Soo Jin Park

Real world effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer: a Korean multicenter retrospective cohort study

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin (CD) compared with those of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer in a real-world setting in Korea. We enrolled relevant patients from 9 institutions. All patients received CD or CP as the second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice during 2013-2018. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The secondary endpoint included the objective response rate (ORR). Overall, 432 patients (224 and 208 in the CD and CP groups, respectively) were included. With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median PFS was not different between the groups (12.7 vs. 13.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-1.460; p=0.202). The ORR was 74.6% and 80.1% in the CD and CP group, respectively (p=0.556). Age and surgery at relapse were independent prognostic factors. More patients in the CD group significantly experienced a grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and hand-foot syndrome (13.8% vs. 6.3%), whereas grade 2 or more alopecia (6.2% vs. 36.1%), peripheral neuropathy (4.4% vs. 11.4%), and allergic/hypersensitivity reaction (0.4% vs. 8.5%) developed more often in the CP group. The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with CD in a real-world setting were consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The different toxicity profiles between the 2 chemotherapy (CD and CP) regimens should be considered in the clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03562533.

Current peritonectomy practice during debulking surgery in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 4004)

Because of the possible therapeutic benefit of removing occult tumor cells, a source of recurrence and chemoresistance, total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) is an alternative treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer. Interventional studies comparing TPP with selective parietal peritonectomy (SPP) are in progress. Since surgeons skilled in TPP are essential for such trials to be conducted, this nationwide survey aimed to examine current peritonectomy practice among gynecologic oncologists in Korea. A 17-item questionnaire, developed by a surgery committee and reviewed by the scientific review board of the Korean Gynecology Oncology Group (KGOG), was distributed to 144 KGOG members. The questionnaire was divided into 3 categories: respondent demographics, peritonectomy practice during primary debulking surgery (PDS), and peritonectomy practice during interval debulking surgery (IDS). We received 88 (61.1%) valid responses. Of the valid respondents, 98.9% and 93.8% performed SPP during PDS and IDS, respectively. Only 4.9% of the respondents performed TPP during IDS. Most respondents performed peritonectomy in cases where optimal postoperative outcomes were expected. Approximately 50.6% of the respondents had performed peritonectomy independently, while the others did so in cooperation with non-gynecologic surgeons. The primary reasons for not performing TPP were concerns about morbidity and uncertainty about the clinical benefits of the procedure. SPP is the predominant technique used in both PDS and IDS in Korea. A small percentage (4.9%) of gynecologic oncologists have performed TPP during IDS. Accordingly, a study regarding the feasibility of TPP should be conducted before proceeding with a prospective clinical trial.

Lymphadenectomy in clinically early epithelial ovarian cancer and survival analysis (LILAC): a Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration (GORILLA-3002) retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy in patients surgically treated for clinically early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This retrospective, multicenter study included patients with clinically early-stage EOC based on preoperative abdominal-pelvic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings between 2007 and 2021. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative complications were compared between the lymphadenectomy and non-lymphadenectomy groups. Independent prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes were the secondary outcomes. In total, 586 patients (lymphadenectomy group, n=453 [77.3%]; non-lymphadenectomy groups, n=133 [22.7%]) were eligible. After surgical staging, upstaging was identified based on the presence of lymph node metastasis in 14 (3.1%) of 453 patients. No significant difference was found in the 5-year DFS (88.9% vs. 83.4%, p=0.203) and 5-year OS (97.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.895) between the two groups. Using multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy was not significantly associated with DFS or OS. However, using subgroup analysis, the lymphadenectomy group with serous histology had higher 5-year DFS rates than did the non-lymphadenectomy group (86.5% vs. 74.4%, p=0.048; adjusted hazard ratio=0.281; 95% confidence interval=0.107-0.735; p=0.010). The lymphadenectomy group had longer operating time (p<0.001), higher estimated blood loss (p<0.001), and higher perioperative complication rate (p=0.004) than did the non-lymphadenectomy group. In patients with clinically early-stage EOC with serous histology, lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefits. Considering its potential harm, lymphadenectomy should be performed according to histologic subtype and subsequent chemotherapy in patients with clinically early-stage EOC. Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0007309.

Risk factors for the failure of first‐line PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators Collaboration Study (GORILLA‐3004)

AbstractObjectiveTo identify the risk factors for failure of first‐line poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.MethodPatients with stage III‐IV epithelial ovarian cancer who received first‐line PARPi maintenance therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic factors were compared between two groups—recur/progression of disease (PD) and non‐recur/PD.ResultsIn total, 191 patients were included. Median follow‐up was 9.9 months, and recurrence rate was 20.9%. BRCA mutations were found in 63.4% patients. Postoperative residual tumor (60.5% vs. 37.8%), non‐high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) (15.0% vs. 6.0%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (55.0% vs. 35.8%), and pre‐PARPi serum CA‐125 levels ≥23.5 U/mL (35.9% vs. 15.2%) were more frequently observed in the recur/PD group. Multivariate Cox‐regression analysis revealed pre‐PARPi serum CA‐125 levels ≥23.5 U/mL (HR, 2.17; 95%CI, 1.03–4.57; p = 0.042), non‐HGSC (3.28; 1.20–8.97; p = 0.021), NAC (2.11; 1.04–4.26; p = 0.037), and no BRCA mutation (2.23; 1.12–4.44; p = 0.023) as independent risk factors associated with poor progression‐free survival (PFS). A subgroup analysis according to BRCA mutation status showed that pre‐PARPi serum CA‐125 levels ≥26.4 U/mL were the only independent risk factor for poor PFS in women with BRCA mutations (2.75; 1.03–7.39; p = 0.044). Non‐HGSC (5.05; 1.80–14.18; p = 0.002) and NAC (3.36; 1.25–9.04; p = 0.016) were independent risk factors in women without BRCA mutations.ConclusionHigh pre‐PARPi serum CA‐125 levels, non‐HGSC histology, NAC, and no BRCA mutation might be risk factors for early failure of first‐line PARPi maintenance therapy. In women with BRCA mutations, high pre‐PARPi serum CA‐125 levels, which represent a large tumor burden before PARPi, were the only independent risk factor for poor PFS.

Optimum selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study from the Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLaborAtion group (GORILLA‐3001)

AbstractBackgroundTo identify those most likely to benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS), we evaluated the survival outcomes and factors predictive of prognosis in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated at five high‐volume Korean hospitals between 2010 and 2021. Recurrence characteristics, treatment methods, and potential predictors of survival were compared between the chemotherapy and surgery groups.ResultsAmong all 670 patients, 88.1% had initial stage III/IV disease, and 215 (32.1%) underwent SCS. Among patients who underwent SCS, only those who achieved complete resection exhibited improved survival. Even in patients with residual disease &lt; 1 cm after SCS, we observed no significant survival benefit (p = 0.942). In the multivariate Cox analysis, residual disease at primary surgery, progression‐free interval, recurrence sites (≤3 regions or limited carcinomatosis), ascites, and SCS were significant predictors of survival. Meanwhile, the only factor predictive of complete resection after SCS was recurrence sites (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsThe benefits of SCS appear to be exclusive to cases of complete resection. We propose limited regional platinum‐sensitive recurrence (≤3 regions or limited carcinomatosis) without ascites as the optimum selection criteria for SCS.

Asian perspective on debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: An E-survey

We performed an E-survey to evaluate the practice patterns in debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in Asia. We designed a questionnaire, including 50 questions related to debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. The questionnaire was sent to Gynecologic Oncologic Groups in Asia from December 2016 to February 2017. A total of 253 gynecologic oncologists from Japan (58.9%), the Republic of Korea (19%), Taiwan (12.6%), and the other counties including China (7.5%), Malaysia (0.8%), Indonesia (0.8%), and Thailand (0.4%) participated in this E-survey. The median number of debulking surgeries per year was 20, and 46.8% of the respondents preferred <1 cm as the criterion for optimal debulking surgery (ODS). The most common barrier and surgical finding precluding ODS were performance status (74.3%) and disease involving the porta hepatis (71.5%). Moreover, 63.2% had a fellowship program, and only 15% or less had opportunities to receive additional training courses in general, thoracic, or urologic surgery. The median percentage of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was 30%, and the achieved rate of ODS in primary debulking surgery (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) was 65% and 80%, respectively. Most of the respondents required three to 6 h for PDS (48.6%) and IDS (58.9%). Moreover, more than 50% depended on ultra-radical surgery conducted by specialists. The ODS criteria are relatively lenient with a preference for NAC in 30% of the respondents in Asia. This trend might be associated with the dependence on aggressive surgery performed by specialists.

Is increased chronological age a contraindication to debulking surgery for elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer?

We collected data of elderly patients aged 65 years and older who underwent debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in order to explore the impact of old age on surgical outcomes and complications. A total of 120 patients were classified as follows: group 1, 65-69 years (

Real-World Effectiveness of PLD in Platinum- Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This retrospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with carboplatin (CD) compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in patients who had disease progression longer than 6 months after first-line platinum+taxane chemotherapy for ovarian cancer in real world clinical practice.