Robert Jach

Impact of Vaccinating Adult Women Who Are HPV-Positive or with Confirmed Cervical SIL with the 9-Valent Vaccine—A Systematic Review

Infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) remains a leading cause of cervical cancer and other HPV-related diseases. This situation persists despite the availability of effective prophylactic vaccines. While global vaccination programs have significantly reduced the incidence of HPV in adolescents and young adults, many women presenting with HPV infection or squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) were not covered by primary prevention. This review was performed with the aim of evaluating the impact of administering the 9-valent HPV vaccine in adult women who are HPV-positive or have histologically confirmed cervical precancerous lesions. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a search was performed in the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. A total of 653 studies were retrieved, of which 7 studies, including 19,414 women, met the inclusion criteria. According to the literature, vaccination was linked to significant reductions in persistent HPV infection, progression of SIL, and recurrence of high-grade lesions after surgical removal. Complete HPV remission was achieved in up to 72.4% of vaccinated women, compared to 45.7% among unvaccinated controls. Vaccination after conization lowered the recurrence risk of CIN2+ lesions by 87%, with benefits seen regardless of timing. The most significant effect was observed when vaccine administration was performed before the surgical procedure. Furthermore, HPV vaccination notably enhanced viral clearance and decreased the likelihood of repeated surgical interventions. Despite differences in study design and follow-up definitions, the overall evidence supports additional vaccination in HPV-positive adult women as an effective measure to reduce recurrence and promote viral remission. These findings emphasize the need for clear guidelines and wider access to HPV vaccination for adult populations.

Evaluation of the Use of Methylation as a New Tool for the Diagnostics and Progression of Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) significantly reduces the incidence of HPV-related lesions worldwide. Considering the increasingly young age of patients in gynecological offices and earlier sexual initiation and potential contact with the HPV virus, doctors need the tools to verify diagnoses. Currently, women plan to pursue motherhood later, so it is necessary to consider whether sexual treatment in the form of, among others, loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEPs) may increase the risk of premature birth or difficulty dilating the cervix during labour. For this reason, to avoid the overtreatment of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), methylation testing may be considered. In patients with histopathologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) during biopsy and, ultimately, a lower diagnosis, i.e., LSIL or no signs of atypia, methylation was found to be a useful tool. We performed a Pap smear, HPV genotyping, a punch biopsy, LEEP-conization (if needed), and methylation tests on 108 women admitted to the District Public Hospital in Poland. Women with a negative methylation test result were significantly more likely to be ultimately diagnosed with LSIL (p = 0.013). This means that in 85.7% of the patients with HSIL, major cervical surgery could be avoided if the methylation test was negative. Methylation testing, as well as dual-staining and diagnostics detecting the mRNA transcripts of highly oncogenic types of HPV, might be used in the future in the diagnosis of pre-cancerous conditions, mainly of the cervix, and in HPV-dependent cervical cancer screening. The methylation test may also be used in the diagnosis and identification of lesions within the cervical canal, including those located deep within the frontal crypts, not visible even during a professional colposcopic evaluation of the cervix.

Should we use risk selection tests for HPV 16 and/or 18 positive cases: Comparison of p16/Ki67 and cytology

AbstractMajor screening abnormalities in precolposcopic stage are tests results that imply direct referral to colposcopy (and/or expedited treatment) without performing additional high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+) risk selection testing. Currently, both clinically validated HSIL+ risk selection tests, reflex cytology and reflex p16/Ki67 dual staining (DS), are being compared for use in primary human papillomavirus (HPV)‐based screening to avoid possible overtreatment, but there is still no sufficient data available for their performance. Among 30 066 liquid‐based cervical cancer screening tests results, a group of 332 women was selected with available high‐risk types of HPV tests results with 16/18 limited genotyping, liquid‐based cytology, DS, and histology results from standardized colposcopy with biopsy. In HPV 16/18+ cases, three triage approaches were retrospectively analyzed. Predictive values for detection of HSIL+ were calculated and number of colposcopies required in each strategy. Both triage models with DS used (reflex cytology followed by DS, and reflex DS alone in all cases) had significantly higher positive predictive value for HSIL+ than strategy with reflex cytology alone (44.2%/45.7% vs. 28.3%; p < 0.0001). In models with DS, less colposcopies were required (95/92 vs. 152) and less colposcopies were needed per HSIL+ detection (2.26/2.19 vs. 3.54). Only one HSIL+ case was missed in both triage models with DS incorporation. p16/Ki67 dual‐stain may be an effective, alone or combined with cytology, triage test to detect HSIL+ in patients with major screening abnormalities in primary HPV‐based cervical cancer screening. Performing cytology as the first triage test improves the strategy by enabling referrals to expedited treatment in selected cases.

Clinical use of the Onclarity test with extended HPV genotyping and phenotyping in patients with suspected squamous intraepithelial lesions

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most widespread virus with oncogenic potential that infects humans and there is a need to look for the most effective screening method among the population. Understanding the role of HPV in cervical dysplasia and viruses typing increased the usage of HPV-based cervical cancer screening tests using genotyping. We aim to assess the usefulness the Onclarity Test with extended genotyping and phenotyping of HPV in detecting cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in 695 subjects who registered for regular cervical screening or due to abnormal LBC result or positive HPV results. Incidence of positive HPV depended significantly on biopsy outcome (p < 0.001). It was the highest for patients with HSIL (92.5%), lower for patients with LSIL (57.9%) and with HPV outcome of biopsy (50.0%). The sensitivity of positive HPV for detecting HSIL was equal to 92.50% (95% CI: 79.61%-98.43%), and specificity equalled 55.26% (95% CI: 43.41-66.69%). Sensitivity of HPV positive for any of 16, 18, 31, 45, 51 or 52 genotypes but not belonging to the P1, P2 or P3 group for detecting HSIL equalled 62.50% (95% CI: 45.80-77.27%), specificity equalled 72.37% (95% CI: 60.91-82.01%). The Onclarity test is characterised by high sensitivity and specificity in detecting CIN2+ lesions. Extended genotyping enables the identification of the most common oncogenic HPV types in the population. It can be used as a basic tool for secondary prevention or together with LBC.

p16/Ki67 dual stain triage versus cytology in primary human papillomavirus‐based cervical cancer screening with limited genotyping

AbstractThe introduction of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening requires the implementation of an appropriate triage strategy that will be effective in detecting high‐grade cervical disease without losing diagnostic specificity. From the 30.066 screening tests results, a total of 1086 with available high‐risk human papillomavirus (HRHPV) with limited genotyping, cytology, and p16/Ki67 dual‐stain were selected. Two triage strategies for primary HPV screening were analyzed retrospectively based on the study group. Performance characteristics for p16/Ki67 and cytology triage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) were calculated, detected in colposcopic biopsy. In HPV16/18‐positive cases, primary HPV with p16/Ki67 triage was significantly more specific than cytology (53.1%/16.8% for CIN2+; p &lt; 0.0001; 45.9%/17.0% for CIN3+; p &lt; 0.0001), with yielded sensitivity (95.7%/84.8% for CIN2+; p = 0.0955; 100.0%/87.5% for CIN3+; p = 0.0832). In other HRHPV‐positive cases (N16/N18), p16/Ki67 triage was also significantly higher specific (51.3%/15.3% for CIN2+; p &lt; 0.0001; 44.5%/16.5% for CIN3+; p &lt; 0.0001), with sensitivity (92.3%/74.4% for CIN2+; p = 0.0522; 90.9%/81.8% for CIN3+; p = 0.5637). Diagnostic predictive values were significantly higher for p16/Ki67 triage with the highest PPV in HPV16/18‐positive cases for CIN2+ (45.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.2–55.8; p &lt; 0.0001) and very high NPV in all HPV‐positive cases regardless of detected genotype (96.3%–100.0%). The risk (1‐NPV) for CIN3+ in HRHPV16/18‐positive/p16/Ki67‐negative women was 0.0%. Superior diagnostic performance compared to cytology for detecting cervical cancer precursors indicates that p16/Ki67 dual‐immunostain may be a highly effective tool of triage in primary HPV screening with limited HPV 16/18 genotyping in secondary cervical cancer prevention.