Investigator

Rowan T. Chlebowski

Harborucla Medical Center

RTCRowan T. Chlebows…
Papers(2)
Cardiometabolic risk …Menopausal Hormone Th…
Collaborators(9)
Theresa A HastertCarolyn D. RunowiczHolly R. HarrisJean Wactawski-WendeJennifer L. Beebe‐Dim…Kathy PanMichael S. SimonMihae SongReina Haque
Institutions(9)
Harborucla Medical Ce…Wayne State Universit…Florida International…Fred Hutch Cancer Cen…University at Buffalo…The Barbara Ann Karma…Unknown InstitutionCity Of Hope National…Kaiser Permanente Sou…

Papers

Cardiometabolic risk factors and survival after cancer in the Women's Health Initiative

BackgroundCardiometabolic abnormalities are a leading cause of death among women, including women with cancer.MethodsThis study examined the association between prediagnosis cardiovascular health and total and cause‐specific mortality among 12,076 postmenopausal women who developed local‐ or regional‐stage invasive cancer in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). Cardiovascular risk factors included waist circumference, hypertension, high cholesterol, and type 2 diabetes. Obesity‐related cancers included breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for important predictors of survival.ResultsAfter a median follow‐up of 10.0 years from the date of the cancer diagnosis, there were 3607 total deaths, with 1546 (43%) due to cancer. Most participants (62.9%) had 1 or 2 cardiometabolic risk factors, and 8.1% had 3 or 4. In adjusted models, women with 3 to 4 risk factors (vs none) had a higher risk of all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.73‐2.30), death due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.88‐5.57), cancer‐specific mortality (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.1‐1.72), and other‐cause mortality (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.70‐2.69). A higher waist circumference was associated with greater all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06‐1.30) and cancer‐specific mortality (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04‐1.42).ConclusionsAmong postmenopausal women diagnosed with cancer in the WHI, cardiometabolic risk factors before the cancer diagnosis were associated with greater all‐cause, CVD, cancer‐specific, and other‐cause mortality. These results raise hypotheses regarding potential clinical intervention strategies targeting cardiometabolic abnormalities that require future prospective studies for confirmation.Lay Summary This study uses information from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) to find out whether cardiac risk factors are related to a greater risk of dying among older women with cancer. The WHI is the largest study of medical problems faced by older women in this country. The results show that women who have 3 or 4 risk factors are more likely to die of any cause, heart disease, or cancer in comparison with women with no risk factors. It is concluded that interventions to help to lower the burden of cardiac risk factors can have an important impact on survivorship among women with cancer.

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trials

PURPOSE Menopausal hormone therapy's influence on ovarian and endometrial cancers remains unsettled. Therefore, we assessed the long-term influence of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and CEE-alone on ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence and mortality in the Women's Health Initiative randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Postmenopausal women, age 50-79 years, were entered on two randomized clinical trials evaluating different menopausal hormone therapy regimens. In 16,608 women with a uterus, 8,506 were randomly assigned to once daily 0.625 mg of CEE plus 2.5 mg once daily of MPA and 8,102 placebo. In 10,739 women with previous hysterectomy, 5,310 were randomly assigned to once daily 0.625 mg of CEE-alone and 5,429 placebo. Intervention was stopped for cause before planned 8.5-year intervention after 5.6 years (CEE plus MPA) and after 7.2 years (CEE-alone). Outcomes include incidence and mortality from ovarian and endometrial cancers and deaths after these cancers. RESULTS After 20-year follow-up, CEE-alone, versus placebo, significantly increased ovarian cancer incidence (35 cases [0.041%] v 17 [0.020%]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.04 [95% CI, 1.14 to 3.65]; P = .014) and ovarian cancer mortality ( P = .006). By contrast, CEE plus MPA, versus placebo, did not increase ovarian cancer incidence (75 cases [0.051%] v 63 [0.045%]; HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.59]; P = .44) or ovarian cancer mortality but did significantly lower endometrial cancer incidence (106 cases [0.073%] v 140 [0.10%]; HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.92]; P = .01). CONCLUSION In randomized clinical trials, CEE-alone increased ovarian cancer incidence and ovarian cancer mortality, while CEE plus MPA did not. By contrast, CEE plus MPA significantly reduced endometrial cancer incidence.

2Papers
9Collaborators
Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsEndometrial NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsMetabolic SyndromeCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCardiovascular Diseases