Investigator

Sandip P Patel

Associate Professor · UCSD Moores Cancer Center, Medical Oncology

SPPSandip P Patel
Papers(3)
Phase 1/2 study of mo…A Phase II Basket Tri…SWOG/NCI Phase II Dua…
Institutions(1)
University Of Califor…

Papers

Phase 1/2 study of monalizumab plus durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background The combination of monalizumab (anti-NKG2A/CD94) and durvalumab (anti-programmed death ligand-1) may promote antitumor immunity by targeting innate and adaptive immunity. This phase 1/2 study of monalizumab and durvalumab evaluated safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamics in patients with advanced solid tumors. Main body Immunotherapy-naïve patients aged ≥18 years with advanced disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and 1–3 prior lines of systemic therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting were enrolled. In part 1 (dose escalation), patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with increasing doses of monalizumab Q2W/Q4W (n=15). Dose expansion in part 1 included patients with cervical cancer (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS)-colorectal cancer (CRC) (n=15; durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q4W). In part 2 (dose expansion), patients with MSS-CRC (n=40), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=20), MSS-endometrial cancer (n=40), or ovarian cancer (n=40) received durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W and monalizumab 750 mg Q2W. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Exploratory analyses included assessment of T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell activation and proliferation in peripheral blood and the tumor microenvironment (TME). The study enrolled 185 patients (part 1, 45; part 2, 140). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. In part 2, the most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (12.1%), asthenia (9.3%), diarrhea (9.3%), pruritus (7.9%), and pyrexia (7.1%). In the expansion cohorts, response rates were 0% (cervical), 7.7% (MSS-CRC), 10% (NSCLC), 5.4% (ovarian), and 0% (MSS-endometrial). Sustained NK cell activation, CD8+ T-cell proliferation, increased serum levels of CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10) and CXCL11, and increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ and granzyme B+ cells were observed. Conclusions Although efficacy was modest, monalizumab plus durvalumab was well tolerated and encouraging immune activation was observed in the peripheral blood and TME. Trial registration number NCT02671435.

A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti–CTLA-4 and Anti–PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors SWOG S1609: Vulvar Cancers

Abstract Purpose: Dual PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition shows promise in various malignancies. The SWOG S1609 Dual Anti–CTLA-4 and Anti–PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial presents initial results of ipilimumab/nivolumab in vulvar cancers. Patients and Methods: DART is a prospective/open-label/multicenter (1,016 US sites)/multicohort phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective response rate [ORR; confirmed complete response and partial response (PR)] per RECISTv1.1, whereas progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, clinical benefit rate (CBR; ORR plus stable disease ≥6 months), and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Results: Sixteen evaluable patients (median age, 55.5 years; 0–6 prior therapies; no prior immunotherapy) were analyzed, all of whom had squamous cell carcinoma histology. The ORR was 18.8% (3/16), CBR was 25% (4/16), and CBR plus unconfirmed PR rate was 31% (5/16); the PFS was 34.1, 16.7. 15.5, 7.2, and 7.0 months for these five patients, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival were 2.2 and 7.6 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, pruritus, anorexia, and nausea (25%, n = 4 each). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 25% of patients (n = 4). There was one grade 1 to 2 adverse event (6.7%) that led to discontinuation and one (6.7%) grade 5 death adverse event. Conclusions: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab in vulvar cancers resulted in an objective response in 3 of 16 patients, all of whom had durable responses lasting over 1 year. Notably, two additional patients experienced durable stable disease and unconfirmed PR. Correlative studies to determine response and resistance markers are ongoing.

SWOG/NCI Phase II Dual Anti–CTLA-4/PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors: Nonepithelial Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Purpose: The role of dual checkpoint inhibition (ipilimumab at 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks and nivolumab at 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) in advanced rare/ultrarare nonepithelial ovarian cancers is yet to be explored. Patients and Methods: Dual anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1 blockade in rare tumor is a prospective, multicenter (1,016 US sites), multicohort, single-arm phase II trial conducted through the Early Therapeutics and Rare Cancer SWOG/NCI Committee, assessing ipilimumab (anti–CTLA-4; 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks) and nivolumab (anti–PD-1; 240 mg every 2 weeks) in adults with advanced nonepithelial ovarian cancers who lack beneficial standard therapy. The primary outcome was overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR)/partial response (PR)]; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, clinical benefit rate [stable disease (SD) ≥6 months plus ORR], and toxicity. Results: Seventeen patients (median age: 64; number of prior therapies ranged from 0 to 8 with no immunotherapy exposure; eight granulosa, six carcinosarcomas, one Sertoli–Leydig, one yolk sac, and one Wolffian) were evaluated. In granulosa cell tumors, ORR was 25% (n = 2/8; one CR and one PR) and clinical benefit rate was 50% (n = 4/8); PFS was 58.3 (CR), 50.7+ (PR), 30.4 (SD), and 8.7 (SD) months. Median PFS was 3.5 months [95% confidence interval, 1.7–11.2 months]; median overall survival was 42.5 months (95% confidence interval, 10.1 months–not reached). One Sertoli–Leydig cell tumor showed a 22% regression (PFS, 11.2 months). Carcinosarcomas had no response. Three participants (18%) discontinued treatment due to grade 3 to grade 4 adverse events. Conclusions: Ipilimumab–nivolumab shows activity in treatment-refractory granulosa cell tumors, with 25% (n = 2/8) of patients experiencing either CR or PR lasting more than 4 years.

3Papers

Positions

2014–

Associate Professor

UCSD Moores Cancer Center · Medical Oncology