Investigator

Sarat Chandarlapaty

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

SCSarat Chandarlapa…
Papers(2)
Evolution and Co-occu…A Phase II Study of F…
Collaborators(10)
Britta WeigeltPier SelenicaThais BasiliTiffany Troso-SandovalTimothy J. HoangVania HomVicky MakkerWilliam A. ZammarrelliWilliam P. TewYingjie Zhu
Institutions(1)
Memorial Sloan Ketter…

Papers

Evolution and Co-occurrence of PI3K Pathway Gene Mutations in Endometrial Carcinoma Molecular Subtypes at the Single-Cell Level

Abstract Purpose: The PI3K pathway is altered in >85% of endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EEC), with multiple mutations commonly co-occurring. Yet, the therapeutic effects of single-agent PI3K pathway inhibitors have been limited. We used single-cell sequencing to determine whether co-occurring PTEN, PIK3CA, and/or PIK3R1 somatic mutations in EECs stratified by molecular subtype originated through convergent or linear evolution. Experimental Design: Banked frozen EECs with co-occurring PI3K pathway mutations of no specific molecular profile (NSMP; n = 5), mismatch repair–deficient (MMRd; n = 3), and POLE (n = 3) subtypes were selected for single-nucleus DNA sequencing targeting hotspot variants of 64 cancer-related genes and the PTEN, PIK3R1, and PIK3CA coding sequences. EEC cell lines and nonmalignant samples were used to define error rates and filter false-positive calls. Results: Single-nucleus analyses (n = 50,009 cells) revealed that in NSMP EECs, the co-occurring PIK3CA, PIK3R1, and/or PTEN mutations affected nearly all cells through linear evolution. MMRd EECs displayed higher levels of genetic heterogeneity, harboring PI3K pathway gene mutations in subsets of cells ranging from 3.9% to 96%. POLE EECs had the highest level of clonal diversity and harbored multiple, minor subclonal structures in all cases, through convergent evolution. We found a clear distinction between nearly clonal PI3K pathway gene alterations (>95%) and multiple, minor mutually exclusive subclones only affecting 1.4% to 27% of the tumor cells sequenced. Conclusions: Our exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis suggests that PI3K pathway alterations evolve distinctly in MMRd/POLE compared with NSMP EECs, which may have therapeutic consequences. Further studies on the signaling output and PI3K pathway inhibitor response in EECs with subclonal PI3K pathway alterations are warranted.

A Phase II Study of Fulvestrant plus Abemaciclib in Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Purpose: Inhibition of the cyclin D–cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6–INK4–retinoblastoma pathway can overcome acquired or de novo treatment resistance to endocrine monotherapy. Responses to endocrine monotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer are suboptimal, perhaps due to genomic alterations that promote estrogen receptor–independent cyclin D1–CDK4/6 activation. We hypothesized that the addition of abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 kinase inhibitor, to antiestrogen therapy with fulvestrant would be an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods: In this phase II study, patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer received 150 mg of abemaciclib orally twice daily with 500 mg of fulvestrant intramuscularly monthly with a 2-week loading dose. Eligibility included estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor expression ≥1% by IHC, measurable disease, ≤2 prior lines of chemotherapy, and ≤1 prior lines of hormonal therapy. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Results: Twenty-seven patients initiated therapy, and 25 were evaluable for efficacy. Eleven patients achieved partial response; 10 responses (91%) were in copy number–low/no specific molecular profile tumors, 1 response (9%) was in a microsatellite instability–high tumor, and no responses were observed in copy number–high/TP53abnormal tumors. The objective response rate was 44% (90% confidence interval, 27.0%–62.1%). The median duration of response was 15.6 months. The median progression-free survival was 9.0 months (90% confidence interval, 1.8–20.4). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (26%) and anemia (19%); no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: The combination of abemaciclib and fulvestrant has promising activity with durable responses in advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer; a randomized trial is planned. See related commentary by Garg and Oza, p. 2073

2Papers
34Collaborators