Rita Trozzi

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Trial on Survival Evaluation (HORSE; MITO-18)

PURPOSE To investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) without neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a benefit on progression-free survival (PFS), as opposed to SCS alone in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (platinum-free interval, >6 months). METHODS This was a multicenter randomized phase III study. Random assignment was performed at the time of surgery in cases with residual tumor ≤0.25 cm. HIPEC with cisplatin (CDDP) 75 mg/m 2 for 60 minutes at 41.5°C was administered at the end of surgery in the experimental arm. Both groups received postoperative platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was PFS. The safety profile and postrecurrence survival (PRS) were the secondary end points. RESULTS A total of 167 patients underwent random assignment, 82 patients to SCS plus HIPEC (experimental arm) and 85 to SCS alone (control arm). The median follow-up was 83 months (IQR, 64-102). The median PFS was 23 months (95% CI, 17 to 29) in the group that underwent surgery alone and 25 months (95% CI, 18 to 32) in the group that underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC. The probability of PRS at 5 years was 61.6% (95% CI, 50.8 to 72.4) in the SCS group and 75.9% (95% CI, 66.5 to 85.3) in the SCS plus HIPEC group. The incidence of postoperative adverse events of any grade was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION The addition of HIPEC to complete or nearly complete primary SCS did not confer a benefit in terms of PFS in patients with platinum-sensitive peritoneal recurrence.

POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma: Clinical and genomic landscape from a large prospective single‐center cohort

AbstractBackgroundTo date, 11 DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE) pathogenic variants have been declared “hotspot” mutations. Patients with endometrial cancer (EC) characterized by POLE hotspot mutations (POLEmut) have exceptional survival outcomes. Whereas international guidelines encourage deescalation of adjuvant treatment in early‐stage POLEmut EC, data regarding safety in POLEmut patients with unfavorable characteristics are still under investigation. On the other hand, the spread of comprehensive genome profiling programs has underscored the need to interpret POLE variants not considered to be hotspots.MethodsThis study provides a comprehensive analysis of 596 sequenced patients with EC. The genomic landscape of POLEmut EC was compared with cases harboring nonhotspot POLE mutations within the exonuclease domain. Additionally, the genomic characteristics of multiple classifiers, as well as those exhibiting unfavorable histopathological and clinical features, were examined.ResultsNo significant genomic differences were observed among patients with POLEmut EC when comparing multiple classifiers to not‐multiple classifiers or those with unfavorable clinical features. However, the tumor mutational burden differed in both comparisons, whereas the percentage of C>G mutations only differed in the comparison based on clinical features. Specific POLE mutations, even if not considered to be hotspots, have genomic features comparable to POLEmut.ConclusionsThe present findings confirm the absence of significant genomic differences among POLEmut patients regardless of multiple‐classifier status or association with high‐risk clinical features. Prognostic data will be essential to elucidate the clinical significance of POLE mutations not classified as hotspots that exhibit genomic characteristics similar to those in POLEmut patients.

An open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center, tandem two-stage designed phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in women with recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive gynecological malignancies (FUCHSia study)

This study aimed to evaluate fulvestrant efficacy in women with estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological cancers. The primary objective was to determine the response rate. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, clinical benefit, duration of response, safety, tolerability, and quality of life. FUCHSia is an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-center phase II study. The study population included patients with recurrent/metastatic low-grade gynecological malignancies with estrogen receptor positivity who received a maximum of two lines of previous hormonal therapy. Patients received fulvestrant (FASLODEX, AstraZeneca) via two intramuscular injections (250 mg/5 mL each) in the gluteal muscle on day 1, day 15, day 29, and then every 28 days thereafter until disease progression, withdrawal from the trial due to any unacceptable adverse event, or withdrawal of patient consent. A total of 15 patients (uterine sarcoma n=4; sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors n=3; endometrial carcinoma n=4; serous ovarian cancer n=4) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 48 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 26-122) in the uterine sarcoma cohort, 63 weeks (IQR 28-77) for sex cord-stromal tumors, 19 weeks (IQR 17-21) for endometrial carcinoma, and 60 weeks (IQR 40-119) for serous ovarian cancer. One partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 was observed in one uterine sarcoma patient. No responses were observed in the other cohorts. However, stable disease was observed in three uterine sarcomas (median duration 12 weeks), three sex cord-stromal tumors (median duration 32 weeks), and four low-grade serous ovarian cancer patients (median duration 20 weeks), leading to a disease control rate of 100% for these tumor types. All patients with endometrial carcinoma showed progressive disease. Fulvestrant may control tumor growth in recurrent/metastatic estrogen receptor-positive low-grade gynecological malignancies of specific histology. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Gene actionability according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) in No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) endometrial cancer

The No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) subtype accounts for ∼30%-40% of endometrial cancer (EC), comprising a heterogeneous group of EC. The primary outcome of this study was the prevalence of actionable genomic alterations in NSMP EC, classified according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT). Oncogenic and likely oncogenic alterations, pathways, and co-mutation patterns were reported. The analysis was stratified by risk group according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO)-ESMO-European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) guidelines. Patients with NSMP EC enrolled in the FPG500 comprehensive cancer genome profiling program (NCT06020625) were included. Two hundred and fifty-three patients with NSMP EC of any International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage were enrolled between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023. Median age was 62 years, and the most frequent histotype was endometrioid (97%). Ninety-five percent of patients were estrogen receptor positive. Two hundred and thirty-three patients (92%) had at least one ESCAT tier I-III alteration. The most frequent variants were in PTEN [88%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 92%], PIK3CA (42%, 95% CI 36% to 49%), FGFR2 (15%, 95% CI 11% to 20%), and AKT1 (6%, 95% CI 3% to 10%); 4% (95% CI 2% to 8%) of patients had an ESR1 variant, while KRAS G12C was found in 3% (95% CI 1% to 6%) of patients. The majority of PTEN variants were on the R130 hotspot. More frequent PIK3CA hotspot variants were H1047R (9%), E545D/K/Q/A (6%), and E542K (4%). In the overall population, PIK3CA with PIK3R1 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.07, P value = 4.25 × 10 Our findings highlight potentially actionable alterations in NSMP EC patients, supporting the exploration of tailored molecular-matched therapies according to risk groups.

Hyperthermic Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer Recurrence

The purpose of this study is to determine the role of surgery followed by hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) versus surgery alone in patients with platinum-sensitive first recurrence of ovarian cancer. Moreover it is a prospective randomized multicenter trial, aimed to investigate the prognostic role of surgery plus HIPEC versus surgery alone in terms of progression free interval, overall survival, morbidity and mortality, second recurrence pattern, quality of life with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ OV28 questionnaires.