Investigator

Rena R Jones

Yale University School of Public Health, Environmental Health Sciences

About

RRJRena R Jones
Papers(6)
Associations of self-…Fine Particulate Matt…State-Specific Incide…Outdoor light at nigh…Serum perfluorooctane…Serum concentrations …
Collaborators(10)
Jonathan N. HofmannJongeun RheeJared A. FisherNeal D FreedmanAkemi T. WijayabahuAleah L. ThomasAmy Berrington de Gon…Antonia M CalafatBritt K. EricksonBritton Trabert
Institutions(6)
Division Of Cancer Ep…National Cancer Insti…National Institutes o…National Center For E…University Of Minneso…University of Utah

Papers

Fine Particulate Matter, Noise Pollution, and Greenspace and Prostate Cancer Risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Cohort

Abstract Background: Greenspace is hypothesized as being protective against cancer, whereas noise pollution and fine particulate matter (<2.5 μm in diameter, PM2.5) are both potential risk factors. Findings from recent studies of greenspace and PM2.5 with prostate cancer are not conclusive and the association between noise exposure and cancer has not been evaluated in a U.S. study. Methods: We assessed PM2.5, noise, and greenspace exposure using spatiotemporal models and satellite-based estimates at enrollment addresses for N = 43,184 male participants of the prospective Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial cohort (enrolled 1994–2001). We used Cox regression models adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, study center, family history of prostate cancer, and Area Deprivation Index to estimate associations between ambient PM2.5 (μg/m3), greenspace (index range from –1 to 1), and noise pollution (loudest 10% of total existing sound, decibels) and incident prostate cancer risk through December 2017. Results: A total of 6,327 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed among male participants during follow-up. PM2.5 and noise exposures were moderately positively correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.46), and PM2.5 and greenspace were not correlated (ρ = 0.10); greenspace and noise were inversely correlated (ρ = −0.32). In single-pollutant and multipollutant models mutually adjusted for coexposures, we found no associations with prostate cancer risk. Conclusions: We did not find evidence that PM2.5, greenspace, and noise pollution were associated with prostate cancer risk in this large, geographically spread cohort. Impact: This study contributes to a small body of existing literature investigating these biologically plausible associations.

State-Specific Incidence of Endometrial Cancer in the United States by Histologic Subtype Corrected for Hysterectomy Prevalence from 2010 to 2019

Abstract Background: Accurate reporting of state-specific endometrial cancer incidence is important for informing cancer control efforts and may lead to new hypotheses about environmental and/or geographic risk factors. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of accounting for hysterectomy prevalence when estimating state-level endometrial cancer incidence rates as hysterectomy prevalence varies by geographic region. Methods: We used the Cancer in North America Public Use Dataset produced by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries to identify incident endometrial cancer cases among women ≥20 years of age diagnosed from 2010 to 2019. We estimated state-specific hysterectomy-corrected, age-adjusted incidence rates overall and by histology. State-specific hysterectomy prevalence data were obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Results: Hysterectomy prevalence was highest in Southern and Midwestern states and lowest in the Northeast. Although uncorrected endometrial cancer incidence rates were highest in the Northeast, hysterectomy-corrected rates were highest in states within the Midwest and Appalachia. Geographic patterns of the hysterectomy-corrected incidence of endometrioid cancer resembled those of endometrial cancer overall. In contrast, corrected rates of non-endometrioid cancer were highest in the South and in certain states within the Northeast and Midwest. There was no overlap in the top 10 states with the highest rates of endometrioid and non-endometrioid cancers, respectively. Conclusions: State-specific, hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of endometrial cancer vary by histology, suggesting potential differences in behavioral, sociodemographic, and/or environmental exposures at the state level. Impact: This study presents an accurate assessment of US endometrial cancer rates and emphasizes the importance of hysterectomy correction for geographic comparisons.

Serum perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoate and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer according to hormone receptor status: An analysis in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

Abstract Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are highly persistent endocrine‐disrupting chemicals that may contribute to breast cancer development; however, epidemiologic evidence is limited. We investigated associations between prediagnostic serum levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and postmenopausal breast cancer risk, overall and by hormone receptor status, in a nested case‐control study of 621 cases and 621 matched controls in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. PFOS and PFOA levels were determined based on serum metabolomic profiling performed using ultraperformance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between each PFAS and breast cancer risk, overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status, and by joint ER/PR status. We found little evidence of association between PFOS or PFOA and breast cancer risk overall. However, in subtype‐specific analyses, we observed statistically significant increased risks of ER+, PR+, and ER+/PR+ tumors for the third vs lowest quartile of serum PFOS (ORs [95% CIs] = 1.59 [1.01‐2.50], 2.34 [1.29‐4.23], and 2.19 [1.21‐3.98], respectively) and elevated but nonstatistically significant ORs for the fourth quartile. Conversely, for PFOA, modest positive associations with ER−, PR−, ER+/PR−, and ER−/PR− tumors were generally seen in the upper quartiles. Our findings contribute evidence supporting positive associations between serum PFOS and hormone receptor‐positive tumors, and possibly between PFOA and receptor‐negative tumors. Future prospective studies incorporating tumor hormone receptor status are needed to better understand the role of PFAS in breast cancer etiology.

Serum concentrations of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and risk of ovarian cancer

Abstract Background Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent, widespread environmental contaminants, and some are endocrine disrupting. Studies of gynecologic cancers are limited; we evaluated ovarian cancer, a rare, often fatal malignancy. Methods This nested case-control study included 318 ovarian cancer cases and 472 individually matched female controls in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, which recruited participants aged 55-74 years from 10 US study centers (1993-2001). We looked at cases through 2016 and quantitated 8 PFAS in prediagnostic serum samples. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous (log2-transformed) and categorized PFAS concentrations by using conditional logistic regression models, implicitly adjusting for matching factors (age, center, year of random assignment, year of blood draw, race and ethnicity) and adjusting for smoking, body mass index, family history of cancer, menopausal hormone therapy and oral contraceptive use, parity, and number of freeze-thaw cycles. Results We found a positive association with ovarian cancer for a doubling in 2-(N-methyl-perfluorooctane sulfonamido) acetic acid (MeFOSAA) concentrations (OR for log2 = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.49) and 62% greater risk among those in the highest quartile (OR for quartile 4 vs quartile 1 = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.54; P for trend = .02). Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) was associated with increased risk (OR for log2 = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.06), with no quartile trend (P for trend = .79). Associations with perfluorononanoic acid (OR for log2 = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.95) and perfluorodecanoic acid (OR for log2 = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.95) were suggested, with nonmonotonic quartile trends (P for trend = .12 to .21). The MeFOSAA associations were strongest in women aged 55-59 years (OR for log 2 = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.27), more moderate in women aged 60-64 years (OR for log2 = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.90), and null among women 65 years of age and older (OR for log2 = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.73 to 1.43; P for heterogeneity = .22). Associations persisted in cases diagnosed 8 years or more after blood collection. Conclusions These findings offer novel evidence for PFAS as ovarian cancer risk factors, particularly PFOS and MeFOSAA, a PFOS precursor.

147Works
6Papers
33Collaborators
NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsCarcinoma, EndometrioidProstatic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of Cancer

Positions

2017–

Researcher

Yale University School of Public Health · Environmental Health Sciences

2012–

Senior Investigator

National Cancer Institute · Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

Country

US

Links & IDs
0000-0003-1294-1679

Scopus: 55346443000

Researcher Id: IXN-8797-2023