Tadahiro Shoji

Clinical and prognostic insights into Trousseau’s syndrome in gynecologic malignancies: a multicenter study

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-combined single-agent chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer that recurred during PARP inhibitor treatment

Currently, there are no reports on the subsequent treatment of patients with ovarian cancer who exhibited platinum-resistant recurrence during treatment with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. This retrospective study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (BEV) in such patients. The efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated in 16 patients with ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer diagnosed with platinum-resistant recurrence during PARP inhibitor treatment between April 2019 and June 2025. Chemotherapy was administered with paclitaxel alone or nogitecan alone in combination with BEV and generally continued until the disease progressed. The median number of single-agent chemotherapy cycles with BEV was 6 (range: 1-20). The objective response and disease control rates were 31.3% and 75.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival 2 and post-progression survival were 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.0-6.0] and 17 months (95%CI = 10.0-29.0), respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematological toxicities were observed, including leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia in 7, 9, 1, and 3 patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities included hypertension in three patients and nausea, vomiting, fatigue, proteinuria, thrombosis, ileus, and heart failure in one patient each. None of the patients discontinued chemotherapy because of adverse events or treatment-related deaths. BEV-combined single-agent chemotherapy has potential efficacy even in the challenging setting of platinum-resistant recurrence during PARP inhibitor treatment of ovarian cancer.

Cytokine dynamics and quality of life: unraveling the impact of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy in ovarian cancer patients

Abstract Background The quality of life (QOL) of ovarian cancer patients is often impaired by refractory ascites. Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is a palliative treatment for refractory ascites, but adverse events, such as fever, are problematic. Several cytokines have been suggested to be responsible for the adverse events, but they have not been investigated in detail. Thus, we comprehensively analyzed cytokines in ascites fluid (AF) and serum before and after CART to determine the influence of cytokines on the safety and efficacy of CART. Methods Thirteen ovarian cancer patients with refractory malignant ascites who underwent CART were enrolled. We comprehensively analyzed 27 cytokines in AF and serum before and after CART. Simultaneously, vital measurements, blood tests, adverse event recordings, and QOL assessments were performed to examine the relationships between the cytokines in AF and serum. Results Interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, IL-10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels were increased in the concentrated AF and in the serum immediately after reinfusion, but they decreased after 24 h. Body temperature also increased immediately after reinfusion, and decreased after 24 h. The CRP level at 24 h after reinfusion was increased, and was positively correlated with the IL-6 level. A QOL assessment using the Cancer Fatigue Scale revealed significantly lower scores after CART. Conclusions The results indicate that the cytokine-induced fever and increased inflammatory response after CART were temporary, and that CART is safe. Additionally, QOL improved after CART. Thus, CART appears safe and effective for treating patients with refractory cancerous ascites.

Safe Trocar Placement by Transvaginal Endoscopic Insertion in Robot‐Assisted Surgery for Endometrial Cancer With Umbilical Incisional Hernia and Prior Mesh Repair: Two Case Reports

ABSTRACT We report two cases of endometrial cancer with umbilical incisional hernia or prior mesh repair, in which robot‐assisted surgery was safely performed using transvaginal laparoscope insertion. Both patients had prior abdominal surgeries, and preoperative imaging raised concerns about adhesions or mesh near the umbilicus, making conventional trocar insertion risky. A laparoscope was inserted via the posterior vaginal fornix, allowing real‐time intra‐abdominal visualization and safe port placement under direct vision. In one case, mesh and adhesions were confirmed at the umbilicus. In the other, no adhesions were found within the hernia sac despite being suspected preoperatively, whereas dense adhesions were identified at Palmer's point, which could not be fully characterized by imaging alone. These cases highlight the limitations of relying solely on imaging and underscore the utility of intraoperative visual assessment. Transvaginal scope insertion offers a simple, reproducible method to enhance trocar safety. To our knowledge, no previous reports have described this technique used solely for observation in robot‐assisted surgery for endometrial cancer.

Treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer using immune checkpoint inhibitors

Doxorubicin + cisplatin and paclitaxel + carboplatin are standard chemotherapy regimens for endometrial cancer. The development of PD-1 and PDL-1 antibody drugs has led to the use of these agents for endometrial cancer in other countries. The KEYNOTE-775 trial for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer demonstrated the benefits of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination therapy, and the results of this trial led to the approval of its coverage for recurrent cancer by the Japanese health insurance system. Currently, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is transitioning from second-line to first-line therapy. In a global randomized phase III study, the drugs dostarlimab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab, which are not yet approved in Japan, showed better results in the study arms than in the control arm. Additionally, biomarkers have been developed for endometrial cancer, enabling gynecologists to pursue treatment options based on the biomarkers detected for better treatment outcomes. In this article, we review the clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer (ACE) trial: A randomized phase II study for advanced endometrial carcinoma

AbstractThis study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of three postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for endometrial cancer. Endometrioid cancer patients with intermediate‐risk stage I and II or high‐risk stage III and IV disease were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either paclitaxel‐epirubicin‐carboplatin (TEC), paclitaxel‐anthracycline (doxorubicin)‐carboplatin (TAC), or dose‐dense paclitaxel‐carboplatin (ddTC). The primary end‐point was the completion rate (CRate) of six cycles of treatment. The secondary end‐points were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). One hundred and one patients were treated as follows: 33 received TEC, 33 TAC, and 35 ddTC. The CRates for TEC, TAC, and ddTC were 94%, 64%, and 69%, respectively (P = .005). The TEC CRate was significantly higher than for the other two groups. However, the PFS and OS outcomes were not statistically different between the three groups. The 2‐year survival rates were 94%, 97%, and 97% for TEC, TAC, and ddTC, respectively. When compared to the current standard treatments for endometrial cancer, TEC is a promising candidate for a phase III trial based on its significantly superior CRate and equivalent PFS and OS. This study is registered with UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000008911).

Comparison of treatment outcomes between first-line chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (Tohoku gynecologic cancer unit: TGCU-RS001 study)

Outcomes with and without bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in Japanese-only ovarian cancer patients have not been reported. In this study, we report a retrospective study conducted at the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. The study included 453 patients with stage III/IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups: bevacizumab (168 patients) and without bevacizumab (285 patients). The primary endpoint was the rate of platinum-resistant recurrence and the secondary endpoints were the antitumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. The objective response rates for patients with measurable diseases treated with and without bevacizumab were 84.5% and 73.0%, respectively (P = 0.0066). Platinum-resistant recurrence in the groups treated with and without bevacizumab was noted in 31 (18.4%) and 111 (38.6%) patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median progression-free survival for the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups was 23 and 15 months, respectively (P = 0.0002), and the median overall survival was not reached and 49 months, respectively (P = 0.0005). Hypertension of grade 3 or higher was observed in 21 patients (12.5%) in the bevacizumab group (P < 0.001), and proteinuria was observed in 18 patients (10.7%) and 1 patient (0.3%) in the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Intestinal perforation was observed in only one patient (0.6%) in the bevacizumab group. Combination and maintenance with bevacizumab in primary chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer was effective in reducing platinum-resistant recurrence rates and prolonging progression-free and overall survival.

Efficacy and safety of standard of care with/without bevacizumab for platinum‐resistant ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023

AbstractWe investigated the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with platinum‐resistant ovarian cancer whose disease had progressed after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. In this multicenter, open‐label, phase II trial (JGOG3023), patients were randomized 1:1 to a single‐agent chemotherapy alone (either pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [40 or 50 mg/m2 administered intravenously], topotecan [1.25 mg/m2 intravenously], paclitaxel [80 mg/m2 intravenously], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2 intravenously]) or single‐agent chemotherapy + bevacizumab (15 mg/m2 intravenously). The primary endpoint was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS) according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and response rate according to Gynecological Cancer Intergroup cancer antigen 125 criteria. In total, 103 patients were allocated to chemotherapy (n = 51) or chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 52). Median investigator‐assessed PFS was 3.1 and 4.0 mo in each group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32‐0.90, P = .0082). Median OS was 11.3 and 15.3 mo in each group, respectively (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.38‐1.17, P = .1556). Respective ORRs were 13.7% and 25.0% (P = .0599) and response rates were 16.7% and 21.4% (P = .8273). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment‐related AEs was 42.0% in the chemotherapy group and 54.9% in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab group; AEs were well tolerated, with only 2 and 12 events leading to discontinuation of therapy, respectively. Bevacizumab was effective beyond progressive disease and AEs were manageable. The observed improvement in PFS requires further verification.

Peripheral blood lymphocyte and eosinophil dynamics with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab in cervical cancer

Cervical cancer poses a significant global health burden, particularly in its metastatic and recurrent forms, for which treatment options are limited. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as pembrolizumab have improved outcomes, predictive markers for efficacy are still undefined. This retrospective study investigated changes in peripheral blood eosinophil and lymphocyte counts as potential prognostic indicators in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer undergoing pembrolizumab-based therapy. Forty-one patients treated with pembrolizumab plus taxane-platinum chemotherapy (± bevacizumab) were analyzed. Peripheral blood eosinophil and lymphocyte counts were measured before and 3 weeks after treatment initiation. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, and log-rank tests. Immune-related adverse events ≥ grade 2 emerged as a significant independent factor associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in this cohort (p = 0.014). Patients with decreased eosinophil count ratios post-treatment demonstrated longer PFS, particularly among those with recurrence and those who had received prior radiotherapy (p = 0.0001). Conversely, increased lymphocyte count ratios correlated with improved PFS in patients undergoing primary treatment (p = 0.018). Changes in peripheral eosinophil and lymphocyte counts following pembrolizumab initiation may serve as predictive indicators of treatment efficacy in specific cervical cancer subgroups. Incorporating these hematologic parameters could help optimize patient selection and therapeutic strategies. Further research is needed to clarify their role as predictive markers of pembrolizumab efficacy in cervical cancer.

Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

Immunotherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer Using Checkpoint Inhibitors: Future Directions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated marked clinical effects worldwide, and “cancer immunotherapy” has been recognized as a feasible option for cancer treatment. Significant treatment responses have already been attained for malignant melanoma and lung cancer, ahead of gynecologic cancer. In cervical cancer, however, results are only available from phase II trials, not from phase III trials. Cervical cancer is a malignant tumor and is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Since the introduction of angiogenesis inhibitors, treatment for recurrent and advanced cervical cancers has improved in the past five years, but median overall survival is 16.8 months for advanced cervical cancer, and all-stage five-year overall survival rate is 68%, indicating that treatment effects remain inadequate. For this reason, the development of new therapeutic approaches is imperative. We describe herein the KEYNOTE-158 and CheckMate 358 clinical trials, which were conducted for cervical cancer, and discuss future directions, including potential combinations with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), as noted for other types of cancer.

Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: In October 2018, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) revised its classification of advanced stages of cervical cancer. The main points of the classification are as follows: stage IIIC is newly established; pelvic lymph node metastasis is stage IIIC1; and para-aortic lymph node metastasis is stage IIIC2. Currently, in Japan, radical hysterectomy is performed in advanced stages IA2 to IIB of FIGO2014, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended for patients with positive lymph nodes. However, the efficacy of CCRT is not always satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and postoperative CCRT in stage IIIC1 patients. Materials and Methods: Of the 40 patients who had undergone a radical hysterectomy at Iwate Medical University between January 2011 and December 2016 and were pathologically diagnosed as having positive pelvic lymph nodes, 21 patients in the adjuvant CT group and 19 patients in the postoperative CCRT group were compared. Results: The 5 year survival rates were 77.9% in the CT group and 74.7% in the CCRT group, with no significant difference. There was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between the two groups. There was no significant difference between CT and CCRT in postoperative adjuvant therapy in the new classification IIIC1 stage. Conclusions: The results of the prospective Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 1082 study are pending, but the present results suggest that CT may be a treatment option in rural areas where radiotherapy facilities are limited.