Silvia Catot

Sentinel SENECA risk factors for unsuccessful bi-lateral sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer

Our study aims to assess the risk factors associated with bi-lateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping failure in endometrial cancer. The SENECA study was a retrospective multi-center international observational study that reviewed data from 2139 women with clinical stage I-to-II endometrial cancer across 64 centers in 17 countries. Between January 2021 and December 2022, patients underwent surgical treatment with SLN assessment, following the guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology. Risk factors associated with the absence of bi-lateral mapping were analyzed using χ Among the 2139 patients, the bi-lateral lymph node detection rate was 82.7%, whereas the unilateral detection rate was 97.3%. In multi-variate analysis, 5 risk factors remained statistically associated with unsuccessful bi-lateral lymph node mapping: high-grade histology (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.79, p=.03), myometrial invasion >50% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.75, p=.012), low-volume surgeon <20 cases/year (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.89, p<.01), open surgical approach (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.78 , p=.03), and non-indocyanine green tracer (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64 to 7.99, p<.01). The addition of bi-lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy to SLN biopsy caused an increased rate of intra-operative complications (2% vs 8.4%, p<.01) and all-grade post-operative complications (4.1% vs 11.2%, p<.01). Our study identifies 5 risk factors associated with unsuccessful lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer. Efforts should be made to perform this technique with indocyanine green, through minimally invasive surgery, and performed or supervised by an experienced surgeon with ≥20 endometrial cancer cases per year.

Addressing unmet needs in long-term survivors of ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov40/NOGGO S13/GEICO 71-R/Expression VI): insights from a Spanish cohort

Ovarian cancer remains a significant global health concern. Contemporary therapeutics have led to an increased number of long-term survivors. This research investigates the unmet needs of long-term ovarian cancer survivors in Spain, focusing on persistent side effects, patient concerns, lifestyle changes, and ongoing challenges. This is a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study, assessing the results from the international North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology survey, Expression VI - Long-term survival with ovarian cancer in Spain. Participants were identified during follow-up visits at oncology departments. A structured questionnaire of 68 items, including demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and lifestyle domains, was completed anonymously in printed format, with implied consent through survey completion. A total of 250 long-term ovarian cancer survivors from Spain, defined as patients diagnosed of malignant ovarian cancer with a survival ≥8 years since diagnosis (median age at diagnosis 52 years; median survival time 11 years), completed the survey. A substantial number of participants continued to experience long-term side effects, including gastrointestinal (90%), dermatologic (91.6%), and neurologic symptoms, such as memory problems (15.1%) and concentration difficulties (10.8%). Nearly half of the survivors (47.3%) expressed concerns about nervousness, 43.6% reported ongoing pain, and 40% struggled with sleep disturbances. Lifestyle changes after cancer diagnostic were significant, with 56.5% of smoker participants quitting or reducing smoking and 41.6% adopting healthier diets. Finally, our results indicate that most participants received some form of follow-up, primarily through blood biomarker monitoring (87.0%) and imaging tests (73.0%). This study highlights the persistent challenges among long-term ovarian cancer survivors in Spain, stressing the need for more comprehensive, tailored aftercare. These findings may be generalized to other regions, emphasizing the importance of addressing ongoing side effects and unmet care needs to improve survivors' long-term quality of life. Enhanced follow-up care, patient support, and effective communication are essential components of this effort.