment, control arm patients will undergo standard follow-up by their referring physician. The multimodal intervention for patients in the intervention group includes application of vaginal estrogens plus hyaluronic-acid cream along with use of vaginal vibrator, systematic evaluation of the need of systemic hormone replacement therapy and treatment if needed, and access to online content about sexuality, nutrition, sports and lifestyle habits. Through 4 appointments (at diagnosis, 1, 6, and 12 months after treatment), sexual health, vaginal trophism and self-perceived quality of life of patients in both arms will be assessed with validated questionnaires as female sexual function index (FSFI), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire 30, and Cx-24, Cervantes Scale, vaginal health index and vaginal thickness assessed by ultrasound. The major inclusion criteria will be patients aged ≥18 years with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-III cervical cancer treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint will be FSFI score 12 months after treatment, which will be compared between groups. Uni- and multivariate analysis will be performed to identify factors influencing sexual function recovery after treatment. The sample size will be of 120 eligible patients, who will be randomized to detect an improvement of 5.2 points in FSFI score. Complete accrual is estimated in March 2026. To date, the present study has no external funding. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06031493.

SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy. Patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.

Steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during minimal-invasive non-robotic cervical and endometrial sentinel lymph node surgery

Abstract Purpose The recently introduced tethered DROP-IN gamma probe has revolutionized the way robotic radioguided surgery is performed, fully exploiting the nature of steerable robotic instruments. Given this success, the current first-in-human study investigates if the DROP-IN can also provide benefit in combination with steerable non-robotic instruments during conventional laparoscopic surgery, showing equivalence or even benefit over a traditional rigid gamma probe. Methods The evaluation was performed in ten patients during laparoscopic cervical (n = 4) and endometrial (n = 6) cancer sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures. Surgical guidance was provided using the hybrid, or bi-modal, SLN tracer ICG-99mTc-nanocolloid. SLN detection was compared between the traditional rigid laparoscopic gamma probe, the combination of a DROP-IN gamma probe and a steerable laparoscopic instrument (LaproFlex), and fluorescence imaging. Results The gynecologists experienced an enlarged freedom of movement when using the DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination compared to the rigid laparoscopic probe, making it possible to better isolate the SLN signal from background signals. This did not translate into a change in the SLN find rate yet. In both cervical and endometrial cancer combined, the rigid probe and DROP-IN + LaproFlex combination provided an equivalent detection rate of 96%, while fluorescence provided 85%. Conclusion We have successfully demonstrated the in-human use of steerable DROP-IN radioguidance during laparoscopic cervical and endometrial cancer SLN procedures, expanding the utility beyond robotic procedures. Indicating an improved surgical experience, these findings encourage further investigation and consideration on a path towards routine clinical practice and improved patient outcome. Trial registration HCB/2021/0777 and NCT04492995; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04492995

A Multimodal Intervention Program to Improve Sexual Health and Self-perceived Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Cervical Cancer (PROVIDENCE)

The PROVIDENCE Trial aims to explore the improvement of sexual health and self-perceived health related quality of life (measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measures) through a multimodal intervention that includes patient education on healthy habits and the prevention of vaginal dysfunction using vaginal moisturizers and topical estrogens. To achieve this, a randomized design is proposed to assess sexual health and quality of life in patients treated for cervical cancer who undergo this intervention compared to those who receive standard care.