Silvia Migliaccio

Ovarian Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Challenges and Future Perspectives

Background: Ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (O-NENs) are extremely rare, representing less than 1% of all ovarian neoplasms and under 5% of all neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). They encompass two primary histological subtypes: well-differentiated carcinoids and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, which display distinct biological behaviors and prognoses. The ovary can also be a site of metastasis from extra-ovarian NETs. Owing to their rarity, clinical management lacks standardization, and diagnosis is often incidental following surgery for presumed epithelial ovarian neoplasms. Objectives: This review aims to provide an updated synthesis of current evidence on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and prognosis of O-NENs, highlighting unmet clinical needs. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed for the years 2014–2024 using the keywords: “ovarian neuroendocrine tumor”, “ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasm”, “ovarian neuroendocrine carcinoma”, and “ovarian carcinoid”. Only articles published in English were considered. Given the rarity of the disease, in addition to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, relevant case reports and case series were also included to provide a comprehensive clinical picture, yielding 32 eligible articles. Results: Evidence indicates that O-NENs remain understudied, with most data derived from case reports and small series. Clinical presentations vary from asymptomatic masses to hormone-related syndromes, often mimicking other ovarian pathologies. Diagnostic work-up typically follows the same protocol as epithelial ovarian cancer, with the neuroendocrine nature only recognized postoperatively. Treatment strategies are empirical and largely extrapolated from extra-ovarian NETs due to the absence of specific guidelines. Prognosis varies widely depending on histotype, stage, and secretory activity. Conclusions: O-NENs pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their rarity and heterogeneity. Greater clinical awareness, multidisciplinary management, and multicenter research are essential to establish evidence-based protocols and improve patient outcomes.

Lifestyle and environmental factors in women carrying BRCA pathogenic variants with and without cancer

Abstract Background In the development of breast cancer and ovarian cancer there may be an influence of lifestyle and environmental factors. This influence could be relevant also in patients with genetic predisposition such as in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes. However, this issue has been addressed in only a few studies so far. Methods In this retrospective, multicenter case-control study, we enrolled participants with a pathogenic variant BRCA gene and divided into 2 groups: group 1, patients with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer, and group 2, subjects without cancer. We compared these groups regarding demographic data as age, body mass index, smoking habits, estroprogestinic use, Mediterranean diet, and physical activity. Multivariable analyses were used to identify predisposing factors. All evaluations were 2-tailed and considered statistically significant if the P value was less than .05. Results We enrolled 281 participants, 135 (79.4%) with breast cancer, 32 (18.8%) with ovarian cancer, 3 (1.8%) with both, and 111 unaffected (39.5%) women. Independent risk factors associated with cancer were age (P < .0001); body mass index (P = .007); family history (P = .002); occupation (P = .003); smoking habits (P = .012), number of cigarettes smoked (P = .016), and pack-year index (P = .022); and estroprogestinic use (P = .032) and years of estroprogestinic use (P = .029). At multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.062; P < .0001), family history (OR = 0.129; P = .001), number of cigarettes smoked (P = .014), and estroprogestinic use (OR = 2.009; P = .025) were statistically significant risk factors associated with cancer development. Conclusions In the development of breast cancer and ovarian cancer, lifestyle and environmental factors seem to play a statistically significant role in the presence of genetic predisposition associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations.