Taymaa May

Anastomotic diversion rates following integration of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer

To compare rates of diverting ileostomy in patients with ovarian cancer, undergoing cytoreduction with bowel resection before and after the acquisition of indocyanine green fluorescence angiographic scans for anastomotic perfusion assessment. A retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian cancer undergoing bowel resection during cytoreductive surgery between 2010 and 2021. We evaluated whether using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography impacted rates of diverting ileostomy. Baseline characteristics and rates of diversion were compared between those who had indocyanine green fluorescence assessment and those with bowel resection without anastomotic fluorescence assessment. Overall, 181 patients were included. Of whom, 84 (46%) underwent anastomotic fluorescence assessment following bowel resection, and 97 (54%) had bowel resection without assessment. Mean age of the cohort was 58.2 years and 132 (73%) had stage III disease. There was no difference between groups in rates of diverting ileostomy (41% vs 41%, p=1.0). In a univariable logistic regression, the odds of having an ileostomy were 2.92 times higher in patients undergoing primary surgery than in patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery (95% CI 1.25 to 6.85, p=0.013). The use of fluorescence angiography did not predict performing diverting ileostomy (OR=0.97, 95% CI (0.53 to 1.76), p=0.92). In this cohort, the simple introduction of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography had no impact on the rates of anastomotic diversion. Developing a systematic, reproducible diversion protocol with selection criteria that include fluorescence angiography is needed to assess the impact of this surgically innovative tool on the rates of anastomotic diversion in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Primary cytoreductive surgery compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with BRCA mutated advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer: 10 year survival analysis

Given the high response to platinum based chemotherapy in We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all stage III/IV Of 314 women with germline or somatic Primary cytoreductive surgery was associated with improved survival in women with stage III/IV

The impact of interval between primary cytoreductive surgery with bowel resection and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of women with advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter cohort study

Our aim was to determine if the time interval between bowel resection and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy impacts survival in advanced ovarian cancers. This was a retrospective cohort study using data from two cancer centers, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center in Seoul, South Korea. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV ovarian cancer that underwent large bowel resection during primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) were included. Ninety-one women were eligible of which the majority (90.1%) were diagnosed with high-grade serous cancer. The median interval from PCS to chemotherapy for all patients was 21 days (7-86 days). Patients were stratified into 3 groups: 1) Interval ≤14 days, 32 (35.2%) patients; 2) Interval between 15-28 days, 27 (29.6%) patients; and 3) Interval between 29-90 days, 32 (35.2%) patients. Surgical procedures and postoperative outcomes were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that PCS to chemotherapy interval of 2-4 weeks, younger age, and completion of 4 or more adjuvant chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors of favorable overall survival. Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy between 2 to 4 weeks after PCS with bowel resection may improve survival outcomes in women with advanced ovarian cancer by maximizing the benefit of PCS plus adjuvant chemotherapy.