Investigator

Signe Flottorp

Research director · Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Department of Evidence Synthesis

SFSigne Flottorp
Papers(1)
Global impacts of COV…
Collaborators(10)
Valborg BasteWilliam Chi‐Wai WongWilson D. PaceZheng Jye LingZhuo LiAdrian LaughlinAmy Pui Pui NgAngela OrtigozaCecilia Clara Da RozaChristine Mary Hallin…
Institutions(7)
Norwegian Institute O…NORCE Norwegian Resea…University of Hong Ko…DARTNet InstituteNational University O…The University of Mel…University of Toronto…

Papers

Global impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium

AbstractObjectiveTo understand how the COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted sexual and reproductive health (SRH) visits.DesignAn ecological study comparing SRH services volume in different countries before and after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic.SettingSeven countries from theINTernational ConsoRtium ofPrimary Care BIgData Researchers (INTRePID) across four continents.PopulationOver 3.8 million SRH visits to primary care physicians in Australia, China, Canada, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the USA.MethodsDifference in average SRH monthly visits before and during the pandemic, with negative binomial regression modelling to compare predicted and observed number of visits during the pandemic for SRH visits.Main outcome measuresMonthly number of visits to primary care physicians from 2018 to 2021.ResultsDuring the pandemic, the average volume of monthly SRH visits increased in Canada (15.6%, 99% CI 8.1–23.0%) where virtual care was pronounced. China, Singapore, Sweden and the USA experienced a decline (−56.5%, 99% CI −74.5 to −38.5%; −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%; −19.4%, 99% CI −28.3 to −10.6%; and −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%, respectively); while Australia and Norway showed insignificant changes (6.5%, 99% CI −0.7 to –13.8% and 1.7%, 99% CI −6.4 to –9.8%). The countries that maintained (Australia, Norway) or surpassed (Canada) pre‐pandemic visit rates had the greatest use of virtual care.ConclusionsIn‐person SRH visits to primary care decreased during the pandemic. Virtual care seemed to counterbalance that decline. Although cervical cancer screening appeared insensitive to virtual care, strategies such as incorporating self‐collected samples for HPV testing may provide a solution in a future pandemic.

77Works
1Papers
20Collaborators

Positions

2018–

Research director

Norwegian Institute of Public Health · Department of Evidence Synthesis

2013–

Researcher

University of Oslo, Institue of Health and Society · Department of General Practice

2004–

Senior researcher

Folkehelseinstituttet Formidling og bruk av kunnskap

Education

2003

PhD (Dr. med.)

University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine · Faculty of Medicine

1979

MD

University of Oslo · Faculty of Medicine

Country

NO