Investigator

Rodrigo Pinto Fernandes

Assistant/Professor · Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Gynecology

RPFRodrigo Pinto Fer…
Papers(2)
Analysis of Sentinel …Persistent postoperat…
Collaborators(10)
Jesus Paula CarvalhoCristina AntonAndre LopesJosé Antônio Orellana…Maria Luiza GentaMarília BertolazziRafael Bispo Paschoal…Rossana Veronica Mend…Ricardo dos ReisArnaud Wattiez
Institutions(5)
Instituto Do Cncer Do…A. C. Camargo Cancer …Universidade De So Pa…Hospital de Cancer de…Universit De Strasbou…

Papers

Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Node Adoption Compared to Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Staging Early Endometrial Cancer at a Tertiary Center: An Ambispective Study

ABSTRACTObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the impact of changing endometrial carcinoma staging from systematic lymph node dissection to the sentinel lymph node approach.MethodsThis is an ambispective study including patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) limited to the uterus (FIGO 2018 IA/IB). From December 2015 to October 2021, a group of patients underwent systematic staging with lymph node dissection (LND). From December 2021 to April 2024, another group of patients underwent surgical staging with the sentinel lymph node‐indocyanine green (SLN) algorithm and pathology ultrastaging analisys. The groups were matched (1 LND: 1 SLN) based on age, body mass index (BMI), tumor type, tumor size, and myometrial invasion. The primary endpoints were lymph node involvement, length of surgery, and complications. Complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0.ResultsTwo hundred fifty‐seven patients were surgically treated during the study period (156 in the LND cohort, 101 in the SLN cohort). Propensity score matching revealed two equivalent groups containing 84 patients each. The rate of positive lymph nodes was similar between the LND group (3.6%) and the SLN group (8.3%) (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 0.61–9.84; p = 0.205). The length of surgery was significantly lower in the SLN group (152.2 ± 51.9 min) compared to the LND group (304 ± 77.8 min) (p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss greater than 100 mL was significantly lower in the SLN group (9.5%) compared to the LND group (29.8%) (p < 0.001). CTCAE grades requiring intervention (grades 3, 4, and 5) were higher in the LND group (14.3%) compared to the SLN group (4.8%) (p = 0.049).ConclusionThe transition from LND to SLN approach was similar compared to systematic lymphadenectomy, allowing the reduction of surgical length, blood loss and severity of complications without compromising surgical complications and lymph node positivity.

10Works
2Papers
11Collaborators

Positions

2014–

Assistant/Professor

Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · Gynecology

Country

BR

Keywords
uterine neoplasmssentinel lymph node