Renée M. F. Ebisch

Colposcopy referrals and CIN3 detection after triage by host cell DNA methylation and/or HPV genotyping in HPV positive women with low‐grade cytology from a population‐based Dutch primary HPV screening trial

AbstractHigh‐risk HPV (hrHPV)‐based screening has led to many unnecessary colposcopy referrals, mainly because of direct referral after low‐grade cytology (ASC‐US/LSIL). DNA methylation and genotyping tests on ASC‐US/LSIL samples have the potential to significantly improve the efficiency of screening. In this study, 12 triage strategies were constructed from FAM19A4/miR124‐2 or ASCL1/LHX8 methylation, HPV16/18 or HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping and 1‐year repeat cytology. The performance was evaluated on 215 hrHPV‐positive ASC‐US/LSIL samples from the IMPROVE trial (NTR5078). Performance was measured by colposcopy referral rate, positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting precancer (CIN3), and negative predictive value (NPV). To evaluate efficiency, strategies were ordered by the cumulative colposcopy referral rate after 1‐year cytology and compared by the marginal PPV to detect one additional CIN3 (mPPV). The most conservative strategy (referral when HPV16/18 and FAM19A4/miR124 methylation results are positive) had a direct referral rate of 5.2%, a cumulative referral rate after 1‐year cytology of 54.1%, and mPPV of 19.3%. Replacing HPV16/18 by HPV16/18/31/33/45 increased the cumulative 1‐year referral rate to 54.6%, and yielded an mPPV of 10.0%. Similar results were obtained for strategies with ASCL1/LHX8 methylation. Of all strategies, referral after an HPV16/18/31/33/45 positive, ASCL1/LHX8 methylation‐positive, and/or 1‐year cytology‐positive result yielded the highest direct and cumulative 1‐year colposcopy referral rates of 64.4% and 79.1%, respectively. The NPVs after 1‐year cytology varied between 98.1% and 99.4%, warranting a return to routine screening. Altogether, DNA methylation‐based triage strategies are recommended as they are discriminative for CIN3 and control the number of immediate colposcopy referrals.

The relative risk of noncervical high‐risk human papillomavirus‐related (pre)malignancies after recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: A population‐based study

Women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) have a long‐lasting increased risk for noncervical high‐risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)‐related (pre)malignancies. The aim of our study was to estimate this risk in women with recurrent CIN3 compared to women without a history of CIN3 and women with a single episode of CIN3. Women with a CIN3 diagnosis between 1990 and 2010 were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and matched with a control group of women without CIN3. Analysis has been conducted in a subset of women with recurrent CIN3, defined as reoccurrence minimally 2 years post‐treatment. Cases of noncervical hrHPV‐related (pre)malignancies of the anus, vulva, vagina and oropharynx were identified until 2015 and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated. Then, 1,797 women with recurrent CIN3 were included with a median age of 34 years (range 18–76) and 31,594 person‐years of follow‐up. Women with recurrent CIN3 had an increased risk of developing noncervical hrHPV‐related (pre)malignancies compared to women without CIN3 with an IRR of 25.96 (95%CI 6.32–106.58). The IRR was 2.48 (95% CI 1.87–3.30) compared to women with a single episode of CIN3. Studies on posttreatment follow‐up and prophylactic hrHPV vaccination are warranted.

Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry for optimizing management of CIN lesions in a high‐risk human papillomavirus‐positive population

AbstractIntroductionImmunostaining with p16INK4a (p16), a tumor‐suppressor surrogate protein biomarker for high‐risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) oncogenic activity, may complement standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology review, and provide more objective criteria to support the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis. With this study we assessed the impact of p16 immunohistochemistry on CIN grading in an hrHPV‐based screening setting.Material and methodsIn this post‐hoc analysis, 326 histology follow‐up samples from a group of hrHPV‐positive women were stained with p16 immunohistochemistry. All H&E samples were centrally revised. The pathologists reported their level of confidence in classifying the CIN lesion.ResultsCombining H&E and p16 staining resulted in a change of diagnosis in 27.3% (n = 89) of cases compared with the revised H&E samples, with a decrease of 34.5% (n = 18) in CIN1 and 22.7% (n = 15) in CIN2 classifications, and an increase of 18.3% (n = 19) in no CIN and 20.7% (n = 19) in CIN3 diagnoses. The level of confidence in CIN grading by the pathologist increased with adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E.ConclusionsThis study shows that adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to H&E morphology reduces the number of CIN1 and CIN2 classifications with a proportional increase in no CIN and CIN3 diagnoses, compared with standard H&E‐based CIN diagnosis alone. The pathologists felt more confident in classifying the material with H&E and p16 immunohistochemistry than by using H&E alone, particularly during assessment of small biopsies. Adjunctive use of p16 immunohistochemistry to standard H&E assessment of CIN would be valuable for the diagnostic accuracy, thereby optimizing CIN management and possibly decreasing overtreatment.