Investigator

Takahito Ashihara

Department manager · Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Gynecology

TATakahito Ashihara
Papers(2)
Synchronous ovarian a…Possible overestimati…
Collaborators(10)
Yoshihide InayamaYukiko TagaYukio YamanishiIkuko EmotoKazuki YamanoKentaro IshidaKen YamaguchiKota YamauchiMaki UmemiyaMasaki Mandai
Institutions(6)
Osaka Red Cross Hospi…Kyoto UniversityUnknown Institutionjapanese red cross wa…Kyoto Medical CenterKitano Hospital

Papers

Possible overestimation of treatment effects of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective propensity-score weighted multi-center cohort study

The treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) reported in previous studies may have been overestimated owing to confounding factors. This study aimed to investigate the treatment effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PeNPAN) in early-stage OCCC, with careful adjustment for potential confounders. This retrospective multi-center cohort study involved women with preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. We included patients who underwent surgery for OCCC between 2005 and 2019 at 11 affiliated institutions. The exposure (PeNPAN) group comprised patients who underwent PeNPAN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, hazard ratios (HRs) of lymphadenectomy for DFS were estimated using unadjusted and propensity score-weighted Cox regression models and biased models applied in previous studies. To identify strong confounders, we further examined factors associated with recurrence that differed between the groups. We analyzed 304 women who underwent surgery for preoperatively suspected stage I OCCC. The unadjusted HR for DFS was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.36-1.09; p=0.10), and the propensity-score adjusted HR was 0.82 (95% CI=0.42-1.58; p=0.55). The biased model showed a statistically significant HR of 0.59 (95% CI=0.36-1.00; p=0.048). Adhesions in the Douglas' pouch and cardiovascular disease were associated with recurrence and were more prevalent in the control group, suggesting potential confounders. After adjusting for potential confounders, the observed treatment effects of lymphadenectomy in the biased models were no longer statistically significant. Future investigations should carefully account for possible confounders, including intraoperative adhesions and comorbidities.

1Works
2Papers
14Collaborators

Positions

Department manager

Kyoto Katsura Hospital · Gynecology

Researcher

Kindai University Hospital · Obstetrics and Gynecology