Tanitra Tantitamit

Prognostic Value of The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Platelet Count for Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

To study the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and platelet count in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (PS-ROC). This was a retrospective study on a database of platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients who received treatment at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC) between January 2010 and December 2020. The patients' demographic data, surgical factors, pathological factors, laboratory findings, and response to treatment were reviewed from the patients' medical records. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate and Cox regression model. In total, 56 patients were recruited in this study. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 33 (95%CI 23-43) and 11 (95%CI 8-16) months, respectively. Survival analysis showed a high PLR was associated with decreased OS compared with low value but no significant difference in PFS. High NLR was associated with poor OS and PFS. There was no association between the platelet count and survival outcome (OS and PFS). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the NLR, PLR, and platelet count were not significant prognostic factors for survival outcome. However, low hemoglobin and a decreased disease-free interval were significantly associated with poor PFS. A white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 8,000 cells/mm3 was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival (Adjusted HR 7.64; 95%CI: 2.21-26.42; p-value = 0.001). The NLR, PLR, and platelet count were not associated with both the OS or PFS in patients with PS-ROC. However, the WBC level is an easy, readily available, and economical way to predict survival outcomes in PS-ROC patients and may help physicians to tailor therapeutic interventions in the future.

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Platinum- Resistant or Refractory Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer and Peritoneal Cancer

To determine the survival outcomes and prognostic factors of the patients with recurrent platinumresistant and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), tubal, and peritoneal cancer. Women with recurrent platinum-resistant and refractory EOC, tubal and peritoneal cancer who received treatment at the HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC) between January 2010 and December 2019 were included. Demographic data, serum marker, surgical factors, pathological factors and response of treatment were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier was used to calculate survival outcome. Forty patients were recruited in this study (platinum-resistant 24 patients and refractory 16 patients). The median survival times were 19 and 21 months in and platinum-resistant and platinumrefractory patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in overall survival according to age, comorbidity, tumor grading, primary treatment, and secondary surgery. However, histology of clear cell carcinoma may associate with increased risk of death. The median overall survival of patients with clear cell carcinoma, serous carcinoma, and others were 14.4, 22.9, and 32.2, respectively (p = 0.003). Almost 10 years, the survival rate of the patients in these group has not increased despite new treatments option. Novel strategies should be considered in National policy of the treatment for ovarian cancer in our country.

Cost-effectiveness of HPV catch-up vaccination program in women aged 13–24 years in a middle income country

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of expanding the current routine human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program to women aged 13-24 years in Thailand. A Markov model of HPV infection and cervical cancer was adapted. We compared catch-up cohorts of 13- to 24-year-old women vaccinated with (1) bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix Compared to no vaccination, the catch-up vaccination programs decreased the incidence of cervical cancer cases and cancer-related deaths 44.8%-63.4% over a lifetime. Vaccinating with 2vHPV (Cervarix All catch-up vaccination programs for women aged 13 to 24 years produce additional health benefits and reduce healthcare costs. Vaccination with 9vHPV was considered the most cost-effective option.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-dose or 2-dose of bivalent, quadrivalent, or nonavalent HPV vaccine in a low/middle-income country setting

To compare the health impact and economic benefits among individuals who did not receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to those who received a single dose, or 2 doses. The comparison was stratified by 4 types of vaccine in conjunction with primary HPV screening in a low/middle-income country setting. A Markov model was employed to simulate HPV infection and cervical cancer in a cohort of 100,000 12-year-old girls free of HPV. The study scrutinized 9 strategies: 1 dose and 2 doses of 2vHPV (Cervarix All vaccination programs yielded 41,298-71,057 QALYs gained accompanied by cost savings of 14,914,186-19,821,655 USD compared to no vaccination. Administering 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine emerged as the most cost-effective strategy, boasting 406 USD/QALY, within a lower willingness to pay threshold. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated an 80% probability of the cost-effectiveness of the 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine regimen. Furthermore, uncertainty around the costs of vaccination and vaccine efficacy exerted the most substantial influence on the cost-effectiveness findings. Oping for 2 doses of 9vHPV vaccine in conjunction with a primary HPV screening represents the most cost-effective option for implementing a school-based HPV vaccination program targeting 12-year-old girls in Thailand. Such findings provide valuable insights for policymakers in the realm of cervical cancer prevention.

Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Screening Strategies and Triage With Cytology or Dual Stain for Cervical Cancer

To identify the optimal cost-effective strategy for cervical cancer screening program in Thailand by comparing the different algorithms which based on the use of primary human papilloma virus (HPV) assay. We use a Microsoft Excel–based spreadsheet to calculate the accumulated cases of preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer and the budget impact of each screening program. The model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of 3 screening strategies: pooled HPV test with reflex liquid-based cytology triage, HPV genotyping with reflex p16/ki67 dual stain cytology, and pooled HPV test with dual stain. The main outcomes were the total cost, incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Strategy entailing primary HPV genotyping and reflex dual stain cytology is the least costly strategy (total cost US$37 893 407) and provides the similar QALY gained compared to pooled high-risk HPV testing with reflex dual stain (Average QALY 24.03). Pooled HPV test with reflex dual staining is more costly compared to strategy without reflex dual staining. The ICER was US$353.40 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model is sensitive to the cost of dual stain and the cost of cancer treatment. Decreasing the incidence of cervical cancer case and increasing the QALYs can be successful by using dual stain cytology as the triage test for pooled HPV test or HPV genotyping. The result of our analysis favors the use of HPV genotyping with the reflex dual stain as it offers the most QALY at the lowest cost.