Sukru Cebi

The relationship between histopathological data and molecular alterations with oncological outcomes in endometrioid-type endometrial cancers and a novel POLE mutation

To identify molecular subgroups in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), evaluate their association with clinicohistopathological characteristics, and define low-intermediate risk groups by integrating these parameters. This retrospective-cohort study included 1,040 patients who underwent surgery between January 2000 and June 2022. Among 900 EEC cases, 72 recurred. Patients with tumor recurrence (n=62) and those without (n=52) were matched. POLE exons 9-14 were examined using Sanger sequencing. p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were assessed via immunohistochemistry. The molecular subgroups were POLE mutation (POLE-mut) 5%, mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-d) 43%, p53 mutation (p53-mut) 5%, and non-specific molecular profile (NSMP) 42%. 5% of cases displayed multiple molecular mutations. POLE-mut were more prevalent in high-grade tumors (p=0.026). MMR-d tumors exhibited higher rates of lymphovascular space invasion and myometrial invasion ≥50% (p=0.032, p=0.020). No recurrences occurred in POLE-mut tumors (p=0.002), while MMR-d was significantly associated with recurrence (p=0.002). Median disease-free survival (DFS) for MMR-d, p53-mut, and NSMP were 34, 49, and 107 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for these groups was 128, 102, and 181 months. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis employing the Backward-Stepwise method identified stage as the strongest predictor of DFS, and grade and stage as predictors of OS. POLE mutations were linked to the most favorable molecular prognostic factor. NSMP cases showed the longest DFS and OS, while p53-mut had the shortest OS. Except for POLE, molecular features alone were insufficient for establishing risk groups, highlighting the continued importance of histopathology in EEC management.

Comparison of oncologic outcome of preoveratively presumed low-risk endometrial cancer patients who underwent only bilateral pelvic sentinel lymph node (SLN) removal and those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy in addition to bilateral pelvic SLN removal: Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group (TRSGO-SLN-009)

We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with bilateral sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) detection and removed with those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) in addition to bilateral SLNs removal. This multicenter, retrospective study included cases of endometrioid type, grade I-II endometrial cancer, in which bilateral SLNs were detected and removed. Patients who had only bilateral SLNs detected and removed (group I) and patients who had bilateral SLNs detected and removed and subsequent additional bilateral PLA (group II) were included in the evaluation. In group I (n=216), SLN metastasis rate was 5.5% and in group II (n=251), it was 10.3%. The low-volume disease detection rate was 4.6% in group I and 4.8% in group II. In group II, in patients with SLN macrometastasis had also 28.6% non-SLN macrometastasis. No false-negative results occurred in group II. Recurrence was detected 1.8% in group I and 5% in group II; however, there was no significant difference (p=0.083). Disease-free survival and overall survival, were almost same between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]=2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.681-6.588; p=0.187) and (HR=1.531; 95% CI=0.392-5.975; p=0.537), respectively. SLN mapping, ultrastaging, and immunohistochemical staining can identify low-volume metastases that may not be identified with classic lymphadenectomy and hematoxylin & eosin staining. It has been observed that adding PLA beyond SLN mapping did not provide an additional positive contribution to survival. For endometriod type grade I-II patients, detection of bilateral SLNs in both hemipelvis only, if detectable, is an adequate approach.