Investigator

Sakari Hietanen

Chief of Dept. · Turku University Hospital, Dept. of Obst. & Gyn./Gyn Oncology

SHSakari Hietanen
Papers(8)
Dynamic and Ongoing …Decoding the Genomic …Molecular subtype dia…Deciphering cancer ge…Efficacy and safety o…A longitudinal analys…Beyond HRD Status: Un…Real-life treatment p…
Collaborators(10)
Johanna HynninenJaana OikkonenGiovanni MarchiTaru A. MuranenSampsa HautaniemiGiulia MicoliKaisa HuhtinenYilin LiKari LavikkaAnni Virtanen
Institutions(3)
University Of TurkuUniversity of HelsinkiUniversity of Helsinki

Papers

Dynamic and Ongoing De Novo L1 Retrotransposition Contributes to Genome Plasticity and Intrapatient Heterogeneity in Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Long interspersed element-1 (L1) retrotransposons are the only protein-coding active transposable elements in the human genome. Although typically silenced in normal cells, they are highly expressed in many human epithelial cancers, including high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), and can integrate into the genome through retrotransposition. De novo L1 insertions are known to contribute to genomic instability and cancer evolution in epithelial malignancies, including HGSC, suggesting that they might also play a role in intrapatient tumor heterogeneity. In this study, we quantified de novo L1 insertions in clinical HGSC specimens and uncovered high heterogeneity in total L1 insertion events (L1 burden) between patients. HGSC tumors with high L1 burden were highly proliferative, whereas tumors with low or no L1 insertions showed enrichment of immune response and cell death pathways. Although the overall L1 burden was similar across different tumor sites within the same patient, the specific L1 insertions (L1 profiles) diverged significantly more than their single-nucleotide variants profiles. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that L1 activity and retrotransposition are highly dynamic in vivo and can contribute substantially to tumor genome plasticity, especially at late stages of cancer progression. The patient-specific propensity of acquiring L1 insertions (L1 burden) could be driven by molecular properties of the progenitor tumor. Retrotransposition-associated DNA damage and/or replication stress could be a potential molecular vulnerability for precision cancer medicine approaches. Significance: L1 retrotransposition is a dynamic process that continues at late stages of high-grade serous ovarian cancer and can substantially contribute to intrapatient tumor heterogeneity.

Decoding the Genomic and Functional Landscape of Emerging Subtypes in Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is characterized by pervasive genomic instability and high inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Approximately half of HGSC tumors harbor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), rendering them vulnerable to PARP inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. In contrast, patients lacking HRD (HR-proficient, HRP) generally respond poorly to current therapies. To overcome heterogeneity and identify relevant HGSC subtypes, we characterized the genomic landscape of 640 tumors from 243 patients using whole-genome sequencing. Our chromosomal instability signature–based analysis characterized the structural variation landscape and revealed five HGSC subtypes, validated in an independent dataset. Two HRD subtypes, associated with BRCA1- or BRCA2-driven alterations, demonstrated favorable treatment responses. Strikingly, three HRP subtypes emerged, marked by unique structural alterations and gene expression patterns, tumor microenvironment interactions, and different chemotherapy responses. Notably, organoid experiments showed subtype-specific sensitivity to CHK1 inhibition, suggesting prexasertib as a potential targeted treatment for most currently untreatable HRP patients. Significance: These findings demonstrate that HGSC tumors can be divided into functionally and clinically distinct subtypes, offering new insights into the underlying biology of HGSC and providing a foundation to develop tailored therapeutic strategies for HRP tumors, which currently lack effective options.

Molecular subtype diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: comparison of the next-generation sequencing panel and Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer classifier

The Cancer Genome Atlas-based molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) has the potential to better identify those patients whose disease is likely to behave differently than predicted when using traditional risk stratification; however, the optimal approach to molecular subtype assignment in routine practice remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two different widely available approaches to diagnosis the EC molecular subtype. EC specimens from 60 patients were molecularly subclassified using two different methods, by using the FoundationOne CDx next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel and using the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) classifier and performing immunostaining for mismatch repair proteins and p53. POLE mutation status was derived from FoundationOne results in both settings. Molecular classification based on ProMisE was successful for all 60 tumors. Microsatellite instability status could be determined based on the NGS panel results in 53 of 60 tumors, so ProMisE and NGS molecular subtype assignment could be directly compared for these 53 tumors. Molecular subtype diagnosis based on NGS and ProMisE was in agreement for 52 of 53 tumors. One tumor was microsatellite stable but showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression. Molecular subtype diagnosis of EC based on the NGS panel of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded ECs and based primarily on immunostaining (ProMisE) yields identical results in 98.1% (52/53, kappa = 0.97) of cases. Although results obtained using these two approaches are comparable, each has advantages and disadvantages that will influence the choice of the method to be used in clinical practice.

Deciphering cancer genomes with GenomeSpy: a grammar-based visualization toolkit

Abstract Background Visualization is an indispensable facet of genomic data analysis. Despite the abundance of specialized visualization tools, there remains a distinct need for tailored solutions. However, their implementation typically requires extensive programming expertise from bioinformaticians and software developers, especially when building interactive applications. Toolkits based on visualization grammars offer a more accessible, declarative way to author new visualizations. Yet, current grammar-based solutions fall short in adequately supporting the interactive analysis of large datasets with extensive sample collections, a pivotal task often encountered in cancer research. Findings We present GenomeSpy, a grammar-based toolkit for authoring tailored, interactive visualizations for genomic data analysis. By using combinatorial building blocks and a declarative language, users can implement new visualization designs easily and embed them in web pages or end-user–oriented applications. A distinctive element of GenomeSpy’s architecture is its effective use of the graphics processing unit in all rendering, enabling a high frame rate and smoothly animated interactions, such as navigation within a genome. We demonstrate the utility of GenomeSpy by characterizing the genomic landscape of 753 ovarian cancer samples from patients in the DECIDER clinical trial. Our results expand the understanding of the genomic architecture in ovarian cancer, particularly the diversity of chromosomal instability. Conclusions GenomeSpy is a visualization toolkit applicable to a wide range of tasks pertinent to genome analysis. It offers high flexibility and exceptional performance in interactive analysis. The toolkit is open source with an MIT license, implemented in JavaScript, and available at https://genomespy.app/.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients aged ≥65 years from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

The phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients in PAOLA-1. Baseline clinical and molecular data, and PFS, were compared between older (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Factors associated with olaparib efficacy, and safety in age subgroups, were also assessed. Of 806 randomised patients, 292 (36.2%) were ≥65 years. A lower proportion of older versus younger patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (61.0% versus 76.2%) and upfront surgery (42.0% versus 55.7%). Older patients were less likely to have a BRCA1/2 mutation (17.1% versus 36.7%) or homologous recombination deficiency-positive status (34.1% versus 55.7%). After median follow-up of 22.1 months, median PFS was 21.6 months with olaparib versus 16.6 months with placebo in the older population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.75), comparable with the younger population (median 22.9 versus 16.9 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). PFS benefits were observed in patients with a BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumours. Incidence of olaparib-related grade ≥3 adverse events in older patients was comparable with that of younger patients (36.8% versus 31.7%) although hypertension and anaemia were more common in older patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in older patients receiving olaparib. Older patients enrolled in PAOLA-1 achieved similar PFS benefits compared with younger patients, with a similar safety profile.

A longitudinal analysis of CA125 glycoforms in the monitoring and follow up of high grade serous ovarian cancer

Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) is generally considered the gold standard of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC). We recently reported, that two CA125 glycoforms (CA125-STn and CA125-MGL) have a high specificity to HGSC and further hypothesized, that these cancer specific glycoforms are feasible candidates as biomarkers in HGSC treatment and follow up. Our cohort consisted of 122 patients diagnosed with HGSC. Serum samples were collected longitudinally at the time of diagnosis, during treatment and follow up. Serum levels of CA125, CA125-STn and CA125-MGL were determined and compared or correlated with different end points (tumor load assessed intraoperatively, residual disease, treatment response, progression free survival). Serum CA125-STn levels at diagnosis differentiated patients with low tumor load and high tumor load (p = 0,030), indicating a favorable detection of tumor volume. Similarly, the CA125-STn levels at diagnosis were significantly lower in patients with subsequent complete cytoreduction than in patients with suboptimal cytoreduction (p = 0,025). Conventional CA125 did not differentiate these patients (p = 0,363 and p = 0,154). The CA125-STn nadir value predicted the progression free survival of patients. The detection of disease relapse was improved with CA125-STn, which presented higher fold increase in 80,0% of patients and earlier increase in 37,0% of patients. CA125-STn showed promise as a useful biomarker in the monitoring and follow up of patients with HGSC utilizing a robust and affordable technique. Our findings are topical as a suitable indicator of tumor load facilitates patient selection in an era of new targeted therapies.

Beyond HRD Status: Unraveling Genetic Variants Impacting PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Abstract The management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC) has undergone significant advancements with the emergence of molecular diagnostics, particularly in predicting responses to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) based on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. However, understanding sensitivity and resistance beyond HRD status remains elusive. This study aims to explore molecular factors that may elucidate why HRD status does not consistently predict PARPi sensitivity. Therefore, we conducted a post hoc translational analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA part 1 and 2 trial (NCT02354131), focusing on alterations pertaining radiologic response and progression-free survival (PFS). DNA sequencing was performed using the TruSight Oncology 500 HT gene panel, with variants classified according to recent guidelines. HRD status had been assessed by Myriad MyChoice CDx. We identified, among 92 patients in the ENGOT-ov24/NSGO-AVANOVA part 1 and 2 trial, 151 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants across 81 samples. PARPi-sensitizing variants were found in two out of 10 HRD-negative samples from patients with clinical benefit (PFS ≥12 months), whereas three out of 10 HRD-positive samples from patients having no benefit (PFS ≤6 months) harbored variants associated with PARPi resistance. Additionally, analysis of BRCA1 variants revealed that truncating variants in exon 11 correlated with clinical benefit when niraparib was combined with bevacizumab. Conclusively, our findings highlight the complexity of PARPi response in AOC and underscore the importance of exploring somatic variants beyond HRD status. Further investigation into exon 11 variants of BRCA1 and the potential of combination treatment is warranted. Significance: The irregular response to PARPi in HRD-positive and -negative tumors highlights the need for identifying additional biomarkers. This study explores the mutational landscape beyond HRD status in AOC, ultimately advancing precision oncology in future clinical practice.

Real-life treatment patterns and time to next treatment among patients with ovarian cancer in the pre-PARP inhibitor era: the OCRWE-Finland Study

Background: As the treatment landscape for advanced ovarian cancer (OC) evolves, it is important to understand patient outcomes in real-world clinical practice. OCRWE-Finland was an observational cohort study investigating OC outcomes, including treatment patterns, time to next treatment 1 (TTNT1), overall survival and healthcare resource utilisation, in Finland during the pre-PARPi era. Materials and methods: Patients included in OCRWE-Finland were diagnosed with OC between 2014 and 2019. Here, we report treatment patterns and TTNT1 outcomes (as a surrogate for progression-free survival) for patients in the high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) cohort. Results: In OCRWE-Finland, there were 867 patients with HGSOC. Of the 811 patients who received first-line treatment, the most common regimen was surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (53%), and 227 patients also received first-line bevacizumab. Median TTNT1 among 623 patients with stage III/IV disease was 19 months (95% confidence interval, 18–21 months), with no difference between patients with stage III or IV disease (p = 0.24). The presence versus absence of visible residual disease post-debulking surgery was associated with shorter TTNT1 among patients with stage III tumours (p = 0.031) but showed no impact for stage IV tumours (p = 0.55). First-line versus no first-line bevacizumab was associated with shorter TTNT1 among stages I–IV (p &lt; 0.0001) but did not affect patients with stage III/IV tumours (p = 0.45). Interpretation: In the pre-PARPi era, prognosis for advanced OC was poor, particularly for patients with stage III tumours and visible residual disease or stage IV tumours regardless of the presence of residual disease. The increasing use of PARPis will hopefully help address the need for effective treatments in advanced OC.

104Works
8Papers
62Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm StagingNeoplasms

Positions

2009–

Chief of Dept.

Turku University Hospital · Dept. of Obst. & Gyn./Gyn Oncology

Education

2024

Professor

University of Turku · Dept. of Obst. & Gyn.