Stefano Di Berardino

Value of frozen section to tailor surgical staging in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

Frozen section (FS) has been shown to have high accuracy in determining ovarian malignancy. However, its utility in guiding surgical approaches, particularly, lymph node staging, for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the post-test positive probability of FSs in identifying cases requiring lymph node or peritoneal staging. The secondary aims were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy assessments. This retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing surgery for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer with FS performed on ovarian masses between July 2007 and March 2023 at a tertiary center. The FS results were compared with the final histology (gold standard paraffin sections). The FS cases were categorized based on further actions as follows: lymph node staging (type A), peritoneal staging only (type B), or no additional procedures (type C). The patients were divided into group 1 (requiring lymph node and peritoneal staging) and group 2 (requiring only peritoneal staging). A comparison between specialized and general pathology diagnoses was also performed. Incorrect FS assessments were classified as under-diagnosed or over-diagnosed. Of the 715 patients, group 1 had appropriate staging in 425 of 447 cases, with 4.9% over-treatment. In group 2, staging was correct in 109 of 195 cases, with 44.1% under-treatment. For type A FSs, the post-test positive probability was 95% (95% CI 93% to 97%), with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 76.4%, 86.1%, and 78.6%, respectively. For type B FSs, the post-test positive probability was 56% (95% CI 50% to 61%), with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 68.6%, 84.5%, and 81%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the agreement between the specialized and general pathology groups (p = 0.92). Frozen sections suggestive of a cancer diagnosis requiring peritoneal and lymph node staging in a population with apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer are highly reliable. In the case of FSs suggesting only peritoneal staging, malignancy is frequently underestimated.

Sentinel-node biopsy in apparent early stage ovarian cancer: final results of a prospective multicentre study (SELLY)

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of sentinel-lymph-node mapping compared with the gold standard of systematic lymphadenectomy in detecting lymph node metastasis in apparent early stage ovarian cancer. Multicenter, prospective, phase II trial, conducted in seven centers from March 2018 to July 2022. Patients with presumed stage I-II epithelial ovarian cancer planned for surgical staging were eligible. Patients received injection of indocyanine green in the infundibulo-pelvic and, when feasible, utero-ovarian ligaments and sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed. Histopathological examination of all nodes was performed including ultra-staging protocol for the sentinel lymph node. 174 patients were enrolled and 169 (97.1 %) received study interventions. 99 (58.6 %) patients had successful mapping of at least one sentinel lymph node and 15 (15.1 %) of them had positive nodes. Of these, 11 of 15 (73.3 %) had a correct identification of the disease in the sentinel lymph node; 7 of 11 (63.6 %) required ultra-staging protocol to detect nodal metastasis. Four (26.7 %) patients with node-positive disease had a negative sentinel-lymph-node (sensitivity 73.3 % and specificity 100.0 %). In a multicenter setting, identifying sentinel-lymph nodes in apparent early stage epithelial ovarian cancer did not reach the expected sensitivity: 1 of 4 patients might have metastatic lymphatic disease unrecognized by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy. Nevertheless, 35.0 % of node positive patients was identified only thanks to ultra-staging protocol on sentinel-lymph-nodes.

External beam radiotherapy boost versus surgical debulking followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic lymph nodes in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to assess disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity of two therapeutic strategies for treating bulky lymph nodes on imaging in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC): radiotherapy boost versus surgical debulking followed by radiotherapy. We performed a systematic review of studies published up to October 2023. We selected studies including patients with LACC treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost or lymph node debulking followed by EBRT (with or without boost). We included two comparative (included in the meta-analysis) and nine non-comparative studies. The estimated 3-year recurrence rate was 28.2% (95%CI:18.3-38.0) in the EBRT group and 39.9% (95%CI:22.1-57.6) in the surgical debulking plus EBRT group. The estimated 3-year DFS was 71.8% and 60.1%, respectively (p = 0.19). The estimated 3-year death rate was 22.2% (95%CI:11.2-33.2) in the EBRT boost group and 31.9% (95%CI:23.3-40.5) in the surgical debulking plus EBRT group. The estimated 3-year OS was 77.8% and 68.1%, respectively (p = 0.04). No difference in lymph node recurrence between the two comparative studies (p = 0.36). The meta-analysis of the two comparative studies showed no DFS difference (p = 0.13) but better OS in the radiotherapy boost group (p = 0.006). The incidence of grade≥3 toxicities (ranging 0-50%) was not different between the two approaches in the two comparative studies (p = 0.31). No DFS and toxicity difference when comparing EBRT boost with surgical debulking of enlarged lymph nodes and EBRT in patients with cervical cancer was evident. Radiotherapy boost had better OS. Further investigation is required to better understand the prognostic role of surgical lymph node debulking in light of radiotherapy developments.

Patent Blue SLN in Early Ovarian Cancer Prospective Study (FIGO I-II) Evaluating Patent Blue SLN Mapping. Injection Into IP/UO Ligaments in Situ. Goals: Assess Feasibility and Accuracy vs Standard Lymphadenectomy to Minimize Surgical Morbidity

the standard of care in case of early ovarian cancer (stage I or II) is a complete surgery. This surgery includes : hysterectomy (remove of the uterus), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (remove of the adnexa), omentectomy (remove of the epiploon), bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy (remove of pelvic lymph nodes) and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (remove of para-aortic lymph nodes). This procedure is diagnostic, curative and prognostic surgery. In fact, it allows us provider care giver to stratify the stage of the cancer, hence we give the appropriate adjuvant therapy. However, this surgery, especially the extended lymphadenectomy, is associated with some risks: lymphocele, vessel injury, blood loss, morbidity, long recovery period ... In order to reduce these risks, we propose a sentinel lymph node biopsy. This intervention allows us to detect first lymph node relay whether pelvic or para-aortic. In our study, we chose the patent blue dye as a tracer. This tracer is widely used in oncologic surgery (for example in breast cancer) and approved but not in ovarian cancer yet. During surgery for early stage ovarian cancer, we will inject the patent blue dye on both side of the ovarian tumor. Then, we will check for first colorful lymph node, in both pelvic and para-aortic regions. We will send these dissected lymph node to pathology for analysis. Finally, we will continue the procedure as the standard of care. Our objective is to compare the results between the sentinel lymph node and the complete lymphadenectomy and to study the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy using the blue patent dye as tracer.