Stephanie Siegmund

Assessment and classification of sex cord‐stromal tumours of the testis: recommendations from the testicular sex cord‐stromal tumour (TESST) group, an Expert Panel of the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)

AimsTesticular sex cord‐stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are relatively rare, accounting for ~5% of all testicular neoplasms. They were historically classified into Leydig cell tumour, Sertoli cell tumour, granulosa cell tumour, and unclassified sex cord‐stromal tumour. More recently, classification was expanded to incorporate additional histologic types, including some associated with inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. However, the classification of TSCSTs still relies entirely on morphology, with some tumour types being defined based on their resemblance to ovarian counterparts. In recent years, molecular studies have identified drivers and genomic alterations associated with aggressive behaviour and progression; however, these findings have not yet impacted classification and management.Methods and resultsUnder sponsorship of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) and the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS), a group of genitourinary pathologists was assembled in 2023 with the aim of assessing how to use these new data to improve the classification and management of TSCSTs.ConclusionsThis paper summarizes the recommendations derived from the consensus activities and the first meeting of the testicular sex cord‐stromal tumour (TESST) group (held at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA, 3/23/2024).

STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific marker for STK11 adnexal tumours

AimsSTK11 adnexal tumour is a rare, recently described malignant neoplasm that is associated with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. [Correction added on 3 October 2024, after first online publication: ‘ST11’ in preceding sentence has been corrected to ‘STK11’ in this version.] It predominantly originates from the para‐adnexal soft tissues and often shows secondary involvement of the fallopian tube and ovary. STK11 adnexal tumours have a broad differential diagnosis due to their variable morphology and non‐specific immunoprofile, and diagnostic confirmation currently requires sequencing to identify an STK11 mutation. We investigate the diagnostic utility of STK11 (LKB1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a cohort of STK11 adnexal tumours and morphological mimics.Methods and resultsIHC for STK11 was performed on 122 tumours, including 17 STK11 adnexal tumours and 105 morphological mimics (10 female adnexal tumours of Wolffian origin, 22 adult granulosa cell tumours, 10 juvenile granulosa cell tumours, four Sertoli–Leydig cell tumours, two Leydig cell tumours, one Sertoli cell tumour, one steroid cell tumour, four extra‐ovarian sex cord‐stromal tumours, 16 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, eight tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinomas, five ovarian mesonephric‐like adenocarcinomas, 14 ovarian carcinosarcomas, five peritoneal malignant mesotheliomas, two pelvic plexiform leiomyomata and one ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumour). All STK11 adnexal tumours showed complete loss of cytoplasmic staining for STK11. All other tumour types showed retained cytoplasmic staining, except for one endometrioid carcinoma with mucinous differentiation which showed complete loss of STK11 expression and a high‐grade serous carcinoma with subclonal loss.ConclusionsSTK11 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing STK11 adnexal tumour from its histological mimics, and can obviate the need for confirmatory molecular studies in the appropriate morphological context.