Sara M Tolaney

Phase I study of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) with spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) with and without fulvestrant in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer or advanced ovarian cancer

Background Preclinical evidence suggests that cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors enhance antitumor immunity. We conducted a phase I trial of ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) plus spartalizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) or advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). The combination was also evaluated with fulvestrant in MBC. Methods In Cohort A, ribociclib was administered on Days 1–21 (28-day cycle) starting at 400 mg, and spartalizumab at 400 mg on Day 1. Dose escalation was followed by expansion in AOC. Fulvestrant was added (Cohort B) with a safety run-in followed by expansion in MBC. Primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and safety and tolerability of the combinations. Results 33 patients enrolled (n=18, Cohort A; n=15, Cohort B). The RP2D of ribociclib in both cohorts was 600 mg. Treatment-related adverse events in >20% of patients in either cohort were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypertransaminasemia, maculopapular rash, fatigue, and nausea. Hypertransaminasemia occurred in 66.7% (AST) and 46.7% (ALT) of patients in Cohort B, including 46.7% and 40.0%, respectively, of grade 3 or 4 events. Two confirmed partial responses were observed (13.3%) in Cohort B, in patients with low baseline serum thymidine kinase activity, coupled with an increase on-treatment. Peripheral blood flow cytometry across patients demonstrated on-target drug binding with increases in PD-1 occupancy and activated CD8+ T cells during treatment, irrespective of response. PD-L1-positivity, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, or tumor mutational burden did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). Several copy-number variations detected with next-generation sequencing correlated with PFS. Conclusions Ribociclib with spartalizumab and fulvestrant showed limited efficacy and elevated hepatotoxicity, precluding further development. Correlative analyses revealed treatment-induced immunological effects, and genomic alterations associated with PFS.

Endometrial Cancer Risk Among Germline BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: Review of Our Current Understanding and Next Steps

PURPOSE To review the literature exploring endometrial cancer (EC) risk among surgical candidates with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) to guide decisions around risk-reducing (rr) hysterectomy in this population. DESIGN A comprehensive review was conducted of the current literature that influences clinical practice and informs expert consensus. We present our understanding of EC risk among BRCA1/2 PV carriers, the risk-modifying factors specific to this patient population, and the available research technology that may guide clinical practice in the future. Limitations of the existing literature are outlined. RESULTS Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs, those with a personal history of tamoxifen use, those who desire long-term hormone replacement therapy, and/or have an elevated BMI are at higher risk of EC, primarily endometrioid EC and/or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, and may benefit from rr-hysterectomy. Although prescriptive clinical guidelines specific to BRCA1/2 PV carriers could inform decisions around rr-hysterectomy, limitations of the current literature prevent more definitive guidance at this time. A large population-based study of a contemporary cohort of BRCA1/2 PV carriers with lifetime follow-up compared with cancer-gene negative controls would advance this topic and facilitate care decisions. CONCLUSION This review validates a potential role for rr-hysterectomy to address EC risk among surgical candidates with BRCA1/2 PVs. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for rr-hysterectomy in BRCA1/2 PV carriers are essential to ensure equitable access to this preventive measure, supporting insurance coverage for patients with either BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs to pursue rr-hysterectomy. Overall, this review highlights the complexity of EC risk in BRCA1/2 PV carriers and offers a comprehensive framework to shared decision making to inform rr-hysterectomy for BRCA1/2 PV carriers.