Tianyi Huang

Associations between common contraceptive use and circulating inflammatory biomarkers

Abstract Ovarian cancer incidence has declined in recent decades, due in part to oral contraceptive (OC) use and tubal ligation. However, intrauterine device (IUD) use has increasingly replaced OC use. As ovarian cancer is an inflammation-related disease, we examined the association of OC use, IUD use, and tubal ligation with plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. After adjusting for reproductive, hormonal, and lifestyle factors and mutual adjustment for other methods of contraception, there were no differences in inflammatory markers between ever and never use of each method. However, CRP levels decreased from an average of 30.4% (95% CI, –53.6 to 4.4) with every 5 years since initial IUD use (P-trend = .03), while CRP increased an average of 9.9% (95% CI, 5.7, 14.3) with every 5 years of use of OC (P-trend < .0001) as well as differences by body mass index and menopausal status. Our results suggest IUD use and tubal ligation are not associated with higher circulating inflammatory markers long term, although long duration of OC use may increase generalized inflammation, which may in part explain why its protective effect wanes over time. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.

Reproductive and Hormonal Factors and Risk of Ovarian Cancer by Tumor Dominance: Results from the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium (OC3)

Abstract Background: Laterality of epithelial ovarian tumors may reflect the underlying carcinogenic pathways and origins of tumor cells. Methods: We pooled data from 9 prospective studies participating in the Ovarian Cancer Cohort Consortium. Information on measures of tumor size or tumor dominance was extracted from surgical pathology reports or obtained through cancer registries. We defined dominant tumors as those restricted to one ovary or where the dimension of one ovary was at least twice as large as the other, and nondominant tumors as those with similar dimensions across the two ovaries or peritoneal tumors. Competing risks Cox models were used to examine whether associations with reproductive and hormonal risk factors differed by ovarian tumor dominance. Results: Of 1,058 ovarian cancer cases with tumor dominance information, 401 were left-dominant, 363 were right-dominant, and 294 were nondominant. Parity was more strongly inversely associated with risk of dominant than nondominant ovarian cancer (Pheterogeneity = 0.004). Ever use of oral contraceptives (OC) was associated with lower risk of dominant tumors, but was not associated with nondominant tumors (Pheterogeneity = 0.01). Higher body mass index was associated with higher risk of left-dominant tumors, but not significantly associated with risk of right-dominant or nondominant tumors (Pheterogeneity = 0.08). Conclusions: These data suggest that reproductive and hormonal risk factors appear to have a stronger impact on dominant tumors, which may have an ovarian or endometriosis origin. Impact: Examining the associations of ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor dominance may help elucidate the mechanisms through which these factors influence ovarian cancer risk.

Caregiver burden and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the Nurses’ Health Studies

Abstract Psychosocial stress may increase ovarian cancer risk and accelerate disease progression. We examined the association between caregiver burden, a common stressor, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We prospectively followed 67 724 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1992-2012) and 70 720 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (2001-2009) who answered questions on informal caregiving (ie, caregiving outside of work). Women who reported no informal caregiving were considered noncaregivers, while, among women who provided care outside of work, caregiver burden was categorized by time spent caregiving and perceived stress from caregiving. For the 34% of women who provided informal care for ≥15 hours per week, 42% described caregiving as moderately to extremely stressful. Pooled multivariate analyses indicated no difference in ovarian cancer risk for women providing ≥15 hours of care per week compared to noncaregivers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.18), and no association was evident for women who reported moderate or extreme stress from caregiving compared to noncaregivers (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75-1.22). Together with prior work evaluating job strain and ovarian cancer risk, our findings suggest that, when evaluating a stressor’s role in cancer risk, it is critical to consider how the stressor contributes to the overall experience of distress. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.