Robert W Holloway

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with bevacizumab for locally advanced vulvar cancer

External beam radiation with sensitizing platinum is the recommended therapy for locally advanced vulvar cancers not amenable to curative surgery and is associated with considerable acute and chronic side effects. Radical vulvectomy post-radiation for persistent disease is often compromised with poor wound healing. We describe clinical outcomes for patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab followed by radical vulvectomy for locally advanced vulvar cancer. We performed retrospective analyses of all patients at our institution who underwent radical vulvectomy from January 2015 to November 2023. Of 113 patients, 13 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Demographics and clinicopathologic data were extracted, and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were further evaluated for response, adverse effects, and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 13 patients with stage II-IV disease that involved the urethra, vagina, or anus. Lesion sizes ranged from 4 to 20 cm (median 7 cm). Patients received 2-6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. Nine (69.2%) patients had partial pathologic responses, and four patients had complete responses. All patients had negative surgical margins. Ten (76.9%) patients had radiographic evidence of inguinal lymph node metastasis prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and four had residual nodal disease. Only one patient developed a superficial groin seroma. Three patients developed recurrence, two locally and one distant, and there was one death. The median follow-up was 23 months (range 6-84 months). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy using combination platinum/paclitaxel/bevacizumab was efficacious for locally advanced vulvar cancer, resulting in complete resections, negative margins, and excellent wound healing. A multi-institutional phase II trial is warranted to validate these findings.

Rucaparib for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian carcinoma: Final results of the phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled ARIEL3 trial.

In ARIEL3, rucaparib maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and long-term follow-up (LTFU) outcomes (including PFS2: time to disease progression on subsequent therapy or death) versus placebo in patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Here we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS; key secondary endpoint), LTFU outcomes, and safety. OS and updated LTFU efficacy outcomes were analyzed (data cutoff date: April 4, 2022) across three nested populations (BRCA-mutated, homologous recombination deficient [HRD], and intention to treat [ITT]). Patients were randomized 2:1 to rucaparib (600 mg BID; n = 375) or placebo (n = 189). Median follow-up was 77.0 months. 168 patients in the placebo arm received subsequent treatment; of these, 77 (46 %) received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor-containing treatment. Median OS from randomization post chemotherapy for rucaparib vs placebo was 45.9 vs 47.8 months (HR 0.83, 95 % CI 0.58-1.19) for the BRCA-mutated population; no OS benefit was found with rucaparib in the HRD and ITT populations. Median PFS2 for rucaparib vs placebo was 26.1 vs 18.4 months (HR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.48-0.94) for the BRCA-mutated population. Rucaparib numerically improved PFS2 and other LTFU outcomes versus placebo in the HRD and ITT populations. Safety was consistent with prior reports; myelodysplastic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 4 % and 3 % of patients in the rucaparib and placebo arms, respectively. OS was similar between treatment arms. PFS benefit with rucaparib was maintained through the subsequent therapy line. These data support rucaparib as maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

Efficacy and Safety of Avutometinib ± Defactinib in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Primary Analysis of ENGOT-OV60/GOG-3052/RAMP 201

PURPOSE This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avutometinib (rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma/mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase [MEK] clamp) alone or in combination with defactinib (focal adhesion kinase inhibitor) in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). METHODS In this phase II, open-label study, patients with recurrent, measurable LGSOC after ≥1 line of platinum chemotherapy were stratified by tumor Kirsten rat sarcoma virus homolog ( KRAS ) mutation status and randomly assigned to oral avutometinib 4.0 mg two times per week monotherapy or avutometinib 3.2 mg two times per week in combination with oral defactinib 200 mg two times per day. The combination was selected as the go-forward regimen for expansion. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. RESULTS A total of 115 patients received the go-forward combination regimen. Patients had a median of 3 (range, 1-9) prior lines of therapy, including hormonal (86%), bevacizumab (51%), and MEK inhibitor (22%). Confirmed ORR was 31% (95% CI, 23% to 41%) with a median duration of response of 31.1 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 31.1). ORR was 44% in KRAS- mutant and 17% in KRAS wild-type cohorts. The median progression-free survival was 12.9 months (95% CI, 10.9 to 20.2) overall and 22.0 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 36.6) and 12.8 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 18.4) in KRAS- mutant and wild-type cohorts, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were elevated creatine phosphokinase (24%), diarrhea (8%), and anemia (5%). Ten percent of patients discontinued because of AEs. CONCLUSION The efficacy and safety profile of avutometinib in combination with defactinib support this combination as a potential standard of care for recurrent LGSOC. A randomized phase 3 study of avutometinib and defactinib versus investigator's choice of therapy for women with recurrent LGSOC is currently enrolling (RAMP301; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06072781 ).

A phase III, multicenter, randomized study of olvimulogene nanivacirepvec followed by platinum-doublet chemotherapy and bevacizumab compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and bevacizumab in women with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer

Treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancers are limited and only marginally effective. The development of novel, more effective therapies addresses a critical unmet medical need. Olvimulogene nanivacirepvec (Olvi-Vec), with its strong immune modulating effect on the tumor microenvironment, may provide re-sensitization to platinum and clinically reverse platinum resistance or refractoriness in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of intra-peritoneal Olvi-Vec followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. This phase III study investigates Olvi-Vec oncolytic immunotherapy followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab as an immunochemotherapy evaluating the hypothesis that such sequential combination therapy will prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and bring other clinical benefits compared with treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and active-controlled phase III trial. Patients will be randomized 2:1 into the experimental arm treated with Olvi-Vec followed by platinum-doublet chemotherapy and bevacizumab or the control arm treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Eligible patients must have recurrent, platinum-resistant/refractory, non-resectable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or clear-cell ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients must have had ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is PFS in the intention-to-treat population. Approximately 186 patients (approximately 124 patients randomized to the experimental arm and 62 to the control arm) will be enrolled to capture 127 PFS events. Expected complete accrual in 2024 with presentation of primary endpoint results in 2025. NCT05281471.

A Phase Ib Study of Indirect Immunization with Oregovomab and Toll-like-Receptor-3 Stimulation with Hiltonol® in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Objectives: This phase Ib study assessed the safety and compatibility of indirect oregovomab immunization and Toll-like-receptor-3 (TLR3) stimulation with immune adjuvant Hiltonol® (poly-ICLC) and induced clinically relevant CA125-specific anti-tumor immunity in heavily pretreated patients with progressive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). Methods: Patients with elevated serum CA125 level >50 U/mL received four intravenous infusions with 2 mg oregovomab followed by 2 mg Hiltonol® intramuscular 30 min and 48 h post-oregovomab at weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9. At week 12, imaging was performed, and salvage chemotherapy was allowed post-progression per the investigator’s discretion. The Fifth/final oregovomab with Hiltonol® infusion was given at week 16. Results: Fifteen enrolled patients were analyzed for safety and efficacy. Thirteen (87%) patients completed at least three Hiltonol® infusions with oregovomab, specifically, two cycles (n = 2), three cycles (n = 2), four cycles (n = 3), and five cycles (n = 8). Adverse events included mild fatigue, flu-like symptoms, chills, axillary pain, and injection site discomfort in 13 (87%) patients. Serious adverse events were reported in seven (47%) patients, including Grade 3 hypertension (n = 2), thrombocytopenia (n = 1), and Grade 3 events attributed to underlying disease (n = 4). Ten (67%) patients had disease progression, three (20%) had stable disease, and two were unevaluable. Early humoral response by week 6 was observed in seven of nine (77%) patients, median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 3.3), and median overall survival was 15.0 months (95% CI: 8.2–23.9). Conclusions: The safety and compatibility of combining oregovomab with Hiltonol® have been demonstrated in this study. The potential to enhance activity of chemotherapy using oregovomab indirect immunization and Hiltonol® stimulation is proposed.

Using Circulating Tumor DNA–Based Molecular Residual Disease Detection for Postoperative Monitoring in Early-Stage Uterine Cancer

PURPOSE Clinical decision making for adjuvant treatment in early-stage uterine cancer (UC) following surgery is typically directed by clinicopathological risk factors. There is an unmet need for a clinically relevant biomarker to improve individualized risk stratification and help monitor response to adjuvant therapy. Here, we sought to analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic biomarker in patients with early-stage UC. METHODS Retrospective analysis of ctDNA results from real-world data was performed for 61 patients (233 plasma time points) diagnosed with early-stage UC. ctDNA status and dynamics were assessed using a clinically validated, personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera), and its association with recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated. RESULTS ctDNA positivity was associated with significantly reduced RFS postoperatively (hazard ratio [HR], 7.6; P = .003) and postdefinitive therapy (HR, 25.4; P = .0009) and was the most significant factor associated with recurrence when compared with other clinicopathological and molecular risk factors. Notably, of patients who recurred and for whom clinical outcomes were available, 100% were ctDNA-positive before or at the time of recurrence, whereas none of the serially ctDNA-negative patients experienced relapse. CONCLUSION Our data demonstrate the feasibility of monitoring ctDNA in the postoperative and adjuvant settings in early-stage UC. Analysis of ctDNA, in addition to other risk factors, may help identify patients at the highest risk of recurrence, inform surveillance strategies, and support treatment decision-making for these patients.