Investigator

Rianne van den Helder

PhD student · Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Centre of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Gynecologic Oncology

RVDRianne van den He…
Papers(4)
DNA Methylation Marke…Recurrent cervical ca…HPV and DNA Methylati…<scp>DNA</scp> methyl…
Collaborators(10)
Renske DM SteenbergenMaaike CG BleekerNienke E van TrommelConstantijne H. MomBirgit MM WeverW. Marchien van BaalJip A van TrommelJohannes CF KetLisanne VerhoefMirte Schaafsma
Institutions(4)
Vrije Universiteit Am…The Netherlands Cance…FlevoziekenhuisAmsterdam UMC, locati…

Papers

Recurrent cervical cancer detection using DNA methylation markers in self‐collected samples from home

AbstractEarly detection of recurrent cervical cancer is important to improve survival rates. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical performance of DNA methylation markers and high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervicovaginal self‐samples and urine for the detection of recurrent cervical cancer. Cervical cancer patients without recurrence (n = 47) collected cervicovaginal self‐samples and urine pre‐ and posttreatment. Additionally, 20 patients with recurrent cervical cancer collected cervicovaginal self‐samples and urine at time of recurrence. All samples were self‐collected at home and tested for DNA methylation and high‐risk HPV DNA by PCR. In patients without recurrent cervical cancer, DNA methylation levels decreased 2‐years posttreatment compared to pretreatment in cervicovaginal self‐samples (p &lt; .0001) and urine (p &lt; .0001). DNA methylation positivity in cervicovaginal self‐samples was more frequently observed in patients with recurrence (77.8%) than in patients without recurrence 2‐years posttreatment (25.5%; p = .0004). Also in urine, DNA methylation positivity was more frequently observed in patients with recurrence (65%) compared to those without recurrence (35.6%; p = .038). Similarly, high‐risk HPV positivity in both cervicovaginal self‐samples and urine was more frequent (52.6% and 55%, respectively) in patients with recurrence compared to patients without recurrence (14.9% and 8.5%, respectively) (p = .004 and p = .0001). In conclusion, this study shows the potential of posttreatment monitoring of cervical cancer patients for recurrence by DNA methylation and high‐risk HPV testing in cervicovaginal and urine samples collected at home. The highest recurrence detection rate was achieved by DNA methylation testing in cervicovaginal self‐samples, detecting 77.8% of all recurrences and, specifically, 100% of the local recurrences.

HPV and DNA Methylation Testing in Urine for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer Detection

Abstract Purpose: Biomarker detection in urine offers a potential solution to increase effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs by attracting nonresponders. In this prospective study, the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA and the performance of DNA methylation analysis was determined for the detection of cervical cancer and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) in urine, and compared with paired cervicovaginal self-samples and clinician-taken cervical scrapes. Experimental Design: A total of 587 samples were included from 113 women with cervical cancer, 92 women with CIN2/3, and 64 controls. Samples were tested for hrHPV DNA and five methylation markers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and leave-one-out cross-validation were used to determine the methylation marker performance for CIN3 and cervical cancer (CIN3+) detection in urine. Agreement between samples was determined using Cohen kappa statistics and the Spearman correlation coefficients. Results: HrHPV presence was high in all sample types, 79% to 92%. Methylation levels of all markers in urine significantly increased with increasing severity of disease. The optimal marker panel (ASCL1/LHX8) resulted in an AUC of 0.84 for CIN3+ detection in urine, corresponding to an 86% sensitivity at a 70% predefined specificity. At this threshold 96% (109/113) of cervical cancers, 68% (46/64) of CIN3, and 58% (14/24) of CIN2 were detected. Between paired samples, a strong agreement for HPV16/18 genotyping and a fair to strong correlation for methylation was found. Conclusions: HrHPV DNA and DNA methylation testing in urine offers a promising solution to detect cervical cancer and CIN2/3 lesions, especially for women currently unreached by conventional screening methods.

DNA methylation testing for endometrial cancer detection in urine, cervicovaginal self‐samples and cervical scrapes

AbstractEndometrial cancer incidence is rising and current diagnostics often require invasive biopsy procedures. DNA methylation marker analysis of minimally‐ and non‐invasive sample types could provide an easy‐to‐apply and patient‐friendly alternative to determine cancer risk. Here, we compared the performance of DNA methylation markers to detect endometrial cancer in urine, cervicovaginal self‐samples and clinician‐taken cervical scrapes. Paired samples were collected from 103 patients diagnosed with stage I to IV endometrial cancer. Urine and self‐samples were collected at home. All samples were tested for nine DNA methylation markers using quantitative methylation‐specific PCR. Methylation levels measured in endometrial cancer patients were compared to unpaired samples of 317 healthy controls. Diagnostic performances were evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis, followed by leave‐one‐out cross‐validation. Each methylation marker showed significantly higher methylation levels in all sample types of endometrial cancer patients compared to healthy controls (P &lt; .01). Optimal three‐marker combinations demonstrated excellent diagnostic performances with area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92‐0.98), 0.94 (0.90‐0.97) and 0.97 (0.96‐0.99), for endometrial cancer detection in urine, self‐samples and scrapes, respectively. Sensitivities ranged from 89% to 93% at specificities of 90% to 92%. Virtually equal performances were obtained after cross‐validation and excellent diagnostic performances were maintained for stage I endometrial cancer detection. Our study shows the value of methylation analysis in patient‐friendly sample types for endometrial cancer detection of all stages. This approach has great potential to screen patient populations at risk for endometrial cancer.

Clinical Trials (3)

NCT07400835University of Aarhus

Evaluation of DNA Methylation Markers for Endometrial Cancer Risk-stratification Using Patient-collected Urine and Vaginal Samples and Clinician-collected Cervical Samples From Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding

The goal of this observational study is to investigate the clinical utility of DNA-methylation testing in urine and vaginal samples collected by patients and cervical samples collected by clinicians, to determine the risk of endometrial cancer in symptomatic women with postmenopausal bleeding. The study aims to answer the following research questions: * What is the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation testing in urine, vaginal and cervical samples compared to traditional TVUS for endometrial cancer detection? * What is the 2-year risk of EC among women testing negative on TVUS and/or DNA methylation tests or those testing positive on methylation only? Researchers will compare DNA methylation testing in patient-collected urine and vaginal samples as well as in clinician-collected cervical samples, with the traditional diagnostic pathway for women with PMB, which includes TVUS evaluation, and when indicated by abnormal TVUS findings, endometrial biopsy according to clinical guidelines. Participants will * take a urine and vaginal sample * have a cervical sample collected by a clinician * undergo TVUS evaluation according to clinical guidelines * If TVUS shows thickened endometrium (≥ 5 mm) and/or irregularity, an endometrial biopsy will be collected according to clinical guidelines * fill out a questionnaire regarding acceptability and preferences of sampling methods and complete a lifestyle questionnaire.

1Works
4Papers
15Collaborators
3Trials

Positions

2018–

PhD student

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Centre of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam · Department of Gynecologic Oncology

2018–

PhD student

Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam · Department of Pathology