Investigator

Siqing Fu

Professor · The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Investigational Cancer Therapeutics

About

SFSiqing Fu
Papers(3)
Phase I study of beva…Phase 1/2 trial of av…Multicenter Phase II …
Collaborators(10)
Funda Meric-BernstamApostolia TsimberidouYuan YuanAnne KniselyAnthony D. EliasAung NaingBettzy StephenDaniel D. KarpEcaterina E. DumbravaJordi Rodon Ahnert
Institutions(3)
The University Of Tex…University Of Iowa Ho…University Of Colorad…

Papers

Phase I study of bevacizumab and temsirolimus combination therapy in advanced malignancies: safety, efficacy, and ovarian cancer expansion

Abstract Background Bevacizumab and temsirolimus target angiogenic and mTOR pathways in cancer progression. Methods This phase I study enrolled 48 heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, including an ovarian cancer expansion cohort. Patients received bevacizumab biweekly plus temsirolimus weekly in a 3 + 3 design to assess safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Exploratory analyses included tumor genomic profiling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Results Patients had a median age of 59 and median four prior therapies. Common tumor types were ovarian (27%) and head and neck (15%). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 93.8%, with 31.3% ≥grade 3. Five patients experienced DLTs, including grade 3 enteritis, fatigue, bowel obstruction/abdominal ileus/pulmonary embolism, bowel perforation and grade 3/4 elevated liver enzymes. MTD was bevacizumab 10 mg/kg biweekly plus temsirolimus 20 mg weekly. Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 7.3% and 19.5% achieved stable disease ≥6 months (clinical benefit rate [CBR] 26.8%). In ovarian cohort, ORR was 16.7% and CBR 33.3%. Patients with tumor regression on DCE-MRI had lower ΔKtrans values. Conclusion Combination therapy showed acceptable safety and modest activity. Molecular and imaging findings were exploratory and limited. These preliminary observations could inform future biomarker studies. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552434)

Phase 1/2 trial of avelumab combined with utomilumab (4‐1BB agonist), PF‐04518600 (OX40 agonist), or radiotherapy in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint blockade has shown mixed results in advanced/recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Efficacy may be improved through costimulation with OX40 and 4‐1BB agonists. The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of avelumab combined with utomilumab (a 4‐1BB agonist), PF‐04518600 (an OX40 agonist), and radiotherapy in patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies.MethodsThe primary end point in this six‐arm, phase 1/2 trial was safety of the combination regimens. Secondary end points included the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and immune‐related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, the disease control rate (DCR), the duration of response, progression‐free survival, and overall survival.ResultsForty patients were included (35% with cervical cancer, 30% with endometrial cancer, and 35% with ovarian cancer). Most patients (n = 33; 83%) were enrolled in arms A–C (no radiation). Among 35 patients who were evaluable for efficacy, the ORR was 2.9%, and the DCR was 37.1%, with a median duration of stable disease of 5.4 months (interquartile range, 4.1–7.3 months). Patients with cervical cancer in arm A (avelumab and utomilumab; n = 9 evaluable patients) achieved an ORR of 11% and a DCR of 78%. The median progression‐free survival was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8–3.5 months), and overall survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 5.6–11.9 months). No dose‐limiting toxicities or grade 3–5 immune‐related adverse events were observed.ConclusionsThe findings from this trial highlight that, in heavily pretreated patients with gynecologic cancer, even multidrug regimens targeting multiple immunologic pathways, although safe, did not produce significant responses. A DCR of 78% in patients with cervical cancer who received avelumab and utomilumab indicates that further research on this combination in select patients may be warranted.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of the WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib in Refractory Solid Tumors Harboring CCNE1 Amplification

PURPOSE Preclinical cancer models harboring CCNE1 amplification were more sensitive to adavosertib treatment, a WEE1 kinase inhibitor, than models without amplification. Thus, we conducted this phase II study to assess the antitumor activity of adavosertib in patients with CCNE1-amplified, advanced refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥ 18 years with measurable disease and refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function were studied. Patients received 300 mg of adavosertib once daily on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 of a 21-day cycle. The trial followed Bayesian optimal phase II design. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Thirty patients were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 9.9 months. Eight patients had partial responses (PRs), and three had stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months, with an ORR of 27% (95% CI, 12 to 46), a SD ≥ 6 months/PR rate of 37% (95% CI, 20 to 56), a median progression-free survival duration of 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 6.4), and a median overall survival duration of 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 15). Fourteen patients with epithelial ovarian cancer showed an ORR of 36% (95% CI, 13 to 65) and SD ≥ 6 months/PR of 57% (95% CI, 29 to 82), a median progression-free survival duration of 6.3 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 10.2), and a median overall survival duration of 14.9 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 20.9). Common treatment-related toxicities were GI, hematologic toxicities, and fatigue. CONCLUSION Adavosertib monotherapy demonstrates a manageable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity in refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification, especially in epithelial ovarian cancer. Further study of adavosertib, alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents, in CCNE1-amplified epithelial ovarian cancer is warranted.

255Works
3Papers
18Collaborators
NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungNasopharyngeal CarcinomaCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney Neoplasms

Positions

2018–

Professor

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Investigational Cancer Therapeutics

2012–

Associate Professor

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics

2009–

Assistant Professor

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics

Education

2001

Residency

University of Rochester Medial Center · Primare Care Program

1999

Internship

Yale-New Haven Hospital Saint Raphael Campus · Internal Medicine

1996

Ph.D.

University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston · Molecular Biology

1985

Medical Degree

Tonji Medical University

Country

US

Keywords
Early Drug DevelopmentPhase I Clinical Trials